Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500

Bibliographic Data

ID23317459
AuthorsMalte Meinshausen (0000-0003-4048-3521, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author), Zebedee Nicholls (0000-0002-4767-2723, The University of Melbourne), Jared Lewis (0000-0002-8155-8924, The University of Melbourne), Matthew Gidden (0000-0003-0687-414X, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, corresponding author), Elisabeth Vogel (0000-0003-1341-6358, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author), Mandy Freund (0000-0002-8839-5494, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), Urs Beyerle (0000-0002-6464-0838, ETH Zurich, corresponding author), Claudia Gessner (0000-0001-7701-5807, ETH Zurich, corresponding author), Alexander Nauels (0000-0003-1378-3377, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author), Nico Bauer (0000-0002-0211-4162, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research), Josep G Canadell (0000-0002-8788-3218, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, corresponding author), J S Daniel (0000-0001-9903-1007, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory), Andrew John (0000-0002-6811-3525, The University of Melbourne), Paul B Krummel (0000-0002-4884-3678, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, corresponding author), Gunnar Luderer (0000-0002-9057-6155, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, corresponding author), Nicolai Meinshausen (ETH Zurich), Stephen A Montzka (0000-0002-9396-0400, corresponding author), P J Rayner (0000-0001-7707-6298, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author), Stefan Reimann (0000-0002-9885-7138, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, corresponding author), Steven J Smith (0000-0003-3248-5607, Joint Global Change Research Institute, corresponding author), Maarten van den Berg (0000-0001-9649-7995), Marten van den Berg (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, corresponding author), Guus J M Velders (0000-0002-6597-7088, Utrecht University, corresponding author), Martin K Vollmer (0000-0001-5569-9718, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, corresponding author), Ray H J Wang (0000-0002-1550-3239, Georgia Institute of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume13
Issue8
Pages3571-3605
Publication date2020-08-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeoscientific Model Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1991-959X • E-ISSN: 1991-9603
PublisherCopernicus GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020
OpenAlexW3048501727
LanguageEN
Citations received102
References cited64

Anthropogenic increases in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations are the main driver of current and future climate change. The integrated assessment community has quantified anthropogenic emissions for the shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) scenarios, each of which represents a different future socio-economic projection and political environment. Here, we provide the greenhouse gas concentrations for these SSP scenarios – using the reduced-complexity climate–carbon-cycle model MAGICC7.0. We extend historical, observationally based concentration data with SSP concentration projections from 2015 to 2500 for 43 greenhouse gases with monthly and latitudinal resolution. CO2 concentrations by 2100 range from 393 to 1135 ppm for the lowest (SSP1-1.9) and highest (SSP5-8.5) emission scenarios, respectively. We also provide the concentration extensions beyond 2100 based on assumptions regarding the trajectories of fossil fuels and land use change emissions, net negative emissions, and the fraction of non-CO2 emissions. By 2150, CO2 concentrations in the lowest emission scenario are approximately 350 ppm and approximately plateau at that level until 2500, whereas the highest fossil-fuel-driven scenario projects CO2 concentrations of 1737 ppm and reaches concentrations beyond 2000 ppm by 2250. We estimate that the share of CO2 in the total radiative forcing contribution of all considered 43 long-lived greenhouse gases increases from 66 % for the present day to roughly 68 % to 85 % by the time of maximum forcing in the 21st century. For this estimation, we updated simple radiative forcing parameterizations that reflect the Oslo Line-By-Line model results. In comparison to the representative concentration pathways (RCPs), the five main SSPs (SSP1-1.9, SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5) are more evenly spaced and extend to lower 2100 radiative forcing and temperatures. Performing two pairs of six-member historical ensembles with CESM1.2.2, we estimate the effect on surface air temperatures of applying latitudinally and seasonally resolved GHG concentrations. We find that the ensemble differences in the March–April–May (MAM) season provide a regional warming in higher northern latitudes of up to 0.4 K over the historical period, latitudinally averaged of about 0.1 K, which we estimate to be comparable to the upper bound (∼5 % level) of natural variability. In comparison to the comparatively straight line of the last 2000 years, the greenhouse gas concentrations since the onset of the industrial period and this studies' projections over the next 100 to 500 years unequivocally depict a “hockey-stick” upwards shape. The SSP concentration time series derived in this study provide a harmonized set of input assumptions for long-term climate science analysis; they also provide an indication of the wide set of futures that societal developments and policy implementations can lead to – ranging from multiple degrees of future warming on the one side to approximately 1.5 ∘C warming on the other.

Atmospheric sciences · Climate change · Climate model · Climatology · Forcing (mathematics) · Fossil fuel · Greenhouse gas · Physics · Plateau (mathematics) · Radiative forcing · Representative Concentration Pathways · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols · Chemistry · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Ecology · Environmental Science · Geology · Mathematics

  • Saguinus martinsi

    Open Access•Angele Tatiane Martins-Oliveira, Pedro V Eisenlohr et al.•Primates•2025

  • Pulpo

    Open Access•Fabian Lechtenberg, Ioan-Robert Istrate et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2024

  • The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017

    Open Access•Marielle Saunois, Ann R Stavert et al.•Earth System Science Data•2020

  • Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points

    Open Access•David I Armstrong Mckay, Arie Staal et al.•Science•2022

  • Climate impacts on global agriculture emerge earlier in new generation of climate and crop models

    Open Access•Jonas Jägermeyr, Christoph Müller et al.•Nature Food•2021

  • Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia

    Open Access•Nerilie J Abram, Benjamin J Henley et al.•Communications Earth & Environment•2021

  • Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2

    Open Access•Kevin Rennert, Frank Errickson et al.•Nature•2022

  • Climate uncertainty impacts on optimal mitigation pathways and social cost of carbon

    Open Access•Chris Smith, Alaa Al Khourdajie et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • Temperature responses from methane mitigation approaches vary widely due to non-methane impacts

    Open Access•Sam Abernethy, Robert Buechler et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Estimating the sea level rise responsibility of industrial carbon producers

    Open Access•Shaina Sadai, Meghana Ranganathan et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Reversal of extreme precipitation trends over the Northeast US in response to aggressive climate mitigation in GFDL SPEAR

    Open Access•Bor‐Ting Jong, Zachary Michael Labe et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2026

  • Quantifying airborne fraction trends and the destination of anthropogenic CO 2 by tracking carbon flows in a simple climate model

    Open Access•Leeya Pressburger, Kalyn Dorheim et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • Dynamic modelling shows substantial contribution of ecosystem restoration to climate change mitigation

    Open Access•Emma Littleton, Kate Dooley et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Exposure to compound climate hazards transmitted via global agricultural trade networks

    Open Access•Patrick Keys, Elizabeth A Barnes et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Estimated climate impact of replacing agriculture as the primary food production system

    Open Access•Andrew H MacDougall, Joeri Rogelj et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Atmospheric methane underestimated in future climate projections

    Open Access•Thomas Kleinen, Sergey S Gromov et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • How much methane removal is required to avoid overshooting 1.5 ∘ C

    Open Access•Chris Smith, Camilla Mathison•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Detecting climate milestones on the path to climate stabilization

    Open Access•Andrew H MacDougall, Joeri Rogelj et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Physically based equation representing the forcing-driven precipitation in climate models

    Open Access•Donghyun Lee, Sarah Sparrow et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • Interplay between climate and carbon cycle feedbacks could substantially enhance future warming

    Open Access•Christine Kaufhold, Matteo Willeit et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Impacts on compound drought heatwave events in Australia per global warming level

    Open Access•Sarah Chapman, Ralph Trancoso et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • The carbon footprint of procreation

    Open Access•Emmanuel Pont•Environmental Research Letters•2026

  • Global multi-model trends of unsustainable irrigation under climate change scenarios

    Open Access•Andrea Citrini, Matteo Sangiorgio et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Interannual Enso diversity, transitions, and projected changes in observations and climate models

    Open Access•Mandy Freund, Josephine R Brown et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Daytime warming during early grain filling offsets the CO 2 fertilization effect in rice

    Open Access•Guoyou Zhang, Kazuhiro Ujiie et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Climate change penalty and benefit on surface ozone

    Open Access•Prodromos Zanis, Dimitris Akritidis et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Rising compound heatwave exposure in India

    Open Access•Karlapudi Sahithi, Velpuri Manikanta et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Modern air-sea flux distributions reduce uncertainty in the future ocean carbon sink

    Open Access•Galen A McKinley, Val Bennington et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • Projecting atmospheric N 2 O rise until the end of the 21st century

    Open Access•Makcim De Sisto, Christopher J Somes et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Fine-scale assessment of blue-water dependence via crop rotation systems in South Asia under a changing climate

    Open Access•Ali Ismaeel, Jin Wu et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Co-occurrence of climate-change induced and anthropogenic pressures in Central American key biodiversity areas

    Open Access•Lukas Baumbach, Thomas Hickler et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • A practical metric for estimating the current climate forcing of natural mires

    Open Access•Janne Rinne, Juha‐Pekka Tuovinen et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Ammonia emissions and crop yields in China to 2060 under SSP-RCP scenarios with climate change and nitrogen fertilization attribution

    Open Access•Ruijie Mu, Baojie Li et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2026

  • Long run emulator calibration increases warming and sea-level rise projections

    Open Access•Chris Wells, Christopher D Wells et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2026

  • Atmospheric methane removal may reduce climate risks

    Open Access•Sam Abernethy, Robert B Jackson•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Climate policies for carbon neutrality should not rely on the uncertain increase of carbon stocks in existing forests

    Open Access•Caspar T J Roebroek, L Caporaso et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Emulating long-term CMIP6 projections of sterodynamic sea-level change using a three-layer energy balance model

    Open Access•Victor Malagon Santos, Chris Smith et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Forced response and internal variability changes in the hydrological cycle and general circulation in a hot world beyond 2100 in the Community Earth System Model

    Open Access•Christian L E Franzke, Sun‐Seon Lee et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Tipping point in North American Arctic-Boreal carbon sink persists in new generation Earth system models despite reduced uncertainty

    Open Access•Renato K Braghiere, Joshua B Fisher et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • The coupled uncertainties in carbon dioxide removal and transient climate response to cumulative CO 2 emissions

    Open Access•Carla Maria Di Natale, Theresa Schaber et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Evolution of global snow drought characteristics from 1850 to 2100

    Open Access•Marianne Cowherd, L Ruby Leung et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • A global perspective on the spatial representation of climate extremes from km-scale models

    Open Access•Lukas Brunner, Benjamin Poschlod et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Coupling natural-social models can better quantify the interactions in achieving carbon neutrality in China

    Open Access•Tianpeng Wang, Yixiong Lu et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • On the emission-path dependency of the efficiency of ocean alkalinity enhancement

    Open Access•Jörg Schwinger, Timothée Bourgeois et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Stratospheric aerosol climate intervention could reduce crop nutritional value

    Open Access•B E Clark, Alan Robock et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Climate impact emergence and flood peak synchronization projections in the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Meghna basins under CMIP5 and CMIP6 scenarios

    Open Access•Anne Gädeke, Michel Wortmann et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Land conversions not climate effects are the dominant indirect consequence of sun-driven CO 2 capture, conversion, and sequestration

    Open Access•Moritz Adam, Thomas Kleinen et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Changes to population-based emergence of climate change from CMIP5 to CMIP6

    Open Access•Hunter Douglas, Luke J Harrington et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • A CMIP6 assessment of the potential climate change impacts on solar photovoltaic energy and its atmospheric drivers in West Africa

    Open Access•Derrick Kwadwo Danso, Sandrine Anquetin et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Effect of regional marine cloud brightening on land climate

    Open Access•Long Cao, Yu Fang et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2026

  • Inadequacy of agricultural best management practices under warmer climates

    Open Access•Mohamed Khalil Zammali, Ali Nazemi et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Revisiting two-layer energy balance models for climate assessment

    Open Access•Junichi Tsutsui, Chris Smith•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Past and projected climate change impacts on heat-related child mortality in Africa

    Open Access•Sarah Chapman, Cyril Birch et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Evaluating temporal trade-offs in climate effects from carbon dioxide removal strategies across different metrics

    Open Access•Stavroula Sartzetakis, Stavroula S Sartzetakis et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • The potential for fuel reduction to reduce wildfire intensity in a warming California

    Open Access•Patrick T Brown, Scott J Strenfel et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Strong increase in mortality attributable to ozone pollution under a climate change and demographic scenario

    Open Access•Dimitris Akritidis, Sara Bacer et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Uncertainty in Antarctic precipitation projections under global warming

    Open Access•Kai Man, Yujie Miao et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • The CDR potential of olivine-based enhanced rock weathering in marine systems

    Open Access•Luna Geerts, Astrid Hylén et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • What goes in must come out

    Open Access•Damien Couespel, Jerry Tjiputra•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • Mitigating climate change and ozone pollution will improve Chinese food security

    Open Access•Shouxiu Li, Yang Gao et al.•One Earth•2024

  • Toward quantification of the feasible potential of land-based carbon dioxide removal

    Open Access•Oliver Perkins, Peter Alexander et al.•One Earth•2023

  • CoBacFM

    Open Access•Kai Feng, Shang Wang et al.•One Earth•2024

  • Impact of climate and Aedes albopictus establishment on dengue and chikungunya outbreaks in Europe

    Open Access•Zia Farooq, Leo Segelmark et al.•The Lancet Planetary Health•2025

  • Warming of northern peatlands increases the global temperature overshoot challenge

    Open Access•Biqing Zhu, Chunjing Qiu et al.•One Earth•2025

  • Carbon removals from nature restoration are no substitute for steep emission reductions

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Zebedee Nicholls et al.•One Earth•2022

  • Narrowed uncertainty in future global temperature and remaining carbon budget

    Open Access•Irina Melnikova, Tokuta Yokohata et al.•One Earth•2025

  • Association of ambient temperatures with suicide attempts and violence with the future projections under climate change scenarios

    Open Access•Jiwoo Park, Ki Duk Park et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • Planetary boundaries under a land-based climate change mitigation scenario with a food demand transformation

    Open Access•Felicitas Beier, Jan Philipp Dietrich et al.•The Lancet Planetary Health•2025

  • Modelling an Optimal Climate-Driven Malaria Transmission Control Strategy to Optimise the Management of Malaria in Mberengwa District, Zimbabwe

    Open Access•Tafadzwa Chivasa, Mlamuli Dhlamini et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Stocktake of G20 countries’ climate pledges reveals limited macroeconomic costs and employment shifts

    Open Access•Rafael Garaffa, Matthias Weitzel et al.•One Earth•2023

  • Projecting temperature-related dengue burden in the Philippines under various socioeconomic pathway scenarios

    Open Access•Xerxes Seposo, Sary Valenzuela et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • Challenges to Viticulture in Montenegro under Climate Change

    Open Access•António Carlos Pinheiro Fernandes, Nataša Kovač et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2024

  • Future drought risks in the Yellow River Basin and suggestions for targeted response

    Open Access•Haoyu Deng, Yunhe Yin et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2023

  • Dynamics of population exposure to landslides under climate change scenarios

    Open Access•Pritha Ghosh, Somnath Bera et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2026

  • A probabilistic performance-based framework for heat vulnerability and risk assessment of buildings

    Open Access•Simona Bianchi, Jonathan Ciurlanti•International Journal of Disaster…•2026

  • Future climate risks to world cultural heritage sites in Spain

    Open Access•Haisheng Hu, HU Hai-sheng et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2024

  • Mosquito and global dengue cases in a warming world

    Open Access•Jie Hu, Ben Horton et al.•BMJ Global Health•2025

  • Projections of dengue epidemics attributable to climate change in Peru

    Open Access•Taehee Chang, Saebom Choi et al.•BMJ Global Health•2026

  • Assessing the size and uncertainty of remaining carbon budgets

    Open Access•Robin Lamboll, Zebedee Nicholls et al.•Nature Climate Change•2023

  • Asymmetry in the climate–carbon cycle response to positive and negative CO2 emissions

    Open Access•Kirsten Zickfeld, Deven Azevedo et al.•Nature Climate Change•2021

  • The social costs of hydrofluorocarbons and the benefits from their expedited phase-down

    Open Access•Tammy Tan, Lisa Rennels et al.•Nature Climate Change•2024

  • Stringent mitigation substantially reduces risk of unprecedented near-term warming rates

    Open Access•Christine M McKenna, Amanda C Maycock et al.•Nature Climate Change•2021

  • Forecasting Climate Change Using a Multivariate Cointegrated System

    Open Access•Jennifer L Castle, Jennifer Castle et al.•Oxford Bulletin of Economics and…•2026

  • Climate-driven habitat shifts and conservation gaps for Himalayan Solomon’s Seal (Polygonatum cirrhifolium (Wall) Royle) in Nepal Himalaya

    Open Access•Babu Ram Paudel, Chandra Kanta Subedi et al.•Trees Forests and People•2025

  • Enhancing water management and urban flood resilience using Hazard Capacity Factor Design (HCFD) model

    Open Access•Jaekyoung Kim, Jongpyo Park et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2024

  • Global trends in urban forest irrigation

    Open Access•Manuel Esperón‐Rodríguez, Rachael V Gallagher et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2025

  • Regional-scale energy-water nexus framework to assess the GHG emissions under climate change and development scenarios via system dynamics approach

    Open Access•Hossein Abolghasemzadeh, Elnaz Zekri et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2024

  • Potential benefit of electric vehicles in counteracting future urban warming

    Open Access•Xuan Chen, Jiachuan Yang•Sustainable Cities and Society•2022

  • Internal thermal mass for passive cooling and ventilation

    Open Access•Timothée de Toldi, Salmaan Craig et al.•Buildings and Cities•2022

  • Climate Change Effects on Carbonation Process

    Open Access•Gabriella Bretti, Maurizio Ceseri•Heritage•2022

  • Advancing the potential impact of future scenarios by integrating psychological principles

    Open Access•Isabel Richter, Elizabeth Gabe‐Thomas et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

  • Projected land-use change emissions surpass climate change-induced carbon sinks in Sub-Saharan African biomes

    Open Access•Dabwiso Sakala, Maria J Santos•Global Environmental Change•2025

  • Overshoot, potential air pollution co-benefits and food shortages

    Open Access•Li-Jing Liu, Qiao‐Mei Liang et al.•Global Environmental Change•2025

  • The social welfare value of the global food system

    Open Access•Simon Dietz, Benjamin Leon Bodirsky et al.•Ecological Economics•2025

  • Addressing methane emission feedbacks from global wetlands

    Open Access•Emily A Ury, Zhen Zhang et al.•Nature Sustainability•2025

  • Small Island Developing States under threat by rising seas even in a 1.5 °C warming world

    Open Access•Michalis Vousdoukas, Panagiotis Athanasiou et al.•Nature Sustainability•2023

  • Potential impacts of future climate on twelve key multipurpose tree species in Benin

    Open Access•Sèdoami Flora Dogbo, Kolawolé Valère Salako et al.•Trees Forests and People•2025

  • Response of plant species to impact of climate change in Hugumbrda Grat-Kahsu forest, Tigray, Ethiopia

    Open Access•Haftu Abrha, Soro Dodiomon et al.•Trees Forests and People•2024

  • Joint effects of urban heat island and global warming on heatwave risk

    Open Access•Lin Huang, Liang Huang et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2026

  • Coastal inundation scenarios in the north-eastern sector of the Island of Gozo (Malta, Mediterranean Sea) as a response to sea level rise

    Open Access•Vittoria Vandelli, Nilanjan Sarkar et al.•Journal of Maps•2023

  • The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300

    Open Access•Malte Meinshausen, Steven J Smith et al.•Climatic Change•2011

  • The Community Earth System Model

    James W Hurrell, M M Holland et al.•Bulletin of the American…•2013

  • The WCRP Cmip3 Multimodel Dataset

    Gerald A Meehl, Curt Covey et al.•Bulletin of the American…•2007

  • Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization

    Open Access•Veronika Eyring, Sandrine Bony et al.•Geoscientific Model Development•2016

  • Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6

    Open Access•Matthew Gidden, Keywan Riahi et al.•Geoscientific Model Development•2019

  • Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis

    Pierre Friedlingstein, Peter M Cox et al.•Journal of Climate•2006

  • Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, Magicc6 – Part 1

    Open Access•Malte Meinshausen, S C B Raper et al.•Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics•2011

  • Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes

    Open Access•Philip Brohan, John Kennedy et al.•Journal of Geophysical Research:…•2006

  • Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (Ceds)

    Open Access•Rachel Hoesly, Steven J Smith et al.•Geoscientific Model Development•2018

  • The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6

    Open Access•Brian C O''Neill, Claudia Tebaldi et al.•Geoscientific Model Development•2016

  • Impact of short-lived non-CO 2 mitigation on carbon budgets for stabilizing global warming

    Open Access•Joeri Rogelj, Malte Meinshausen et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2015

  • Negative emissions—Part 2

    Open Access•Sabine Fuss, William F Lamb et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

Unique citing works102
Citations per year17
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 100

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae