Lessons learned
Enhancing rural risk communication for future health crises through the PHERCC framework
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22070549 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Abimbola Leslie (0000-0002-0236-7602, University of Vermont), Elizabeth K Woods (University of Vermont, corresponding author), Eline Van Den Broek-Altenburg (0000-0002-4831-9083, University of Vermont), Eline M van den Broek-Altenburg, Gary S Stein (0000-0001-8762-5422, University of Vermont), Jan K Carney (0000-0002-3822-0303, University of Vermont) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Pages | 1594833-1594833 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1594833 |
| PMID | 40538684 |
| OpenAlex | W4411062124 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 57 |
Introduction: Public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, highlight the critical role of effective risk communication in managing crises. The Public Health Emergency Risk and Crisis Communication framework (PHERCC) provides a structured approach to crafting, delivering, and refining public health messages to build trust, promote compliance, and enhance societal resilience. Methods: This qualitative study examined COVID-19 risk communication strategies in rural Northern New England using the PHERCC framework. Data were collected through seventeen stakeholder interviews, seven focus groups, and a pilot study conducted between November 2022 and March 2023. Stakeholders represented state and local organizations, while focus group participants included rural residents. A thematic analysis using NVivo software aligned findings with the six PHERCC domains: Evidence, Initiator, Channel, Publics, Message, and Feedback. Results: Stakeholders emphasized transparency in public health messaging, adapting to evolving evidence while maintaining consistency. Trusted local sources and traditional media were essential for reaching vulnerable populations, particularly older adults in rural areas. Public feedback highlighted barriers such as misinformation, translation challenges, and limited internet access. The pilot study confirmed that community collaboration and tailored messaging increased understanding and trust among rural residents. Simplified accessible core messages and consistent updates further enhanced public engagement. Conclusion: This study shows the importance of evidence-based, adaptive, and population subgroup sensitive communication during public health emergencies. The PHERCC framework proved instrumental in addressing challenges, promoting trust, and refining strategies. Investing in inclusive communication systems and leveraging community partnerships are important for effective responses to future health crises
Business · Focus group · Health communication · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · Stakeholder · Thematic analysis · Disaster Management and Resilience · Disaster Response and Management · Medicine · Nursing · Public Health Policies and Education · Marketing
The Emergence of Covid-19 in the US
Impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on rural America
Socio-cultural values in managing risk communication during the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia
Best practices in public risk communication during enteric illness outbreak investigations
A narrative literature review to inform the development of a health threats preparedness framework in Ireland
Public Health and Risk Communication During Covid-19—Enhancing Psychological Needs to Promote Sustainable Behavior Change
The impact of nontransparent health communication during the Covid-19 pandemic on vaccine-hesitant people’s perception of vaccines
Risk communication and community engagement in the context of Covid-19 response in Bangladesh
How risk communication impacts public psychology and behaviors during compound disasters
Emergency risk communication
Health Communication and Behavioral Change During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Women in the Margins
Risk and Health Communication during Covid-19
The Roles of Social Media Use and Medical Mistrust in Black Americans’ Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy
Covid-19 and digital inequalities
Zika Virus Infection Knowledge and Communication Preferences Among Women of Reproductive Age in Central Brooklyn, New York
Bridging the rural‐urban divide
Understanding the Risk of Social Vulnerability for the Chinese Diaspora during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics
Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Ebola and the rhetoric of US newspapers
Public health communication during the Covid-19 pandemic
Perspectives of Vietnamese Americans Regarding Covid-19 Vaccine Acceptance, Trusted Sources of Information, and Pandemic-related Challenges
| Highly cited | No |
|---|