Online Argument Between Israeli Jews and Palestinians
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2270041 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Donald G Ellis (0000-0002-4791-5748, University of Hartford), Ifat Maoz (0000-0002-8524-1297, Hebrew University of Jerusalem) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 291-309 |
| Publication date | 2007-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Communication Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0360-3989 • E-ISSN: 1468-2958 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00300.x |
| OpenAlex | W2014396855 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 28 |
Previous research with face-to-face groups found that majority–minority theory was a better predictor of argument patterns between Israelis and Palestinians than cultural codes theory (D. G. Ellis & I. Maoz, 2002; I. Maoz & D. G. Ellis, 2001). But, because of the difficulties of organizing face-to-face contacts between Israelis and Palestinians (e.g., security, transportation, check points), computer-mediated communication has taken on increased significance. This paper builds on previous research pertaining to argument between Israeli Jews and Palestinians and extends that work by investigating the effects of communication technologies on argument interactions between these two groups. The most notable finding was the absence of complex argumentative structures that are typically associated with conflict resolution
Argument (complex analysis · Argumentative · Conflict resolution · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept · Social science · Sociology · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology · Team Dynamics and Performance
Public Engagement Exercises with Racial and Cultural “Others”
“Likes” for Peace
Understanding Argumentation in Interpersonal Communication
Argument and Ethnopolitical Conflict
Using the Conversation Argument Coding Scheme to Examine Interpersonal Conflict
Origins and Development of the Conversational Argument Coding Scheme
Confidence in Contact
Looking my enemy (?) in the eyes
The pragmatics of amicable interstate communication
Selective Posting
Arab Americans’ Motives for Using the Internet as a Functional Media Alternative and Their Perceptions of U.S. Public Opinion
Wedialog.Net
Contact theory in the workplace
Learning About the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict Through Computerized Simulations
Assessing the viability of virtual structured democratic dialogue
Does Inter-Group Deliberation Foster Inter-Group Appreciation? Evidence from Two Experiments in Belgium
Demographics and (Equal?) Voice
Argumentation in discourse and grammar
Women for Peace
Interaction Through Technological Lenses
The Contact Space
Social Identification and Interpersonal Communication in Computer-Mediated Communication
The Skills of Argument
Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making
Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction
Panacea or Panopticon?
Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use
Talking straight
Argument and Decision Making in Computer-Mediated Groups
Relational Responsibility
The impact of varying argument quality and minority size on influencing the majority and perceptions of the minority
Face-To-Face at Arm's Length
Multiple conflicts and competing agendas
Going to Ground
Toward a theory of minimally rational argument
Structure of conversational argument
Majority-Minority Influence
Handbook of social psychology
An Experiment in Peace
Group and Interpersonal Effects in International Computer-Mediated Collaboration
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,22 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2025 (18) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |