Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Relative clauses in Moksha

Raising by reprojection

Bibliographic Data

ID24213815
AuthorsMariia Privizentseva (0000-0002-2660-9944)
Year2026
Volume44
Issue4
Publication date2026-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNatural Language and Linguistic Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0167-806X • E-ISSN: 1573-0859
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11049-026-09722-7
OpenAlexW7215089985
LanguageEN
References cited86

This paper presents novel data on relative clauses with inverse case attraction in Moksha Mordvin. This is a rare type of externally-headed relative clauses where the head noun bears case assigned inside the relative clause (see Bianchi 1999, 2000b, Kholodilova 2013, Deal 2016, Wood et al. 2017, Abramovitz 2021). On the basis of a correlation between a case marking on the head noun and reconstruction effects (idioms, anaphor binding, condition C), I argue that raising derivation of relative clauses is a part of natural language syntax (Schachter 1973, Vergnaud 1974, Kayne 1994, de Vries 2002, Sportiche 2017, i.a.) and that it co-exists with the head-external derivation (cf. Sauerland 1998, 2003, Bhatt 2002, Harris 2008, Jarvis 2025 for co-existence of several relative clause derivations). The paper then proposes a novel implementation of the raising derivation, according to which the head NP projects upon its movement to the main clause. Such projecting movement follows from projection-by-selection approach to labeling (Chomsky 1995, Stabler 1997, Adger 2003) combined with the possibility of upward search (Baker 2008, Zeijlstra 2012).

case marking · Condition C · idiom interpretation · moksha · Mordvinic languages · relative clauses · reprojection · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Language Development and Disorders · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Phases

    Klaus Abels•Phases•2012

  • Consequences of Antisymmetry

    Valentina Bianchi•Consequences of Antisymmetry•1999

  • Russian Case Morphology and the Syntactic Categories

    David Pesetsky•Russian Case Morphology And The…•2013

  • Locality in WH Quantification

    Open Access•Veneeta Dayal•Locality in WH Quantification•1996

  • Core Syntax

    David Adger•Core syntax•2003

  • The Syntax of Agreement and Concord

    Open Access•Mark C Baker•Syntax of Agreement and Concord•2008

  • The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features

    David Pesetsky, Esther Torrego•Phrasal and Clausal Architecture•2007

  • On Phases

    Noam Chomsky•Foundational Issues in Linguistic…•2008

  • Rules and representations

    Open Access•Noam Chomsky•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1980

  • Problems of projection

    Noam Chomsky•Structures, strategies and beyond•2015

  • Possession in Germanic

    Lars-Olof Delsing•Possessors, Predicates and…•1998

  • Syntactic Structures

    Noam Chomsky•Syntactic Structures•1957

  • The Noun Phrase

    Anna Szabolcsi•The Syntactic Structure of…•1994

  • The Case of German relatives

    Karin Pittner•The Linguistic Review•1995

  • There is only one way to agree

    Hedde Zeijlstra•The Linguistic Review•2012

  • A derivational ellipsis approach to ATB-movement

    Martin Salzmann•The Linguistic Review•2012

  • The syntax of relative clauses in Croatian

    Martina Gračanin-Yuksek•The Linguistic Review•2013

  • Backwards Ellipsis is Right Node Raising

    Open Access•Seungwan Ha•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•2008

  • The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses

    Valentina Bianchi•Linguistic Inquiry•2000

  • The matching effect in resumption

    Open Access•Dieter Georgi, Martin Salzmann•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2017

  • DP structure and internally headed relatives in Washo

    Open Access•Emily A Hanink•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2021

  • Raising and head-external relatives in Atchan

    Open Access•Rebecca Jarvis•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2025

  • Closest conjunct agreement is an illusion

    Open Access•Andrew Murphy, Zorica Puškar•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2018

  • The syntax and semantics of correlatives

    Open Access•Veneeta Srivastav•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1991

  • The whole picture

    Open Access•Isabelle Charnavel, Shannon Bryant•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2023

  • Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase

    Zeljko Boskovic•Linguistic Inquiry•2014

  • Icelandic Control Really Is A-Movement

    Cedric Boeckx, Norbert Hornstein et al.•Linguistic Inquiry•2010

  • Omnivorous third person agreement in Algonquian

    Open Access•Peter Grishin•Glossa a journal of general…•2022

  • Problems of projection

    Open Access•Noam Chomsky•Lingua•2013

  • The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses

    Open Access•Rajesh Bhatt•Natural Language Semantics•2002

  • Deriving the anaphor-agreement effect and the violations of it

    Open Access•Gurujegan Murugesan•Syntax•2022

  • Relativization in Dàgáárè and its typological implications

    Open Access•Adams Bodomo, Adams B Bodomo et al.•Lingua•2010

  • The syntax and semantics of english relative clauses

    Open Access•James D Mccawley•Lingua•1981

  • Missing labels

    Open Access•Barbara Citko•Lingua•2008

  • Primitives of Binding

    Eric Reuland•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  • Agreement and DP-Internal Feature Distribution

    Open Access•Gabi Danon•Syntax•2011

  • Strange Relatives of the Third Kind

    Open Access•Alexander Grosu, Fred Landman•Natural Language Semantics•1998

  • Sorting out Relative Clauses

    Open Access•Sarah Hulsey, Uli Sauerland•Natural Language Semantics•2006

  • Correlatives

    Open Access•Adrian Brasoveanu•Language and Linguistics Compass•2012

  • Towards a More Articulated Typology of Internally Headed Relative Constructions

    Open Access•Alexander Grosu•Language and Linguistics Compass•2012

  • Wholesale Late Merger

    Shoichi Takahashi, Sarah Hulsey•Linguistic Inquiry•2009

  • Movement Operations after Syntax

    David Embick, Rolf Noyer•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  • Anatomy of a Counterexample

    Ivy Sichel•Linguistic Inquiry•2018

  • Cyclicity and Connectivity in Nez Perce Relative Clauses

    Amy Rose Deal•Linguistic Inquiry•2016

  • Opaque Intervention

    Fabian Heck, Anke Himmelreich•Linguistic Inquiry•2017

  • Relabeling Heads

    Caterina Donati, Carlo Cecchetto•Linguistic Inquiry•2011

  • On "Dative Idioms" in English

    Richard K Larson•Linguistic Inquiry•2017

  • Checking Up on (φ-)Agree

    Bronwyn M Bjorkman, Hedde Zeijlstra•Linguistic Inquiry•2019

  • Patterns of Movement Reflexes as the Result of the Order of Merge and Agree

    Dieter Georgi, Doreen Georgi•Linguistic Inquiry•2017

  • Anaphor Binding

    Isabelle Charnavel, Dominique Sportiche•Linguistic Inquiry•2016

  • Why the Binding Theory Doesn't Apply at LF

    Open Access•Glyn Hicks•Syntax•2008

  • Ergatives Move Too Early

    Open Access•Anke Assmann, Dieter Georgi et al.•Syntax•2015

  • A Formalization of Minimalist Syntax

    Open Access•Chris Collins, Edward P Stabler et al.•Syntax•2016

  • Noun-Phrase Structure by Reprojection

    Open Access•Dieter Georgi, Doreen Georgi et al.•Syntax•2010

  • On Deriving CED Effects from the PIC

    G Muller•Linguistic Inquiry•2010

  • On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree

    Zeljko Boskovic•Linguistic Inquiry•2007

  • Multiple Case Checking

    Open Access•Susana Bejar, Diane Massam•Syntax•1999

  • Interaction, Satisfaction, and the PCC

    Amy Rose Deal•Linguistic Inquiry•2023

  • Idioms

    Geoffrey Nunberg, Ivan A Sag et al.•Language•1994

  • Focus and Relativization

    Paul Schachter•Language•1973

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae