Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Generative AI in physical education and health

A narrative review and conceptual framework for interdisciplinary thematic learning

Bibliographic Data

ID22082166
AuthorsGewenjin Zhu (Soochow University), Xi Dai (0000-0002-1610-3392, Soochow University), Suqi Jiang (Soochow University), Zili Wang (0000-0002-5003-3092, Soochow University), Mengyuan Liang (0000-0002-7848-9411, Soochow University), Yuchen Pan (0000-0001-9260-4562, Soochow University), Yuliu Tao (Soochow University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume14
Pages1842782-1842782
Publication date2026-06-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2026.1842782
PMID42317995
OpenAlexW7163404881
LanguageEN
References cited72

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has created new possibilities for teaching and learning, yet its pedagogical role in physical education and health (PEH) remains underdeveloped. Current AI-related research in PEH has largely focused on performance-oriented and technical applications, such as motion analysis, skill evaluation, and training monitoring, with less attention to curriculum design, interdisciplinary learning, and teacher-mediated pedagogical use. This narrative review synthesizes literature on GenAI in PEH and related interdisciplinary or thematic learning contexts to examine how GenAI may support interdisciplinary thematic learning in PEH. The review highlights an emerging shift from AI as a technical or analytical tool toward GenAI as a pedagogical resource for lesson planning, assessment design, feedback, inquiry support, and knowledge integration. Based on this synthesis, the study proposes a pedagogical framework that positions GenAI as a teacher-mediated resource for connecting bodily practice, health knowledge, reflective inquiry, and social participation. The framework includes four core dimensions: curriculum and goal alignment, content organization and task design, inquiry and learning process support, and assessment and adaptive adjustment. It also emphasizes human-AI collaboration, teacher judgment, embodied observation, and ethical use as necessary conditions for meaningful implementation. The review suggests that GenAI may support PEH when it is integrated carefully into pedagogically designed, context-sensitive, and health-promoting learning processes. Future empirical research, particularly design-based studies and classroom interventions, is needed to test and refine the framework in authentic PEH settings

Conceptual framework · Curriculum · Embodied cognition · Generative grammar · Narrative · Physical education · Thematic analysis · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Children's Physical and Motor Development · Physical Education and Pedagogy

  • Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI

    Open Access•Thomas K F Chiu•Computers and Education:…•2024

  • Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom

    Open Access•Yoshija Walter•International Journal of…•2024

  • The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research

    Open Access•Tariq Alqahtani, Hisham A Badreldin et al.•Research in Social and…•2023

  • Designing assessments in the generative AI era

    Open Access•Nadeera Ahangama•International Journal of…•2026

  • Application of digital-intelligent technologies in physical education

    Open Access•Qiying Zhong, Jiajun Jiang et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • Exploring Decision-Making Competence in Sugar-Substitute Choices

    Open Access•Carlo Dindorf, Fabienne Weisenburger et al.•Education Sciences•2024

  • Becoming human with technology

    Open Access•Ove Østerlie, Chad M Killian•Learning Media and Technology•2026

  • The paradox of experience

    Salvador Baena-Morale, María Sánchez-Jarque et al.•Physical Education and Sport…•2025

  • From policy ambition to classroom practice

    Open Access•Jing Yang, Chao Qiu et al.•Physical Education and Sport…•2026

  • How does generative AI learning support affect vocational college students’ employability? – An empirical analysis based on latent profiles and interdisciplinary learning chain pathways

    Liang Yuqian, Li Rui et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2026

  • The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education

    Open Access•Thomas K F Chiu•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • A Checklist for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence to Create Lesson Plans in K–12 Physical Education

    Thomas Trendowski•Journal of Physical Education…•2025

  • Beyond the Basics

    Kimberly Vigil, Rebecca Simons•Journal of Physical Education…•2026

  • Creating Assessments Using Artificial Intelligence

    Thomas Trendowski•Journal of Physical Education…•2026

  • Evolving Professionalism in the AI Era

    YongJin Lee, Dongho Kim et al.•Journal of Physical Education…•2025

  • Unlocking Educational Potential

    Omar Albaloul, Risto Marttinen et al.•Journal of Physical Education…•2024

  • Using Artificial Intelligence and the Teach-SAN-TA Model for All Domains of Learning

    Thomas Trendowski•Journal of Physical Education…•2026

  • The impact of generative AI on health professional education

    Open Access•Thai Duong Pham, Nilushi Karunaratne et al.•Medical Education•2025

  • Enhancing Badminton Rule Learning Through a GPT ‐Integrated Line Bot

    Open Access•Kuo‐Chin Lin, Hui-Chun Hung et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2026

  • Promoting Interdisciplinary Learning With Generative AI Through Self‐Regulated Scaffolding

    Open Access•Qi Xia, Yiming Yang et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2026

  • Promoting AI literacy in social work education

    Open Access•Joshua Weber, Lauri Goldkind•Social Work Education•2026

  • Emotion‐Aware AI in Physical Education

    Open Access•Ke Chen, Chaojun Wang et al.•European Journal of Education•2025

  • Help of ChatGPT about math skills on the subjects of social studies

    Open Access•Sibel Oğuz Haçat, İbrahim Kepceoğlu•The Journal of Educational Research•2025

  • Students' use patterns of generative artificial intelligence during problem‐solving in an intelligent learning system

    Open Access•T T Wang, Tingting Wang et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2026

  • Examining interactive AI-supported learning environments

    Open Access•Henan Wu, Zilin Wang et al.•Acta Psychologica•2026

  • Fostering preservice teachers’ interdisciplinary curriculum development through generative AI-mediated knowledge-building practices

    Ge Song, Shaoyan Dang et al.•Journal of Education for Teaching…•2026

  • Searching for the alternative

    Open Access•Petter Wiklander, Andreas Fröberg et al.•European Physical Education Review•2023

  • Digital feedback via free ChatGPT within the reciprocal teaching style

    Open Access•Ahmed Hassan Rakha•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2026

  • A qualitative case study of primary classroom teachers’ perceived value of physical education in New Zealand

    Cheng Deng, Maureen Legge•Sport Education and Society•2022

  • Physical education and health curriculum reform in China

    Open Access•Jing Yang, Chao Qiu et al.•Sport Education and Society•2025

  • Comparing AI-assisted and traditional tactical instruction

    Open Access•Chenglong Miao, Shuai Zhang et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae