Ethical and Responsible Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence by University Students
Design and Validation of an Instrument Using the Expert Competence Coefficient
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22434331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ernesto Colomo Magaña (0000-0002-3527-7937), Ernesto Colomo-Magaña (Universidad de Málaga), Julio Cabero-Almenara (0000-0002-1133-6031, Universidad de Sevilla), Julio Ruiz Palmero (0000-0002-6958-0926, Universidad de Málaga), Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez (0000-0002-0689-6317, Universidad de Sevilla) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Issue | 25 |
| Pages | 1-20 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2386-4303 • E-ISSN: 2386-4303 |
| Publisher | Universidad Pablo de Olavide (PUBLISHER • ES) |
| DOI | 10.46661/ijeri.13253 |
| OpenAlex | W7162435461 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 46 |
The rapid emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in higher education makes it necessary to guide its use on the basis of ethical principles and responsible practices. The aim of this study was to validate the Questionnaire on Responsible and Ethical Practices in the Academic Use of Artificial Intelligence (CPREUA-IA) for university students. The expert judgement method was employed, with the Expert Competence Coefficient (ECC) used to select evaluators. Of the 154 initial participants, 77 reached the required level of high competence (ECC ≥ 0.8). The results showed positive ratings for the clarity, coherence, and relevance factors across the seven dimensions of the instrument (ethical and moral practices, metacognitive regulation, self-regulation, critical verification, uncertainty management, legal and regulatory use, and ongoing training), with no items requiring elimination. It is concluded that the instrument demonstrates content validity, and that psychometric validation with university students is now required.
Cognition · Generative grammar · Judgement · Metacognition · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Scientific Research and Technology
Trustworthy artificial intelligence
In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society
Validación de un instrumento para medir el uso académico de la IAGen en estudiantes universitarios
Literacidad en Inteligencia Artificial en la Educación Superior
A Review of the Valid Methodological Use of Adaptive Comparative Judgment in Technology Education Research
Competencia digital e inteligencia artificial
Longitudinal relationships between student ethical considerations, behavioral intention, and perceived knowledge in artificial intelligence education
Aceptación de ChatGPT en Educación Superior
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring
Marcos de Competencias Digitales para docentes universitarios
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |