Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Terminological Drift and the Reordering of Knowledge from Al-Ghazali’s Perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID22023914
AuthorsAhmad Faizuddin Ramli (0000-0003-4387-6160, National University of Malaysia), Zulkiflee Haron (University of Technology Malaysia), Ramli Awang (Film Independent)
Year2026
Volume11
Issue4
Pagese100
Publication date2026-07-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Islamic Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2207-4414 • E-ISSN: 2207-4414
PublisherIslamic Sciences and Research Academy (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.55831/ajis.v11i4.1351
OpenAlexW7167583243
LanguageEN
References cited13

This article examines al-Ghazali’s (d. 505/1111) critique of terminological distortion in the Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (The Revival of the Religious Sciences) as a diagnosis of epistemological disorder within the Islamic sciences. It argues that al-Ghazali understood semantic contraction not merely as a linguistic shift or rhetorical concern, but as a process that reshaped the hierarchy of knowledge, scholarly prestige, and the spiritual telos of learning. Focusing on five interrelated terms – fiqh (jurisprudence), ʿilm (knowledge), tawḥīd (the Oneness of God), dhikr/tadhkīr (remembrance/admonition), and ḥikmah (wisdom), the study traces a recurring pattern in which originally expansive concepts became narrowed through disciplinary capture, performative usage, or reduced doctrinal formulation. Methodologically, the article combines qualitative content analysis with close textual reading of the Kitāb al-ʿIlm (Book of Knowledge) and related passages in the Iḥyāʾ. It maintains interpretive discipline through repeated re-reading of chapters, cross-checking individual passages against the architecture of the Kitāb al-ʿIlm, and limiting claims to meanings explicitly supported by the text. The article concludes that al-Ghazali’s reflections on terminology are best understood as part of a wider sociology of the Islamic sciences, in which the governance of key terms helped order scholarly status, regulate authoritative knowledge, and shape the social life of learning in the Islamic Golden Age

Discipline · Hermeneutics · Islam · Narrative · Performative utterance · Reflexivity · Rhetorical question · Subjectivism · Terminology · Education and Islamic Studies · Islamic Studies and History · Medieval and Classical Philosophy

  • Law and Legal Theory in Classical and Medieval Islam

    Wael B Hallaq•Law and Legal Theory in Classical…•2022

  • Al-Ghazali's Philosophical Theology

    Frank Griffel•The philosophical theology of…•2009

  • On the Origin of Two Key-Terms in Al-Gazzālī's Ihyā' 'Ulūm Al-Din

    Avner Giladi, Avner Gil'Adi•Arabica•1989

  • The Scholastic Method in Medieval Education

    George Makdisi•Speculum•1974

  • Analyzing al‐Ghazali’s Perspective on Christianity

    Open Access•Ahmad Faizuddin Ramli, Jaffary Awang•The Muslim World•2025

  • Ghazālī on the Ethics of Action

    George F Hourani•Journal of the American Oriental…•1976

  • Ghazālī and the Perils of Interpretation

    Ahmad Dallal, Richard M Frank•Journal of the American Oriental…•2002

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae