Media Argumentation
Dialectic, Persuasion and Rhetoric
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23799581 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D Walton (0000-0003-0728-1370, University of Windsor, corresponding author), Douglas N Walton |
| Year | 2007 |
| Publication date | 2007-09-24 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Media Argumentation (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/cbo9780511619311 |
| OpenAlex | W4238470918 |
| Open Library | OL34475550M |
| ISBN | 9780511619311 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 38 |
Media argumentation is a powerful force in our lives. From political speeches to television commercials to war propaganda, it can effectively mobilize political action, influence the public, and market products. This book presents a new and systematic way of thinking about the influence of mass media in our lives, showing the intersection of media sources with argumentation theory, informal logic, computational theory, and theories of persuasion. Using a variety of case studies that represent arguments that typically occur in the mass media, Douglas Walton demonstrates how tools recently developed in argumentation theory can be usefully applied to the identification, analysis, and evaluation of media arguments. He draws upon the most recent developments in artificial intelligence, including dialogical theories of argument, which he developed, as well as speech act theory. Each chapter presents solutions to problems central to understanding, analyzing, and criticizing media argumentation.
Action (physics) · Argument (complex analysis) · Argumentation theory · Dialogical self · Epistemology · Identification (biology) · Informal logic · Mass media · Persuasion · Political communication · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Law · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Putin's Claims on the War in Ukraine
An Assessment of Translating Rhetorical Devices in King Abdullah II’s Political Speeches into English
How Do College Students Argue Orally in Classroom Debates With Different Communicative Goals
Improving the Argumentation Abilities of High School Students in China via the Toulmin Argumentation Pattern, Popper’s Falsificationism, and the Game of Eleusis
Info-arguments
The Fallacy of Unbeatable Force
Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements
Pathos in Natural Language Argumentation
The Message, the Medium and the Means of Argumentation
Modals and conditionals in instrumental practical reasoning
Critically Contextualising a Mega-Event
Identity dynamics in text messaging
Does Rhetoric Drive Conspiracy Theory Beliefs
An Argumentative Approach to “Framing”. Framing, Deliberation and Action in an Environmental Conflict
If she asked for settlement money, she must not be a real victim’
Evaluating policy as argument
Back to the Roots? The Applications of Communication Science Theories in Strategic Communication Research
Who Expresses Opinions in a Hostile Online Forum Environment and When
Autonomy and the Governance of ‘Ageing in Place’
Dialogue as a Journalistic Ideal
Argumentation Tactics and Public Deliberations
Measuring or Creating Attitudes? Seventy Years of Australian Public Opinion Polling about Indonesia
Monitoring discriminatory political discourse on immigration
Shameless normalization as a result of media control
Fortifying the otherness in Montenegrin political discourse
Practical reasoning in political discourse
Covid-19 and free movement restrictions in the Nordic countries – how did Finnish and Swedish MPs justify and criticise border controls
Following in the footsteps of tobacco and alcohol? Stakeholder discourse in UK newspaper coverage of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy
To Avoid Divisive Conflicts in a Church, Clarity and Consensus on Organisational Structure is Decisive, Along with Vagueness as to Theology
Argumentation in discourse and grammar
Negotiating digital surveillance legislation in post-Snowden times
When in parliamentary debate there is no debate
On conductive argumentation
Contextual frames and their argumentative implications
Women in the Extreme and Radical Right
Comparative Discourse Strategies in Environmental Advocacy
Pre-emptive Repair of Potential Misunderstandings
First there were 10
| Unique citing works | 38 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,53 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 37 |