Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The impact of telework on absenteeism, presenteeism, and return to work among workers with health conditions

A scoping review

Bibliographic Data

ID22069138
AuthorsJulien Ducas (0009-0006-0225-6749, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, corresponding author), Catherine Daneau (0000-0002-9627-9290, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières), Salma Bouqartacha (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières), Alexandra Lecours (0000-0002-4485-7829, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation), Jacques Abboud (0000-0002-9019-8000, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières), Andrée-Anne Marchand (0000-0001-7002-6028, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières), Martin Descarreaux (0000-0002-3545-5860, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières)
Year2025
Volume13
Pages1655200-1655200
Publication date2025-09-09
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1655200
PMID40994755
OpenAlexW4414217789
LanguageEN
References cited51

Introduction: Telework has become increasingly prominent as a flexible work arrangement, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. For workers managing health conditions, it may support continued employment by influencing key work-related phenomena such as absenteeism, presenteeism and return to work (RTW) process. However, current evidence on the impact of telework on the work-related outcome to manage health condition in the workplace remains limited and fragmented. Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature on the impact of telework on absenteeism, presenteeism, and RTW outcomes among adult workers with health conditions. Methods: Included studies were either qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods, published in English or French, including adults with any physical or psychological health conditions. At least one outcome domain (absenteeism, presenteeism, or RTW) was required. Eight databases were searched from inception to May 2025: Medline, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Academic Search Complete, Business Source Complete, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, and ABI/INFORM Global. Data extraction focused on study design, objectives, variables/definitions, sample size, health status, demographic characteristics, individual characteristics, organizational factors and results. Data were synthesized by the outcome domain (absenteeism, presenteeism, RTW) and stratified by study type (quantitative vs. qualitative). Results: From 4,093 records, 21 studies were included. The majority of studies suggest that telework contributes to reduced absenteeism by increasing work flexibility. Telework is also consistently associated with facilitating RTW, particularly following surgery or in the context of chronic illness, by supporting work reintegration and shortening the duration of sick leave. In contrast, findings on presenteeism are conflicting: some studies report that telework increases the likelihood of working while sick, others suggest a decrease, and some report no significant impact or conflicting results. These outcomes appear to be influenced by contextual factors, including health status, demographic variables, individual characteristics, and organizational context. Conclusion: Telework appears to offer flexibility that can reduce absenteeism and facilitate RTW. However, its impact on presenteeism is less consistent and may even encourage working while sick if not properly supervised. Future studies should examine which policies most effectively maximize the benefits of telework while minimizing potential drawbacks

Absenteeism · Presenteeism · Sick leave · Telecommuting · Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout · Work-Family Balance Challenges · Workplace Health and Well-being

  • A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home

    Open Access•Jodi Oakman, Natasha Kinsman et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting

    Ravi S Gajendran, David A Harrison•Journal of Applied Psychology•2007

  • Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

    Micah D J Peters, Casey Marnie et al.•JBI Evidence Synthesis•2020

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • Health impacts with telework on workers

    Open Access•Yuko Furuya, Shoko Nakazawa et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • The prevalence of telework under Covid-19 in Canada

    Open Access•Murtaza Haider, Azreen Anwar•Information Technology and People•2023

  • Mismatch between actual and preferred extent of telework

    Open Access•Marina Heiden, David Hallman et al.•BMC Public Health•2023

  • Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism

    Gunnar Aronsson, Klas Gustafsson et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2000

  • Remote Workers' Reasons for Changed Levels of Absenteeism, Presenteeism and Working Outside Agreed Hours During the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Luke Anthony Fiorini•SAGE Open•2024

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae