A theoretical framework for explaining the paradox of university rankings

Bibliographic Data

ID3075738
AuthorsTuukka Kaidesoja (0000-0002-9633-2944, University of Helsinki, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume61
Issue1
Pages128-153
Publication date2022-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science Information (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0539-0184 • E-ISSN: 1461-7412
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/05390184221079470
OpenAlexW4220955991
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited47

University rankings have led to the following paradox. On one hand, global and national university rankings have an increasing impact on scientific research and higher education. On the other hand, a growing number of researchers have argued that university rankings are biased and methodologically flawed as well as documented their unintended consequences that are counterproductive to education and research activities in universities. In this article, I combine sociological and cognitive perspectives to develop a theoretical framework for explaining this paradox. The theoretical framework has four interrelated parts. The first is a distinction between three temporal stages through which university rankings commensurate universities. The second consists of an account of the social mechanisms through which university rankings generate reactive outcomes that tend to transform universities instead of just measuring their quality. The third is a league table metaphor that links the conceptual domain of team sports and the conceptual domain of universities and, I argue, provides a cognitive mechanism that shapes how many extra-academic actors, such as prospective students and policymakers, understand the results of university rankings. The fourth focuses on the affordances of the published league tables of university rankings that many extra-academic actors use for outsourcing part of their decision-making to the league tables. As a whole, this framework allows us to understand how the interrelated and materially mediated actions of different groups of actors give rise to and sustain the paradox of university rankings

Economics · Epistemology · Higher education · League table · Metaphor · Outsourcing · Political science · Positive economics · Public relations · Sociology · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Higher Education Governance and Development · Law · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access