Quality management of higher education within the framework of the socio-investment model of economic growth
State audit and financial control
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22166459 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anatoliy B Yaroshchuk (0000-0003-0217-0620, State University of Management, corresponding author), Azamat Yu Guliev (0000-0003-0134-5425, State University of Management), Mikhail N Mikhaylenko (State University of Management) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Publication date | 2022-11-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2022.1057005 |
| OpenAlex | W4309535760 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 40 |
The article aims to study the contribution of quality management in higher education through state audit and financial control to the implementation of the socio-investment model of economic growth. The article is based on the scientific hypothesis that quality management in higher education should be based on university rankings. The article presents the authors’ view on the interpretation of recent results in the research field of quality management in higher education and reveals the strengths and weaknesses of the hypothesis. Systematization and critical analysis of the indicators of quality and effectiveness in higher education based on the leading university rankings for 2022—the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation—are performed. The case study method is used for the case analysis of the management of quality and effectiveness on the example of the leading Russian university, which has been the leader of these rankings for many years: Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU). The scientific novelty and originality of the article are associated with a systematic view of the quality and effectiveness of higher education, which was first formed by the authors through a combination and grouping of indicators from the leading university rankings for 2022. The theoretical significance of the authors’ conclusions lies in the fact that the article clearly identifies a significant contribution of the quality control of education and the performance management of universities to the implementation of the socio-investment model of economic growth. The practical significance of the obtained results is that the scientific and methodological basis for monitoring and assessing quality and effectiveness in higher education based on the leading university ratings for 2022 makes it possible to improve the state audit and financial control of university activities in the implementation of the socio-investment model of economic growth
Audit · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Higher education · Management · Novelty · Originality · Political science · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Strengths and weaknesses · Agricultural and Financial Auditing · Educational Innovations and Challenges · Human Resources and Workforce · Psychology · Accounting
Towards digital society management and ‘capitalism 4.0’ in contemporary Russia
Maintaining and monitoring quality of a continuously administered digital assessment
Students’ learning approaches as a factor of academic achievement at selected public universities
How Might We Raise Interest in Robotics, Coding, Artificial Intelligence, STEAM and Sustainable Development in University and On-the-Job Teacher Training
Does University Ranking Matter? Choosing a University in the Digital Era
Sustainability university rankings
World-class Universities in Russia
Impacts of organisational culture on academic efficiency and productivity in selected private universities in the Niger delta region of Nigeria
Investigating the technical efficiency of Japanese national universities following corporatization
The signaling value of university rankings
Comparing the comparators
Standards of practice
New state standards of higher education for training of digital personnel in the conditions of Industry 4.0
Higher education quality assessment model
A theoretical framework for explaining the paradox of university rankings
The role of an equity policy in the reproduction of social inequalities
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |