Combating Fake News on Social Media with Source Ratings
The Effects of User and Expert Reputation Ratings
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23323904 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Antino Kim (0000-0002-2886-0892, Indiana University), Patricia Moravec (0000-0001-5896-5444, The University of Texas at Austin), Alan R Dennis (0000-0002-6439-6134) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 931-968 |
| Publication date | 2019-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Management Information Systems (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0742-1222 • E-ISSN: 1557-928X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/07421222.2019.1628921 |
| OpenAlex | W2782032413 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 62 |
| References cited | 54 |
As a remedy against fake news on social media, we examine the effectiveness of three different mechanisms for source ratings that can be applied to articles when they are initially published: expert rating (where expert reviewers fact-check articles, which are aggregated to provide a source rating), user article rating (where users rate articles, which are aggregated to provide a source rating), and user source rating (where users rate the sources themselves). We conducted two experiments and found that source ratings influenced social media users’ beliefs in the articles and that the rating mechanisms behind the ratings mattered. Low ratings, which would mark the usual culprits in spreading fake news, had stronger effects than did high ratings. When the ratings were low, users paid more attention to the rating mechanism, and, overall, expert ratings and user article ratings had stronger effects than did user source ratings. We also noticed a second-order effect, where ratings on some sources led users to be more skeptical of sources without ratings, even with instructions to the contrary. A user’s belief in an article, in turn, influenced the extent to which users would engage with the article (e.g., read, like, comment and share). Lastly, we found confirmation bias to be prominent; users were more likely to believe — and spread — articles that aligned with their beliefs. Overall, our results show that source rating is a viable measure against fake news and propose how the rating mechanism should be designed.
Business · Information source (mathematics) · Internet privacy · Order (exchange) · Political science · Rating system · Reputation · Skepticism · Social media · Statistics · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Media Influence and Politics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Spam and Phishing Detection
Hive Mind Online
Análisis de las publicaciones con mayor repercusión en Facebook de los fact-checkers iberoamericanos en 2021
Agenda temática, metodologías e impacto de la investigación sobre desinformación. Revisión sistemática de la literatura (2016-2020)
Effects of Digital Transformation on Environmental Governance of Mining Enterprises
Procesamiento cognitivo de fake news políticas. Revisión de estudios experimentales
The Power of the Crowd
The disaster of misinformation
The Psychology of Fake News
Motivated by Design
What Sells on the Fake News Market? Examining the Impact of Contextualized Rhetorical Features on the Popularity of Fake Tweets
Exploring the Influence of Cumulative Ecological Risk on Belief in Fake News
What Drives People to Share Misinformation on Social Media during the Covid-19 Pandemic
A New Application of Social Impact in Social Media for Overcoming Fake News in Health
Research note
Semisupervised Federated Learning for Temporal News Hyperpatism Detection
Integrating Social Explanations Into Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Combating Misinformation
Investigating which corrective modalities generate greater positive user engagement on social media
Check the Report and Comments
“Shamed,” “Embarrassed,” and “Skeptical”
A computational linguistic analysis of the anatomy of production, consumption, and diffusion of misinformation and authentic information in social media
The structural fingerprints of disinformation
Do Heuristic Cues Affect Misinformation Sharing? Evidence From a Meta-Analysis
Source awareness and vaccine attitudes
Follow and spread the word
Establishing the typology and the underlying structure of rumor-combating behaviors
Consumers' purchase intentions in social commerce
Spread of misinformation on social media
Do symbol and device matter? The effects of symbol choice of fake news flags and device on human interaction with fake news on social media platforms
The effects of emotions, individual attitudes towards vaccination, and social endorsements on perceived fake news credibility and sharing motivations
Who shares misinformation on social media? A meta-analysis of individual traits related to misinformation sharing
Introduction
Latent profiling students’ emotions towards media literacy and examining its relationship to media credibility
Evaluating an animated, story-driven media literacy video to improve media credibility accuracy and understand the role of epistemic emotions in credibility ratings
Fake online reviews
The strength of weak ties and fake news believability
Search & Verify
Sustaining Livelihoods or Saving Lives? Economic System Justification in the Time of Covid-19
Development of the ability to assess (fake) news about ecology from adolescence to older adults
Effects of social information signals on user engagement
Can warnings curb the spread of fake news? The interplay between warning, trust and confirmation bias
Examining users’ news sharing behaviour on social media
Do you believe it? Examining user engagement with fake news on social media platforms
An investigation of the Covid-19-related fake news sharing on Facebook using a mixed methods approach
A systematic literature review of the motivations to share fake news on social media platforms and how to fight them
Testing the Effect of Information on Discerning the Veracity of News in Real Time
How Can We Fight Partisan Biases in the Covid-19 Pandemic? AI Source Labels on Fact-checking Messages Reduce Motivated Reasoning
Exploring the mechanism of social media addiction
Fake news detection using machine learning
Online silence
Effect of consistency of the review set on causal attribution
Fake news on the internet
More than feelings? How Facebook reaction icons affect online users' behavioral intentions toward online health rumor posts
Fake news on Facebook
Does political extremity harm the ability to identify online information validity? Testing the impact of polarisation through online experiments
Measuring the effect of political alignment, platforms, and fake news consumption on voter concern for election processes
Who is gullible to political disinformation ?”
The gift of life
Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during Covid-19
Unbundling Digital Media Literacy Tips
Exploring beyond detection
Cognitive Biases in Online Opinion Platforms
Misinformation on social platforms
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Like, comment, and share on Facebook
Toward a Theory of Social Judgments of Organizations
Reasons for confidence.
Credibility and computing technology
Hedonic Consumption
Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility
Confirmation Bias
Maps of Bounded Rationality
Communication and persuasion
Varieties of Confirmation Bias
Believe it or not
Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects
Measuring the Concept of Credibility
Introducing Cobras
Facebook Politics
The Emergence and Development of News Fact-checking Sites
Diagnostic and confirmation strategies in trait hypothesis testing
Debating the Truth
Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns
Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election
Not all emotions are created equal
Who is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process
| Unique citing works | 62 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 10,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 57 |