Factors that Influence Co-production among Student Interns, Consumers, and Providers of Social and Public Health Services
Implications for Interprofessional Collaboration and Training
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21834985 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sunggeun Park (0000-0001-8942-566X, University of Michigan, corresponding author), Rolando Morel Pinto (0000-0002-6077-3406, University of Michigan) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 71-83 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Work in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1937-190X • E-ISSN: 1937-1918 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/19371918.2021.1974638 |
| PMID | 34488568 |
| OpenAlex | W3197944273 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
Providers of public health and social services ("providers") develop and deliver services by engaging in interprofessional collaboration (IPC), from seeking external advice to making referrals and linkages to various social and public health services. Providers collaborate with consumers of social and public health services ("consumers") and student interns (e.g., social work, public health) to explore, determine, and deliver relevant services through a process referred to as co-production. Both IPC and co-production are widespread strategies with the potential to improve service accessibility and quality. However, the intersection of co-production and IPC remains understudied. This study examines factors that influence co-production in IPC among service providers, consumers, and student interns. We used cross-sectional survey data from an NIMH-funded study, including 379 providers in 36 HIV-service organizations in New York City. We examined the relationships between providers' perspectives on co-production in IPC and multiple provider- and organization-level variables using random-effects logistic regression. Most respondents said that consumers and students in their agency participate in IPC on the issues that concern them. Providers who perceive greater flexibility in the IPC process were more likely to agree that their organizations' providers co-produced IPC. Organizational service offerings (i.e., multilingual services, a comprehensive range of services), job positions, and full-time employment status were strong predictors of co-production. Our findings indicate that intentional and inclusive models of flexible IPC are needed. Fostering co-production in the HIV service field requires more institutional support and incentives for organizations, providers, and student interns. Implications for research and practice are discussed
Business · Incentive · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Service provider · Sociology · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work · Marketing
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Co-Production and Co-Creation
Is the quality of the patient-provider relationship associated with better adherence and health outcomes for patients with HIV?
What ‘Patient-Centered’ Should Mean: Confessions Of An Extremist
The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration
Patient-Centered Care and Outcomes
Culturally competent healthcare systems
Recommendations for HIV Screening of Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men — United States, 2017
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Research advisory board members' contributions and expectations in the USA
Dental Care Utilization of Hospitalized Persons Living with HIV and Substance Use
Exploring group dynamics for integrating scientific and experiential knowledge in Community Advisory Boards for HIV research
Interprofessional collaboration improves linkages to primary care
Factors That Influence Linkages to HIV Continuum of Care Services
Interprofessional collaboration
The Strategic Action Field of Sex Work and Sex Trafficking
Representative Bureaucracy Through Staff With Lived Experience
What is youth participation
Coproduction in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorder and Its Relationship to Clinics’ Service Output Patterns
Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept
Varieties of Participation in Public Services
Coproduction
Policy Work
Recruiting and retaining service agencies and public health providers in longitudinal studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|