Enhancing Mathematical Thinking Among Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers
A Systematic Literature Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22006541 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nofouz Mafarja (0000-0001-7367-3431, University of Malaya, corresponding author), Suzieleez Syrene Abdul Rahim (0000-0001-9272-5241, University of Malaya, corresponding author), Hutkemri Zulnaidi (0000-0002-7799-1223, University of Malaya) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/21582440261445506 |
| OpenAlex | W7155558871 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
Mathematical thinking is increasingly recognized as a foundational competency for pre-service mathematics teachers (PSMTs), encompassing critical thinking, problem solving, abstraction, and modeling skills essential for effective teaching and learning. This systematic literature review synthesizes empirical studies published between 2018 and 2025 to examine strategies, challenges, contextual variations, and research gaps in fostering mathematical thinking within teacher education programs. Following the PRISMA framework, 21 studies were rigorously selected from major academic databases. Findings reveal diverse pedagogical approaches, including creativity-driven task design, computational thinking integration, digital and AI-supported reflective practices, and contextualized mathematical modeling. Persistent challenges include PSMTs’ difficulties in interpreting real-world problem contexts, responding to student thinking, and engaging in deep reflective practice. Contextual factors such as technological access, self-efficacy, gender, and educational policy further influence the development of mathematical thinking. Notable gaps identified include limited integration of critical and computational thinking frameworks, underutilization of AI-based tools, and insufficient strategies for inclusive and equitable instruction. The review concludes with recommendations for teacher education programs to adopt holistic, research-informed, and culturally responsive pedagogies that embed mathematical thinking as a central component of professional competence
Cognitively Guided Instruction · Computational Thinking · Critical thinking · Empirical research · Professional development · Reflective thinking · Systematic review · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Mathematics Education and Pedagogy · Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences
Learning to Think Mathematically
How to learn and how to teach computational thinking
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Innovative approaches in mathematical modeling
The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers
Analysis of Gender Issues in Computational Thinking Approach in Science and Mathematics Learning in Higher Education
| Highly cited | No |
|---|