Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Judicial policies

Implementation and Impact

Dados Bibliográficos

ID24197476
AutoresBradley C Canon, Charles A Johnson (0000-0002-1975-2005)
Ano1999
Páginas256
Data de publicação1999-01-01
Open AccessNão
TipoBOOK
PeriódicoJudicial policies (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditoraCQ Press (PUBLISHER)
Open LibraryOL373023M
ISBN9781568023069
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas114

Administration · Administration of Justice · Central government policies · Civil procedure · Courts · Courts - General · Courts & procedure · Current Events · Government - Legislative Branch · Judicial process · Justice · LAW · Politics · Processus judiciaire · united states · USA

  • Keepers of the Covenant or Platonic Guardians? Decision Making on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Richard L Pacelle, Bryan W Marshall et al.•American Politics Research•2007

  • After the Supreme Word

    Open Access•Michael A Unger•American Politics Research•2008

  • Policy, Politics, and Public Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Stephen D Ansolabehere et al.•American Politics Research•2020

  • Ghostwriters on the Court

    Open Access•Paul J Wahlbeck, James F Spriggs et al.•American Politics Research•2002

  • Strategic Selection of Legal Instruments on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Chad M King•American Politics Research•2007

  • Strategic Anticipation and the Hierarchy of Justice in U.S. District Courts

    Open Access•Kirk A Randazzo•American Politics Research•2008

  • Uncertain Precedent

    Open Access•Pamela C Corley•American Politics Research•2009

  • Economic Governance on Trial

    Open Access•Diana Kapiszewski•Latin American Politics and Society•2013

  • Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes

    Open Access•Donald R Songer, Reginald S Sheehan•The Western Political Quarterly•1990

  • Judicial Policy-Making and Implementation

    Open Access•Traciel V Reid•The Western Political Quarterly•1988

  • Congressional Committees and the Federal Courts

    Open Access•Mark Crispin Miller•The Western Political Quarterly•1992

  • Case Selection in Judicial Impact Research

    Donald R Songer•The Western Political Quarterly•1988

  • Policymaking and the Modern Court

    Open Access•Thomas R Marshall, T Marshall•The Western Political Quarterly•1989

  • The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany

    Open Access•Georg Vanberg•Politics of Constitutional Review…•2004

  • Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•American Politics Quarterly•1992

  • Políticas Públicas Judiciais

    Open Access•Ricardo Ribeiro, Ricardo Silveira Ribeiro•Direito Processo e Cidadania•2022

  • Wpływ opinii publicznej na orzecznictwo amerykańskiego Sądu Najwyższego

    Open Access•Jacek Srokosz•Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i…•2025

  • Specialized Courts, Bureaucratic Agencies, and the Politics of U.S. Trade Policy

    Wendy L Hansen, Renee J Johnson et al.•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • The Effect of Opinion Readability on the Impact of U.S. Supreme Court Precedents in State High Courts

    Open Access•Michael P Fix, Bailey R Fairbanks•Social Science Quarterly•2020

  • The Catalytic Effect of a Federal Court Decision on a State Legislature

    Open Access•Kathryn Mo, Kathryn Moss•Law & Society Review•1985

  • Compensation and Compliance

    Open Access•Ezequiel González-Ocantos, Elias Dinas•Law & Society Review•2019

  • Law, Politics, and Judicial Decision Making

    Open Access•Charles A Johnson•Law & Society Review•1987

  • Evaluating Legality

    Open Access•Idit Kostiner•Law & Society Review•2003

  • The Impact of Judicial Opinion Language on the Transmission of Federal Circuit Court Precedents

    Open Access•Robert J Hume•Law & Society Review•2009

  • The Precedent That Wasn't

    Open Access•Jon B Gould•Law & Society Review•2001

  • On Politics, Constitutional Interpretation, and Abortion Rights Jurisprudence

    Open Access•Gayle Binion•Law & Society Review•1997

  • The U.S. Supreme Court's Incorporation and Interpretation of Precedent

    Open Access•James F Spriggs, Thomas G Hansford•Law & Society Review•2002

  • Another Look at No-Fault Divorce and the Post-Divorce Finances of Women

    Open Access•Herbert Jacob•Law & Society Review•1989

  • The authority of Supreme Court precedent

    Open Access•J H Fowler, Sangick Jeon•Social Networks•2008

  • The weakness of strong policies and the strength of weak policies

    Open Access•Scott L Greer•Regulation & Governance•2011

  • Canons of Ethics and Accountability in State Supreme Court Elections

    Open Access•C Scott Peters•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2009

  • Destabilization rights and restabilization politics

    Scott L Greer, Simone Rauscher•Journal of European Public Policy•2011

  • Thesupremecourt Inamericanpolitics

    Lawrence Baum•Annual Review of Political Science•2003

  • The Supreme Court and Morality Policy Adoption in the American States

    Open Access•Dana Patton•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Judicial Policymaking in Published and Unpublished Decisions

    Open Access•Evan J Ringquist, Craig E Emmert•Political Research Quarterly•1999

  • The Resilience of Affirmative Action in the 1980s

    Open Access•Daniel N Lipson•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Getting Attention

    Open Access•C Scott Peters•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • The Influence of Precedent on State Supreme Courts

    Open Access•Benjamin Kassow, Benjamin J Kassow et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • A Conditional Model of Opinion Assignment on the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Forrest Maltzman, Paul J Wahlbeck•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • The Persuasive Power of Russian Courts

    Open Access•Vanessa A Baird, Debra Javeline•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Reassessing the Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Opinion

    Open Access•James W Stoutenborough, Donald P Haider-Markel et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • The Impact of Permissive Judicial Policies

    Open Access•Henry R Glick•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Congressional Attacks on Supreme Court Rulings Involving Unconstitutional State Laws

    Open Access•James Meernik, Joseph Ignagni•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • Explaining Congressional Attempts to Reverse Supreme Court Decisions

    Open Access•Joseph Ignagni, James Meernik•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions

    Open Access•James F Spriggs•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • What Judges Want

    Lawrence Baum•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Measuring Case Salience in State Courts of Last Resort

    Open Access•Richard L Vining, Teena Wilhelm•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • The Prestige of Australian State Supreme Courts Over the 20th Century

    Russell Smyth, Vinod Mishra•Australian Journal of Political…•2010

  • Constitutional courts as veto players

    Open Access•Mary L Volcansek•European Journal of Political…•2001

  • Integration in Chicago Forty Years After Brown

    Pierre deVise•Urban Geography•1994

  • The Politics of Legal Representation

    Open Access•Mark Kessler•Law & Policy•1986

  • Citations to Authority in Supreme Court Opinions

    Open Access•Charles A Johnson•Law & Policy•1985

  • Gender, Critical Mass, and Judicial Decision Making

    Open Access•Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins Jr et al.•Law & Policy•2010

  • Bargaining and the effectiveness of international criminal regimes

    Open Access•Emily Hencken Ritter, Scott Wolford•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2012

  • Perceived legitimacy of Supreme Court decisions

    Open Access•Jeffery J Mondak•Political Behavior•1990

  • Law, Policymaking, and the Policy Process

    Open Access•Stephen Barclay, Scott Barclay et al.•Policy Studies Journal•1998

  • Personal, Organizational and Environmental Factors Influencing Judges' Preferences for Mediation Versus Litigation

    Open Access•Jennifer Mastrofski, Jennifer Adams Mastrofski et al.•Policy Studies Journal•1988

  • NCLB Accountability Collides With Court-Ordered Desegregation

    Elizabeth DeBray, Elizabeth H DeBray•Peabody Journal of Education•2005

  • Judges, courts and policy‐making in Western Europe

    Mary L Volcansek•West European Politics•1992

  • Selection Tests and Equal Opportunity

    Open Access•Donald W Crowley•Administration & Society•1985

  • Policy Convergence in a Federal Judicial System

    John C Kilwein, Richard A Brisbin•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • The Supreme Court and Criminal Justice Disputes

    Lee Epstein, Thomas G Walker et al.•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • The Hierarchy of Justice

    Donald R Songer, Jeffrey A Segal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • One Voice Among Many

    Roy B Flemming, John Bohte et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Judicial Review and Coordinate Construction of the Constitution

    James Meernik, Joseph Ignagni•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies

    James F Spriggs•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Courts, Agencies, and Congressional Committees

    Open Access•Mark Crispin Miller•The Review of Politics•1993

  • Does School Finance Litigation Cause Taxpayer Revolt?Serranoand Proposition 13

    Open Access•Isaac Martins, Isaac William Martins et al.•Law & Society Review•2006

  • Naming Names

    Open Access•Scott S Boddery, Laura P Moyer et al.•Law & Society Review•2019

  • The Development of a Legal Rule

    Open Access•Paul J Wahlbeck•Law & Society Review•1998

  • Human Rights in an Era of Neoliberal Globalization

    Open Access•Cheryl Holzmeyer•Law & Society Review•2009

  • The Impact of Supreme Court Activity on the Judicial Agenda

    Open Access•Deborah Rice, Douglas Rice•Law & Society Review•2014

  • Legal Mobilization for Social Reform

    Open Access•Mark Kessler•Law & Society Review•1990

  • The Impact of Legal Mobilization and Judicial Decisions

    Open Access•Troy Q Riddell, Troy Riddell•Law & Society Review•2004

  • Legislating Adequacy

    Open Access•Jessica Pearson, Nancy Thoennes et al.•Law & Society Review•1989

  • The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government

    Open Access•Lee Epstein, Olga Shvetsova et al.•Law & Society Review•2001

  • Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court

    James L Gibson, Gregory A Caldeira•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Recruitment of Chief Justices on State Supreme Courts

    Laura Langer, Jody Mcmullen et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • The Life of the Law

    Paul J Wahlbeck•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • Overruled

    Sara C Benesh, Malia Reddick•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • Interest-Group Litigation in Federal District Court

    Susan M Olson•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • The Religious Right in Court

    Donald R Songer, Susan J Tabrizi•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • The Impact of the Supreme Court on Trends in Economic Policy Making in the United States Courts of Appeals

    Donald R Songer•The Journal of Politics•1987

  • Courting the Public

    James R Zink, James F Spriggs et al.•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited

    Kevin T Mcguire, James A Stimson•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Political Responsiveness and Equity in Public Education Finance

    B Dan Wood, Nick A Theobald•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Necessary but Not Sufficient

    Liliana M Garces•The Journal of Higher Education•2012

  • Political Power and Judicial Review in Italy

    Open Access•Mary L Volcansek•Comparative Political Studies•1994

  • The Quixotic Search for Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Scott D Gerber, Keeok Park•American Political Science Review•1997

  • Republican Schoolmaster

    Open Access•Charles H Franklin, Liane Kosaki et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

  • On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making

    Open Access•Tracey E George, Lee Epstein•American Political Science Review•1992

  • Strategic Policy Considerations and Voting Fluidity on the Burger Court

    Open Access•Forrest Maltzman, Paul J Wahlbeck•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Teaching the irrelevance of law on criminal procedure

    Christopher E Smith•Journal of Criminal Justice…•1996

  • The Implementation of Supreme Court Precedent

    Open Access•Ethan D Boldt, Michael C Gizzi•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Listening to competing speakers

    Open Access•Giuliano Espino•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2022

  • The role of bureaucrats in designing policy outcomes

    Open Access•Assaf Meydani•International Journal of Law in…•2015

  • Resistance to Legality

    Open Access•Richard A Brisbin•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2010

  • Mind the Gap

    Open Access•Jon B Gould, Scott Barclay•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2012

  • Law and Social Movements

    Michael Mccann•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2006

Obras citantes distintas114
Citações por ano2,78
Intervalo de citações1985 - 2025 (41)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoSim
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 101
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae