Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does medical students’ perception of team-based learning have an impact on achieving planned learning outcomes?

Bibliographic Data

ID22425188
AuthorsKauser Jabeen (0000-0003-2497-7847, Aga Khan University, corresponding author), Javeria Rehman (0000-0002-3482-3721, Aga Khan University), Syeda Sadia Fatima (0000-0002-3164-0225, Aga Khan University), Imaduddin Ahmed (0000-0001-8115-7859), Imran Ahmed (0000-0001-7425-3113, Aga Khan University), Kulsoom Ghias (0000-0002-8709-7428, Aga Khan University)
Year2026
Volume26
Issue1
Publication date2026-04-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMC Medical Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1472-6920 • E-ISSN: 1472-6920
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s12909-026-09185-9
PMID41981576
OpenAlexW7154268147
LanguageEN
References cited19

BACKGROUND: Students’ perceptions of pedagogies can be a barrier for active learning. We explored whether students’ opinion of team-based learning (TBL) impacted knowledge acquisition. METHODOLOGY: A mixed method study was conducted during the Infectious diseases and Immunity module for undergraduate Year 2 medical students. Student evaluation after each TBL session was collected using eight parameters on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores of the end-of-session test were compared with individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) scores. Statistical analysis was done to compare and correlate knowledge scores and students’ ratings. Focused group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with students for in-depth feedback on their perceived value and effectiveness of TBL. RESULTS: A total of 96 students participated in the study. End-of-session test scores were significantly higher than iRAT scores (p-value < 0.0001). There was no difference in end-of session test scores (p-value < 0.664) between students who gave an overall rating of 1/2 versus 4/5. Pearson correlation showed no relationship between student rating and iRAT or end-of-session test scores. A higher proportion of students agreed that TBL enhanced critical thinking, engagement, accountability, and conceptual understanding, but only half of the students wanted TBL as a strategy in other modules. FGD with fifteen students predominantly identified that extensive pre-reading material led to learner dissatisfaction and disengagement. Though they affirmed that the quizzes and application exercises were helpful in clarification of difficult concepts. CONCLUSION: TBLs improved students’ knowledge acquisition independent of their rating of TBL sessions. Lengthy pre-reading material, longer duration, and lack of equal participation were attributed to a lower rating. Redesigning TBL sessions according to students’ feedback may improve students’ perception of TBL in the future. This study contributes to the literature on the effectiveness and acceptability of TBL by assessing academic performance and feedback and exploring student perception.

Likert scale · Perception · Rating scale · Significant difference · Team-based learning · Innovations in Medical Education · Innovative Teaching Methods · Problem and Project Based Learning

  • The relationship between medical student engagement in the provision of the school’s education programme and learning outcomes

    Xiaoming Xu, Nicolaas A Bos et al.•Medical Teacher•2022

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae