Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Powerful and Powerless Language Forms

Their Consequences for Impression Formation, Attributions of Control of Self and Control of Others, Cognitive Responses, and Message Memory

Bibliographic Data

ID2350142
AuthorsLawrence A Hosman, Susan A Siltanen (University of Southern Mississippi)
Year2006
Volume25
Issue1
Pages33-46
Publication date2006-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Language and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0261-927X • E-ISSN: 1552-6526
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0261927x05284477
OpenAlexW1978145449
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited22

This study investigates the effect of hedges, tag questions, intensifiers, and powerful messages on four sets of dependent variables: speaker evaluation, control of self and control of others attributions, cognitive responses, and message memorability. The results show that the four message types differ across measures of dynamism, control of self and control of others attributions, and three cognitive response categories. For the speakerevaluation and control-attribution variables, intensifiers are evaluated most positively and hedges are evaluated most negatively. On the cognitive-response measures, a more mixed pattern of results emerges. The results are discussed in terms of their importance for understanding the cognitive processing of these four message types

Attribution · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Dynamism · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Tentative Language in Mixed-Gender Conversations of Jordanians

    Open Access•Moh’d A Al-Omari, Wael M S Zuraiq et al.•Humanities & Social Sciences…•2020

  • Check the Report and Comments

    Open Access•Huai-Kuan Zeng, Tai-Yee Wu et al.•Digital Journalism•2023

  • From Military Member to Student

    William T Howe, Maria Shpeer•Journal of Intercultural…•2019

  • Speaking style and candidate evaluations

    M Utych•Politics Groups and Identities•2019

  • Linking Neuroimaging with Functional Linguistic Analysis to Understand Processes of Successful Communication

    Matthew Brook O’donnell, Emily B Falk•Communication Methods and Measures•2015

  • An experimental study of native speaker perceptions of non-native request modification in e-mails in English

    Berna Hendriks•Intercultural Pragmatics•2010

  • Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies

    Open Access•Jakob D Jensen, Ryan J Hurley•Public Understanding of Science•2012

  • The road already traveled

    Jessi Elana Aaron•Studies in Language•2016

  • Variation in evaluations of the (im)politeness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders

    Open Access•Maria Economidou-Kogetsidis•Journal of Pragmatics•2016

  • Scientific Uncertainty in News Coverage of Cancer Research

    Open Access•Jakob D Jensen•Human Communication Research•2008

  • Sex similarities and differences in stance in informal American conversation1

    Open Access•Kristen Precht•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2008

  • Norms and situational rules of address in English and Norwegian speakers

    Open Access•Winand H Dittrich, Thomas Johansen et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2011

  • Immediate Attention for Public Speech

    Open Access•L Lagerwerf, Amber Boeynaems et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2015

  • The Effects of Hedges in Persuasive Arguments

    Open Access•Amanda M Durik, M Anne Britt et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2008

  • Powerful and powerless styles of talk

    James J Bradac, Richard L Street•Research on Language and Social…•1989

  • An investigation of the effects of language style and communication modality on persuasion

    John R Sparks, Charles S Areni et al.•Communication Monographs•1998

  • A molecular view of powerful and powerless speech styles

    James J Bradac, Anthony Mulac•Communication Monographs•1984

  • Speech style and impression formation in a court setting

    Open Access•Bonnie Erickson, Bonnie E Erickson et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1978

  • Powerful Versus Powerless Language

    Open Access•Pamela Gibbons, Pamela Ellen Gibbons et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•1991

  • The Impact of Power-of-Speech Style, Argument Strength, and Need for Cognition on Impression Formation, Cognitive Responses, and Persuasion

    Open Access•Lawrence A Hosman, Thomas M Huebner et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2002

  • Conversation memory

    T Holtgraves, Thomas K Srull et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1989

  • The attributional and evaluative consequences of powerful and powerless speech styles

    Open Access•Lawrence A Hosman, Susan A Siltanen•Language & Communication•1994

  • Linguistic Power and Persuasion

    Open Access•T Holtgraves, Benjamin Lasky•Journal of Language and Social…•1999

  • The Relationship between Locus of Control and the Evaluative Consequences of Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles

    Open Access•Lawrence A Hosman•Journal of Language and Social…•1997

  • Language Attitudes and Cognitive Mediation

    Open Access•H Giles, K Henwood et al.•Human Communication Research•1992

  • Message Intensity and Cognitive Representations of Discourse Effects on Inferential Processing

    Open Access•Diane M Badzinski•Human Communication Research•1989

  • The Evaluative Consequences of Hedges, Hesitations, and Intensifies Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles

    Open Access•Lawrence A Hosman•Human Communication Research•1989

  • Toward a Message-Centered Theory of Persuasion

    Open Access•Michael Burgoon, Stephen B Jones et al.•Human Communication Research•1975

Citations per year0.78
Citation span2008 - 2023 (16)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae