Thinking with relations in nature conservation? A case study of the Etosha National Park and Haiǁom

Bibliographic Data

ID2254395
AuthorsUte Dieckmann (0000-0001-9640-6942, University of Cologne, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume29
Issue4
Pages859-879
Publication date2023-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1359-0987 • E-ISSN: 1467-9655
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-9655.14008
OpenAlexW4386147392
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited52

The area of the Etosha National Park in Namibia has been inhabited for many centuries by Haiǁom, a group of (now former) hunter-gatherers. In 1907, Etosha was proclaimed as a game reserve, although Haiǁom were still allowed to live in the area until they were expelled in the 1950s due to then-dominant ideas of fortress conservation. In recent years, Haiǁom have been provided with several resettlement farms by the Namibian government as a reaction to the colonial land dispossession. In this article, I explore the onto-epistemology of Haiǁom (i.e. their being in and knowing the Etosha area), focusing on their relations with the land and with human and beyond-the-human beings before their eviction. I argue that the eviction implies not only economic marginalization but also social deprivation, which is inadequately addressed with resettlement. I suggest that thinking with relations, illustrated with the Haiǁom case, would call for other solutions in the context of measures taken for past land dispossessions and would open new paths for Namibia's nature conservation initiatives

Ancient history · Archaeology · Context (archaeology · Eviction · Fortress (chess · Geography · National park · Political science · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Global Maritime and Colonial Histories · History · Law

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access