Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Digital Organizational Culture Scale

Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Spanish Version

Bibliographic Data

ID23039640
AuthorsDavid Coello-Montecel (0000-0001-8183-7344, Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral), Paola Ochoa (0000-0001-6657-6406, Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral, corresponding author)
EditorsAtte Oksanen (0000-0003-4143-5580)
Year2025
Volume2025
Issue1
Publication date2025-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Behavior and Emerging Technologies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2578-1863 • E-ISSN: 2578-1863
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1155/hbe2/7366964
OpenAlexW4413087796
LanguageEN
References cited89

Digital technologies have transformed various aspects of life, along with the social and organizational infrastructures that support them. Their increased presence in the workplace has given rise to concepts such as digital organizational culture (DOC)—a framework of shared beliefs, values, and practices that shape individual identities in a digital society and foster diverse, complex patterns of adoption, transformation, or resistance to emerging technological realities. Although prior studies have assessed the psychometric properties of the DOC scale across different populations, limited validation studies have targeted the Latin American context, and, to our knowledge, its measurement invariance has not yet been evaluated. Addressing these gaps, this study evaluated the scale’s validity, reliability, and measurement invariance. Data were collected from 315 Ecuadorian professionals, with the questionnaire translated into Spanish through a back‐translation process. Psychometric properties and measurement invariance were assessed via confirmatory factor analysis. Findings confirmed that the DOC scale is a valid, reliable measure of DOC and established measurement equivalence across groups defined by gender, age, educational attainment, work modality, and type of organization. Additionally, this study highlights the instrument’s applicability in Ecuador, enhancing prospects for future research in the region.

Confirmatory factor analysis · Context (archaeology) · Developmental psychology · Equivalence (formal languages) · Geography · Knowledge management · Measurement invariance · Organizational culture · Political science · Psychometrics · Public relations · Scale (ratio) · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Technostress in Professional Settings

  • Shaping the Digital Enterprise

    Open Access•Gerhard Oswald, Michael Kleinemeier•Shaping the Digital Enterprise•2017

  • Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation

    Open Access•E C Martins, Fransie Terblanche•European Journal of Innovation…•2003

  • On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown

    Hubert W Lilliefors•Journal of the American…•1967

  • The Autonomy Paradox

    Melissa Mazmanian, Wanda J Orlikowski et al.•Organization Science•2013

  • Organizational Culture and Innovation

    Open Access•Thorsten Büschgens, Andreas Bausch et al.•Journal of Product Innovation…•2013

  • On the Performance of Maximum Likelihood Versus Means and Variance Adjusted Weighted Least Squares Estimation in CFA

    André Beauducel, Philipp Y Herzberg et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2006

  • Organizational culture, innovation, and performance

    Suellen J Hogan, Leonard V Coote•Journal of Business Research•2014

  • A Comparison of Diagonal Weighted Least Squares Robust Estimation Techniques for Ordinal Data

    Christine Distefano, Grant B Morgan•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2014

  • Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness

    Chad A Hartnell, Amy Yi Ou et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2011

  • Organizational Culture

    Jay B Barney•Academy of Management Review•1986

  • Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

    Gordon W Cheung, Roger B Rensvold•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2002

  • When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.

    Mijke Rhemtulla, Patricia E Brosseau-Liard et al.•Psychological Methods•2012

  • Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance

    Fangfang Chen, Fang Fang Chen•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2007

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data

    Open Access•Cheng-Hsien Li•Behavior Research Methods•2016

  • Access to digital culture as a driver of social and cultural openness

    Open Access•Giuseppe Lamberti, Jordi López-Sintas et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Digital technologies and firm performance

    Open Access•Eva Martinez, Eva Martínez-Caro et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Composite Reliability in Structural Equations Modeling

    Open Access•Donald R Bacon, Paul L Sauer et al.•Educational and Psychological…•1995

  • Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices

    Open Access•Dexin Shi, Taehun Lee et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2019

  • Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data

    Victoria Savalei•Multivariate Behavioral Research•2021

  • How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations

    Wayne F Cascio, Ramiro Montealegre•Annual Review of Organizational…•2016

  • Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But

    Andrew F Hayes, Jacob J Coutts•Communication Methods and Measures•2020

  • Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

    Open Access•Lee J Cronbach•Psychometrika•1951

  • Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures

    Barbara M Byrne, Richard J Shavelson et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1989

  • Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross‐National Consumer Research

    Jan-Benedict E M Steenkamp, Jan‐Benedict E M Steenkamp et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•1998

  • Cultura Digital e Formação de Professores

    Open Access•Jacques De Lima Ferreira•Educar em Revista•2020

  • Participation, Remediation, Bricolage

    Mark Deuze•The Information Society•2006

  • Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling

    Open Access•Nassim Tabri, Craig M Elliott•Canadian Graduate Journal of…•2012

  • Dimensionalizing Cultures

    Open Access•Geert Hofstede•Online Readings in Psychology and…•2011

  • From alpha to omega

    Open Access•Thomas J Dunn, Thom Baguley et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2014

  • The Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom

    Open Access•D A Kenny, Burcu Kaniskan et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2015

  • An Empirical Evaluation of the Use of Fixed Cutoff Points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models

    Open Access•Feinian Chen, Feinian Chen Feinian Chen et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2008

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae