Why SMEs Want to Reduce Carbon Emissions? Ecological Responsibility, Legitimation, or Competitiveness
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22418252 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yi‐Hui Ho (0000-0003-4779-682X, Department of International Business Chang Jung Christian University Tainan Taiwan, ROC), Chieh‐Yu Lin (0000-0003-3393-9674, Department of International Business Chang Jung Christian University Tainan Taiwan, ROC, corresponding author), Keng-Boon Ooi (0000-0002-3384-1207, Centre for Business Informatics and Industrial Management UCSI University Kuala Lumpur Malaysia), Keng‐Boon Ooi (Korea University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Business Strategy and the Environment (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0964-4733 • E-ISSN: 1099-0836 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/bse.70575 |
| OpenAlex | W7125417757 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 103 |
This study examines the influence of ecological responsibility, legitimation, and competitiveness on the intention of Taiwanese SMEs to adopt carbon reduction practices. It further investigates whether these intentions translate into actual implementation and explores the moderating role of employee green efficacy in this relationship. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey of Taiwanese SMEs. A total of 326 valid responses were analyzed using regression analysis to test the proposed hypotheses. Findings reveal that ecological responsibility is the most significant predictor of adoption intention, followed by competitiveness, while legitimation exerts the weakest effect. Employee green efficacy significantly moderates the relationship between intention and implementation, increasing the likelihood of action. These findings advance the literature on SME environmental strategy by extending Bansal and Roth's ecological responsiveness model through the integration of the theory of planned behavior alongside institutional and social cognitive perspectives. By highlighting the role of employee green efficacy in strengthening the translation of intentions into action, the study offers a theoretically enriched understanding of how cognitive and institutional mechanisms jointly drive SME carbon reduction. Practically, the results provide actionable insights for policymakers and SME managers seeking to facilitate effective transitions toward reduced carbon emissions.
Cognition · Corporate social responsibility · Ecological systems theory · Institutional theory · Legitimation · Self-efficacy · Social cognitive theory · Survey data collection · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions
Emotional Conservatism
The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage
Green innovation and organizational performance
A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy
Slack Resources and the Performance of Privately Held Firms
The Proposition of a General Version of the Theory of Planned Behavior
Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Common method biases in behavioral research
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM
Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)
The intention-implementation gap for community involvement in urban waterways governance
Are small and medium enterprises defining their business models to reach a symbolic or substantive environmental legitimacy
The theory of planned behavior
Sustainability from a Chinese cultural perspective
Green consumption
The Institutional Logics Perspective
Social Cognitive Theory
The Iron Cage Revisited
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |