Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Facilitating Scientific Communication Between Strangers

A Preregistered Lost E-Mail Experiment

Bibliographic Data

ID22004205
AuthorsThomas I Vaughan-Johnston (0000-0002-4682-481X, Durham University, corresponding author), Devin I Fowlie (0000-0003-1827-511X, Queen's University), Jill A Jacobson (0000-0001-7794-8543, Queen's University)
Year2022
Volume25
Issue7
Pages424-431
Publication date2022-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2152-2715 • E-ISSN: 2152-2723
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1089/cyber.2021.0272
PMID35467948
OpenAlexW4224326691
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited39

Communication scholars are increasingly concerned about biases that shape people's interactions with science. Past study has focused on echo chambers (cultivating social networks that reinforce existing worldviews). People's facilitation of scientific discourse between strangers also may be shaped by their attitudes. To study the latter, we employed a recent adaptation of Milgram's lost letter technique called the lost e-mail technique (LET). We conducted a preregistered field study using a large undergraduate university sample (N = 1,508) to examine how the LET might elucidate people's treatment of scientific information. We distributed four ostensibly misaddressed scientific messages and monitored the likelihood of these e-mails being facilitated by participants. Participants' beliefs about self-esteem's importance, assessed months earlier, were associated with increased facilitation of scientific claims congruent with (vs. incongruent with) these beliefs. Thus, people shape the spread of online information in a manner matching their beliefs, even for people outside their social networks

Facilitation · Milgram experiment · Obedience · Social facilitation · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Media Influence and Health · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Recruitment Strategies Bias Sampling and Shape Replicability

    Open Access•Thomas I Vaughan-Johnston, Faizan Imtiaz et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2026

  • Republic

    Cass R Sunstein•#Republic•2017

  • Analysis and Improvement of the Measurement of Interpersonal Attraction and Homophily

    Linda L McCroskey, James C Mccroskey et al.•Communication Quarterly•2006

  • Shared identity and shared information in social media

    Markus Kaakinen, Anu Sirola et al.•Media Psychology•2020

  • Reflecting on Six Decades of Selective Exposure Research

    Open Access•Steven Smith, Steven M Smith et al.•Social and Personality Psychology…•2008

  • Does High Self-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, or Healthier Lifestyles?

    Open Access•Roy F Baumeister, Jennifer D Campbell et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2003

  • A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.

    Carol S Dweck, Ellen L Leggett•Psychological Review•1988

  • Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook

    Open Access•Eytan Bakshy, Messing et al.•Science•2015

  • Naïve beliefs shape emotional reactions to evaluative feedback

    Thomas I Vaughan-Johnston, Jill A Jacobson•Cognition & Emotion•2021

  • Are you passing along something true or false? Dissemination of social media messages about genetically modified organisms

    Open Access•Qian Xu, Y Song et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2021

  • Turn a Blind Eye If You Care

    Open Access•Axel Westerwick, Steven B Kleinman et al.•Journal of Communication•2013

  • Back to the Future of Dissonance Theory

    Bertram Gawronski•Social Cognition•2012

  • Assessing the Correspondence between Experimental Results Obtained in the Lab and Field

    Open Access•Alexander Coppock, Donald P Green•Political Science Research and…•2015

  • Urban Size Differences in Incidence of Altruistic Behavior

    Open Access•F Stephen Bridges, Neil P Coady•Psychological Reports•1996

  • "Comment on "A Failure to Validate the Lost Letter Technique

    Stanley Milgram•Public Opinion Quarterly•1969

  • You've got mail

    Open Access•Brad J Bushman, Angelica M Bonacci•Journal of Experimental Social…•2004

  • Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty

    Open Access•Penny S Visser, Jon A Krosnick et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2003

  • Wanting other attitudes

    Open Access•Kenneth G Demarree, S Christian Wheeler et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2014

  • The “false consensus effect”

    Open Access•Lee Ross, David Greene et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1977

  • The Lost-Letter Technique

    Open Access•Stanley Milgram, Leon Mann et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1965

  • A Validation of the Lost-Letter Technique

    R Lance Shotland, Wallace G Berger et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1970

  • Media Use and Political Predispositions

    Open Access•Natalie Jomini Stroud•Political Behavior•2008

  • Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects

    Gary H Mcclelland, Charles M Judd•Psychological Bulletin•1993

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae