Are they in or out? Exploring pre-service teachers’ knowledge, perceptions, and experiences regarding artificial intelligence (AI) in teaching and learning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22164693 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Filomena T Dayagbil (0000-0002-3373-9931, Cebu Normal University), Helen B Boholano (0000-0003-4365-3370, Cebu Normal University), Gino G Sumalinog (0000-0002-5967-4769, Cebu Normal University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2025.1665205 |
| OpenAlex | W4414443835 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 28 |
Introduction Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to revolutionize the teaching and learning process. This study aimed to gather data on pre-service teachers’ perceived knowledge, perceptions, and experiences in utilizing AI in education, such as ChatGPT, Quillbot, and Grammarly. Methods This mixed-method study involved 515 participants from state universities in Central Visayas, Philippines, selected via stratified random sampling. Quantitative data were collected through a survey, while qualitative insights were gathered from focus group discussions and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results and discussion Results showed that pre-service teachers’ perceptions of AI revealed cautious optimism, with concerns about its limitations in handling complex tasks, bias, lack of originality, and the need for human oversight. They also recognized issues of factual inaccuracies, reliance on outdated data, and lack of contextual understanding, indicating a need for further education on AI’s ethical and practical use. Four themes emerged from the qualitative data: the role of AI in teaching and learning; challenges and ethical implications; capacity training for AI integration; and the link between AI tools and critical thinking. Conclusion In conclusion, pre-service teachers recognize AI’s limitations and emphasize the importance of training for its responsible and effective use. Recommendation It is recommended that AI use be integrated into the teacher education curriculum to prepare teachers for ethical and meaningful application in classrooms
Curriculum · Focus group · Perception · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Thematic analysis · Educational Games and Gamification · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Online Learning and Analytics
Students’ voices on generative AI
Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers
Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes
AI and the Future of Teaching
State of the art and practice in AI in education
The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers
Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators
Artificial intelligence in dance education
Using thematic analysis in psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|