Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When in parliamentary debate there is no debate

Argumentation strategies during Catalonia’s 2017 referendum

Bibliographic Data

ID6085016
AuthorsGema Rubio‐carbonero (0000-0002-5009-8291), Núria Franco-Guillén (0000-0002-2939-5937)
Year2022
Volume21
Issue4
Pages544-566
Publication date2022-08-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Language and Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1569-2159 • E-ISSN: 1569-9862
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/jlp.21007.rub
OpenAlexW3207053304
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited31

On the 1st October 2017 an independence referendum was organised in Catalonia. The aim of this paper is to analyse the nature of the political debate going on in the Catalan Parliament during the whole process by focusing on the kind of argumentation strategies that were used by each of the leanings to legitimise their political decisions. We do that relying on a methodological distinction that differentiates between sound argumentation and fallacious argumentation. By using a Critical Discourse Analysis approach, this study offers a wide picture of the kind of argumentation used by the main political actors involved in the process of decision making in Catalonia. The results show that there is more emphasis in antagonising with the others, than engaging in sound argument exchange that could facilitate minimal points of consensus. Such results may help explain why the Catalan conflict is still unsolved at the political level

Argument (complex analysis · Argumentation theory · Catalan · Epistemology · Independence (probability theory · Linguistics · Parliament · Political communication · Political science · Politics · Referendum · Sociology · European Union Policy and Governance · Mathematics · Political Systems and Governance · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Law · Philosophy

  • Delineating the discursive (de) legitimation strategies outlined by Spanish politicians in their no-confidence motion speeches

    Open Access•Ma Milagros Del Saz-Rubio•Discourse & Communication•2024

  • The Linguistic Construction of Political Identity

    Open Access•Isabel Negro Alousque•Círculo de lingüística aplicada a…•2024

  • Media Argumentation

    Open Access•D Walton, Douglas N Walton•Media Argumentation•2007

  • Argumentation Theory

    Open Access•Frans H Van Eemeren•Argumentation Theory•2018

  • Mapping and Measuring Deliberation

    André Bächtiger, John Parkinson•Mapping and Measuring Deliberation•2019

  • Discourse and Discrimination

    Martin Reisigl, Ruth Wodak•Discourse and Discrimination•2005

  • Social Movements and Referendums from Below

    Open Access•Donatella Della Porta, Flannery O''Connor et al.•Social Movements and Referendums…•2017

  • Populist parties in Western Europe. An analysis of the three core elements of populism

    Open Access•Belén Fernández-García, Óscar G Luengo•Communication & Society•1970

  • A bourgeois story? The class basis of Catalan independentism

    Donatella Della Porta, Martín Portos•Territory Politics Governance•2020

  • Narratives of the Process

    Open Access•Núria Franco-Guillén, Núria Franco‐Guillén et al.•Studies in Ethnicity and…•2022

  • Multilevel structures, coordination and partisan politics in Spanish intergovernmental relations

    Open Access•Eliseo Aja, César Colino•Comparative European Politics•2014

  • Just a Matter of Identity? Support for Independence in Catalonia

    Ivan Serrano•Regional & Federal Studies•2013

  • Why Stay Together? State Nationalism and Justifications for State Unity in Spain and the UK

    Coree Brown Swan, Daniel Cetrà•Nationalism and Ethnic Politics•2020

  • Spain vs. Catalonia

    Antonio Reyes•Social Semiotics•2020

  • Populism and Independence Movements in Europe

    Open Access•Carlos De Las Heras-Pedrosa, Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado et al.•Social Sciences•2020

  • Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Mapping State Structures—with an Application to Western Europe, 1950–2015

    Open Access•Paolo Dardanelli•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2018

  • On the problem of bias in political argumentation

    Open Access•Manfred Kienpointner, Walther Kindt•Journal of Pragmatics•1997

  • Mapping Deliberative Systems with Big Data

    Open Access•John Parkinson, Sebastian De Laile et al.•Political Studies•2022

  • Time's Up

    Open Access•Karlo Basta•Political Psychology•2020

  • Position, selective emphasis and framing

    Open Access•Anwen Elias, Edina Szöcsik et al.•Party Politics•2015

  • Articulations of populism and nationalism

    Juan Alberto Ruiz Casado•European Politics and Society•2019

  • Subtle discriminatory political discourse on immigration

    Open Access•Gema Rubio‐carbonero•Journal of Language and Politics•2020

  • Why do politicians cite others in political debates

    Open Access•Masaki Shibata•Journal of Language and Politics•2020

  • Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse

    Karin Bischof, Cornelia Ilie•Journal of Language and Politics•2018

  • The Populist Zeitgeist

    Open Access•Cas Mudde•Government and Opposition•2004

  • Ambivalences of populism

    Open Access•Daniel Gamper Sachse•Social Science Information•2018

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae