Leadership Studies of Chinese and Chinese-Americans
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2390765 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert D Meade (0000-0001-5922-4082, Center for Cross-Cultural Research, Western Washington State College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1970 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 325-332 |
| Publication date | 1970-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0221 • E-ISSN: 1552-5422 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/135910457000100404 |
| OpenAlex | W2166286558 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 7 |
Chinese college students in Hong Kong and Chinese-American college students in Hawaii ranked a list of 9 issues of critical concern to them and their college in terms of their relative importance. These students then met in groups of 6 with a group leader who had been trained in authoritarian, democratic and laissez-faire leadership atmospheres and who utilized one of these conditions. The group was required to discuss the 9 issues and arrive at a group ranking. Finally, all subjects ranked the same issues individually a second time. Intercorrelations between group and final individual rankings were made. With Chinese subjects, it was found that authoritarian leadership produced a greater degree of cohesiveness of judgment than laissez-faire or democratic. Male leaders produced greater cohesiveness of group judgment than females. Emergent male leaders appeared in the female laissez-faire conditions but not when the laissez-faire leader was male. With Chinese-Americans, both democratic and authoritarian leadership atmospheres produced a high level of group cohesion of judgment. Male leaders were more successful in this respect than females. No emergent leaders appeared in any of the conditions. Speculation concerning differences between Chinese and Chinese-Americans suggests that the latter have experienced both authoritarian as well as democratic leadership atmospheres and can adapt to either while Chinese in an authoritarian culture demonstrate more successful adaptation to authoritarian atmospheres
Authoritarian leadership style · Authoritarianism · Cohesion (chemistry · Democracy · Group cohesiveness · Political science · Politics · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Higher Education Research Studies · International Student and Expatriate Challenges · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions.
Guanxi Bases, Xinyong and Chinese Business Networks
The Influence of the Leader’s Creativity on the Employees’ Creativity
Cross-cultural small group research
Social Orientation and Individual Modernity among Chinese Students in Taiwan
The Effects of Work Environment and In-Group Membership on the Leadership Preferences of Anglo-Australians and Chinese Australians
A cross-cultural study of need profiles
Effects of participatory vs. supervisory leadership on group judgment
Authoritarianism and leadership choice in a military setting
A comparison of two types of leadership in various communication nets
The effects of varying combinations of authoritarian and equalitarian leaders and followers
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,12 |
| Citation span | 1977 - 2014 (38) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |