Examining the Self-Reported Instructional Leadership Practices of Science Heads of Departments in Lesotho Secondary Schools
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22047293 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lucia Nthooa Lisene (Central University of Technology, corresponding author), Loyiso C Jita (0000-0001-6871-6820, Central University of Technology), Thumah Mapulanga (0000-0002-5609-3539, Central University of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 347 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci16020347 |
| OpenAlex | W7130945255 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 31 |
Instructional leadership is crucial for improving teaching quality and student academic performance, especially in secondary schools where Heads of Department (HoDs) play a vital role. Despite this, there is no empirical evidence on how Science HoDs provide instructional leadership in Lesotho. This study looked at the self-reported instructional leadership techniques of Science HoDs in Lesotho secondary schools and whether they vary based on specific demographic and workload criteria. Using a quantitative descriptive survey approach, data were obtained from 67 Science HoDs using a paper-based questionnaire adapted from the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (PIMRS). Descriptive statistics and inferential analysis were employed (t-tests and ANOVA). The data indicate that Science HoDs frequently used tactics such as goal planning and communication, curriculum coordination, learner progress monitoring, teaching time management, and instructional resource availability. However, high-impact pedagogical approaches, such as classroom observation, formal written feedback, and systematic evaluation of teacher learning, were less frequently implemented. Except for the number of courses taught, instructional leadership strategies showed no significant differences by age, gender, qualification, experience, teaching load, or school location. The study reveals a preference for administrative rather than pedagogical instructional leadership, highlighting the need for targeted professional development and policy support to improve HoDs’ capacity for sustained instructional practices in science education
Curriculum · Descriptive statistics · Instructional leadership · Preference · Professional development · Workload · Educational Environments and Student Outcomes · Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Assessing Instructional Leadership with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale
Leadership for learning
The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes
The applicability of Visible Learning to higher education.
Assessing the Instructional Management Behavior of Principals
Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited
Distributed Leadership
Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics
The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education
Examining Primary School Principals’ Instructional Leadership Practices
A Systematic State-of-the-Art Review of Asian Research on Principal Instructional Leadership, 1987–2024
A systematic review of instructional leadership research conducted with the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (PIMRS), 1983–2024
The importance of middle leadership for school improvement
The challenges faced by heads of departments in selected Lesotho high schools
Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Attitudes
The relationship between principals’ pedagogical leadership practices and teachers’ job performance
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |