Higher education quality assessment model
Towards Achieving Educational Quality Standard
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4096708 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amin Y Noaman (King Abdulaziz University), Abdul Hamid M Ragab (0000-0001-7431-078X, King Abdulaziz University), Ayman I Madbouly (0000-0001-5803-7525, Deanship of Admission and Registration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, corresponding author), Ahmed M Khedra (King Abdulaziz University), Ayman G Fayoumi (King Abdulaziz University), Ayman Fayoumi (0000-0002-4160-3305, King Abdulaziz University) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 23-46 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0307-5079 • E-ISSN: 1470-174X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03075079.2015.1034262 |
| OpenAlex | W2016561399 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 18 |
This paper presents a developed higher education quality assessment model (HEQAM) that can be applied for enhancement of university services. This is because there is no universal unified quality standard model that can be used to assess the quality criteria of higher education institutes. The analytical hierarchy process is used to identify the priority and weights of the model criteria and their alternatives. The model has 3 levels with 8 main objectives and 53 alternatives. It included e-services criteria, which is one of the recent modern university components, in addition to new sub-criteria for enhancing the model. It produces important recommendations for university higher authorities for achieving demanded quality services. A questionnaire was developed to examine the quality criteria for evaluating the model at King Abdulaziz University, as an applied case study. The model proposed is flexible and can be applied in many other universities.Keywords: education qualityAnalytic Hierarchy Processassessment modelquality criteriaquality standards AcknowledgementThis Project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant No. (47/611/1434). The authors therefore acknowledge with thanks DSR technical and financial support.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.ORCIDAyman I. Madbouly http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5803-7525
Analytic hierarchy process · Business · Engineering management · External quality assessment · Hierarchy · Higher education · Management science · Operations management · Operations research · Political science · Quality assurance · Quality management · Computer Science · Engineering · Higher Education Governance and Development · Marketing
The problem and future of the higher education quality assessment system in China-Reflection on the Double World-Class Initiative
La Calidad de la Docencia Online en la Educación Superior
Measuring Online Teaching Service Quality in Higher Education in the Covid-19 Environment
Quality management of higher education within the framework of the socio-investment model of economic growth
Model Proposal for Service Quality Assessment of Higher Education
Universities’ and Academics’ Resources Shaping Satisfaction and Engagement
Mediating Role of Service Quality in the Relationship Between Self-Determined Study Abroad Motivations and Satisfaction
A new method to assess how curricula prepare students for the workplace in higher education
A conceptual model development of the impact of higher education service quality in guaranteeing edu‐tourists' satisfaction and behavioral intentions
Quality assessment framework for educational institutions in technical education
A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education
Engagement and interaction in a culturally diverse higher education setting
Framing higher education quality from a business perspective
Research on the Long-term Mechanism of Using Public Service Platforms in National Smart Education-Based on the Double Reduction Policy
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,75 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |