Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Engaging Children in Intervention Development - A Comparison of Four Qualitative Methods and Their Suitability to Elicit Information Relevant for Early Intervention Development

Bibliographic Data

ID2411580
AuthorsIsabella Pollak (0000-0001-9842-0385), Katharina A M Stiehl (0000-0002-2897-9092), Beate Schrank (0000-0002-9397-3076), James Birchwood (0000-0002-0505-3457), Ina Krammer (0000-0002-7514-3925), Marija Mitic (0000-0003-4495-5071), Jack Rogers, Jack C Rogers, Kate A Woodcock (0000-0002-8884-2020)
Year2023
Volume22
Publication date2023-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/16094069231204775
OpenAlexW4387587941
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited43

Stakeholder involvement in intervention development has become increasingly popular and is understood as crucial for successful implementation. However, methodological difficulties persist regarding the implementation of appropriate participatory methods to engage children and collect relevant information for intervention development. This paper discusses four creative, qualitative methods - a brainstorming task, an individual letter, a story-based task, and a focus group task - and compares their suitability to generate relevant information for early intervention development. These four methods were used in the early stages of a project aiming to develop a peer relationship intervention and were analysed using thematic analysis. Based on theoretical considerations, information categories (a) definition aspects, (b) context factors, and (c) change mechanisms were of interest, while (d) examples and experience and (e) additional information were identified as prevalent categories through inductive thematic analysis. Definition was a prevalent theme generated by the brainstorming task, although the sticky note format limited the depth of individual answers. The secret letter, which allowed children to share ideas privately, was found to be useful for generating more in-depth reflections on definitions and personal experiences. Stories and focus group discussions were found to be useful for generating varied context factors and change mechanisms, although stories also generated fictional elements and external solutions. Providing different qualitative methods and allowing children to choose how they prefer to communicate their thoughts proved important for collecting authentic, in-depth information

Brainstorming · Context (archaeology · Focus group · Intervention (counseling · Knowledge management · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Task (project management · Thematic analysis · Theme (computing · World Wide Web · Children's Rights and Participation · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Early Childhood Education and Development · Engineering · Psychology

  • Using “draw and tell” to support young people experiencing socio‐economic disadvantage in describing complex educational trajectories

    Open Access•Aoife Joy Keogh•Journal of Research on Adolescence•2026

  • Promoting Peer Connectedness Through Social-Emotional Learning

    Open Access•Isabella Pollak, Katharina A M Stiehl et al.•Journal of Youth and Adolescence•2024

  • Emotion comprehension between 3 and 11 years

    Francisco Pons, Paul L Harris et al.•European Journal of Developmental…•2004

  • Taxonomy of approaches to developing interventions to improve health

    Open Access•Alicia O’cathain, Liz Croot et al.•Pilot and Feasibility Studies•2019

  • Early adolescents' perspectives on factors that facilitate and hinder friendship development with peers at the time of school transition

    Open Access•Ina Krammer, Beate Schrank et al.•Journal of School Psychology•2023

  • Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

    Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Sport and…•2019

  • A Review of Approaches, Strategies and Ethical Considerations in Participatory Research With Children

    Open Access•M Montreuil, Aline Bogossian et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Development of a framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions

    Open Access•Jemma Hawkins, Kim Madden et al.•BMC Public Health•2017

  • Focus Groups Can Be Fun”

    Open Access•E Colucci•Qualitative Health Research•2007

  • The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people

    Open Access•Caroline Bradbury-Jones, Louise Isham et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2018

  • Research With Children

    Open Access•Montserrat Fargas-Malet, Dominic Mcsherry et al.•Journal of Early Childhood Research•2010

  • The Participatory Zeitgeist

    V J Palmer, Wayne Weavell et al.•Medical Humanities•2018

  • The Children's Delphi

    Open Access•Elizabeth Benninger, Shazly Savahl•Child & Family Social Work•2016

  • TikTok Is My Life and Snapchat Is My Ventricle”

    Open Access•Gloria Mittmann, Kate A Woodcock et al.•The Journal of Early Adolescence•2021

  • Is it fun?” developing children centred research methods

    Open Access•J Barker, Weller et al.•International Journal of…•2003

  • Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID)

    Open Access•Daniel Wight, Erica Wimbush et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2016

  • Self‐regulation and metacognition in young children

    Open Access•Sue Robson•British Educational Research…•2016

  • Small Shoes, Big Steps! Empowering Children as Active Researchers

    Open Access•Mary Kellett•American Journal of Community…•2010

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Problematizing "Play-for-Health" Discourses Through Children's Photo-Elicited Narratives

    Open Access•Stephanie A Alexander, Stéphanie Alexander et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2014

  • The limits of children's voices

    Open Access•Spyros Spyrou•Childhood•2011

  • Challenging Power Dynamics and Eliciting Marginalized Adolescent Voices Through Qualitative Methods

    Open Access•K Pincock, Nicola Jones•International Journal of…•2020

  • A Qualitative Interview With Young Children

    Open Access•Yael Ponizovsky-Bergelson, Yael Dayan et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Janice M Morse, Michael Barrett et al.•International Journal of…•2002

  • Beyond the standard interview

    Open Access•Anna Bagnoli•Qualitative Research•2009

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae