Un-Priming Politics
A Method to Reduce Overreporting of Political Engagement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24213852 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elizabeth C Connors (0000-0002-5442-1420), John V Kane (0000-0002-6720-8071) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-07 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0190-9320 • E-ISSN: 1573-6687 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11109-026-10200-4 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 48 |
Survey researchers frequently employ measures of political engagement, yet social desirability pressures can lead to overreporting. Building upon existing literature, we adopt an iterative approach to determine how such overreporting can be reduced. Four preregistered survey experiments were conducted (total N=7,122). We first confirm that social desirability considerations can underlie some types of self-reported political engagement. Second, having tested a variety of interventions that were designed to reduce overreporting, we find that our most effective treatment ( Dampen Politics) was one that aimed to decrease the salience of politics. This treatment significantly reduced (1) the degree to which respondents perceived the survey as political, and (2) some types of self-reported political engagement, particularly political interest and voting. We tested alternative implementations of the Dampen Politics treatment, each time assessing its robustness and validity. Our findings suggest a simple adjustment in survey wording and organization can meaningfully decrease overreporting of political engagement.
To Vote or Not to Vote
Social Pressure on Social Media
Social Desirability and Self-Reports
Social Desirability and Response Validity
Response Validity in Surveys of Voting Behavior
Response Validity
How Transparency Affects Survey Responses
How Social Desirability Response Bias May Lead to an Overestimation of Obama-Trump Voters
Measuring Voter Turnout By Using The Randomized Response Technique
Saving Face
Correcting surveys for non-response and measurement error using auxiliary information
More than meets the ITT
You’ve Either Got It or You Don’t? The Stability of Political Interest over the Life Cycle
Improving Media Effects Research through Better Measurement of News Exposure
Are Voting Norms Conditional? How Electoral Context and Peer Behavior Shape the Social Returns to Voting
Social Desirability and Affective Polarization
Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires
Assessing the Mechanisms of Misreporting to Filter Questions in Surveys
Measuring Voter Registration and Turnout in Surveys
Does it Matter if Respondents Look up Answers to Political Knowledge Questions
Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports
Can Changes in Context Reduce Vote Overreporting in Surveys
Overreporting Voting
Reducing Vote Overreporting in Surveys
Survey Attention and Self-Reported Political Behavior
Good Excuses
Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implications for Research
Analyze the attentive and bypass bias
Positive Social Pressure and Prosocial Motivation
The Social Dimension of Political Values
Civic Duty and Voter Turnout
An Experiment Testing the Relative Effectiveness of Encouraging Voter Participation by Inducing Feelings of Pride or Shame
Educational Attainment and Social Norms of Voting
Using Cell-phone Mobility Data to Study Voter Turnout
To Participate or Not to Participate
Beyond rationalization
No Harm in Checking
What Motivates Reasoning? A Theory of Goal‐Dependent Political Evaluation
A focus theory of normative conduct
Social Pressure and Voter Turnout
Who Overreports Voting
A Theory of the Calculus of Voting
When to Worry about Sensitivity Bias
| Highly cited | No |
|---|