Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

One Nuclear Umbrella, Two Security Commitments

Bibliographic Data

ID24224487
AuthorsJihwan Hwang
Year2026
Pages1-35
Publication date2026-10-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Survey (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0004-4687 • E-ISSN: 1533-838X
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/as.2026.3181058
OpenAlexW7221813226
LanguageEN
References cited43

Why have Japan and South Korea, despite sharing the same US nuclear umbrella, developed distinct extended deterrence arrangements? Previous studies emphasize US-driven, supply-side explanations but fail to explain the persistent divergence between the two allies. I argue that extended deterrence is co-produced by junior allies’ demand, which is shaped by two key variables: external threat and domestic nuclear constraint. Developing a demand-side model and applying it to a comparative historical analysis of Japan and South Korea from the Cold War to the present, I demonstrate that South Korea’s higher threat perception and weaker nuclear constraints, in contrast to Japan’s lower threat perception and stronger domestic constraints, have generated divergent demands for extended deterrence. The study contributes to the literature by shifting attention to demand-side dynamics and offering a theory of differentiated extended deterrence within asymmetric alliances.

asymmetric alliances · Cold war · extended deterrence · Japan · security commitments · South Korea · threat perception · US nuclear umbrella · US-Japan alliance · US-South Korea alliance · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Nuclear Issues and Defense

  • Balance of Power Redux

    Open Access•Eliza Gheorghe•The Chinese Journal of…•2022

  • Recalcitrance and initiative

    Arthur A Stein•International Relations of the…•2013

  • Strategies of Extended Deterrence

    Open Access•Do Young Lee•Security Studies•2021

  • Public Opinion, Party Politics and Alliance

    Akira Kurosaki•The International History Review•2019

  • The Domestic Politics of Nuclear Choices—A Review Essay

    Elizabeth N Saunders•International Security•2019

  • Vulnerable US Alliances in Northeast Asia

    Eric Heginbotham, Richard J Samuels•The Washington Quarterly•2021

  • Japan’s Nuclear Balance

    Ryoya Ishimoto•The Washington Quarterly•2025

  • Reducing Nuclear Salience

    Lauren Sukin, Toby Dalton•The Washington Quarterly•2021

  • Why Japan Will Not Go Nuclear (Yet)

    Llewelyn Hughes•International Security•2007

  • To Arm or to Ally? The Patron's Dilemma and the Strategic Logic of Arms Transfers and Alliances

    Keren Yarhi-Milo, Alexander Lanoszka et al.•International Security•2016

  • Alliance Coercion and Nuclear Restraint

    Gene Gerzhoy•International Security•2015

  • Veto Players, Nuclear Energy, and Nonproliferation

    Jacques E C Hymans•International Security•2011

  • The Showdown That Wasn't

    Galen Jackson•International Security•2015

  • Strategies of Inhibition

    Francis J Gavin•International Security•2015

  • Nuclear Weapons and Existential Threats

    Bryan R Early, Victor Asal•Comparative Strategy•2014

  • Alliance strategy

    Yaacov Bar‐siman‐tov•Journal of Strategic Studies•1980

  • The Evolution of US Extended Deterrence and South Korea’s Nuclear Ambitions

    Se Young Jang•Journal of Strategic Studies•2016

  • Loyalty, hedging, or exit

    Jasen J Castillo, Alexander B Downes•Journal of Strategic Studies•2023

  • Japan and Extended Nuclear Deterrence

    Fintan Hoey•Journal of Strategic Studies•2016

  • The US and South Korea

    Adam Mount•Survival•2023

  • International patron-client relationships

    Open Access•Christopher P Carney•Studies in Comparative…•1989

  • Japan’s Nuclear Hedge

    Open Access•Richard J Samuels, James L Schoff•Political Science Quarterly•2015

  • Extended nuclear deterrence in East Asia

    Open Access•Andrew O’neil, Andrew O'Neil•International Affairs•2011

  • Correlates of South Korean Public Opinion on Nuclear Proliferation

    Sangyong Son, Man‐sung Yim et al.•Asian Survey•2021

  • Network Connections and the Emergence of the Hub-and-Spokes Alliance System in East Asia

    Yasuhiro Izumikawa•International Security•2020

  • Outside the Wire

    Open Access•Michael A Allen, Michael E Flynn et al.•American Political Science Review•2020

  • Trump 2.0 and North Korea

    David C Kang, Noelle C Troutman•Asian Survey•2025

  • Strategy of Anchoring

    Open Access•Ayumi Teraoka•Asian Survey•2025

  • US–South Korean Relations at a Crossroads

    Yong Chool Ha, Wang Hwi Lee•Asian Survey•2025

  • Under the Umbrella

    Open Access•David M Allison, Stephen Herzog et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2022

  • Signaling Foreign Policy Interests

    Open Access•James D Fearon•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1997

  • Credible Nuclear Security Commitments Can Backfire

    Open Access•Lauren Sukin•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2020

  • Promises under Pressure

    Open Access•Brian Blankenship•International Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Why is There No Nato in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism

    Open Access•Christopher Hemmer, Peter J Katzenstein•International Organization•2002

  • Signaling Alliance Commitments

    Open Access•Matthew Fuhrmann, Todd S Sechser•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Why is there no Nato in Asia?’ revisited

    Open Access•Kai He, Huiyun Feng•European Journal of International…•2012

  • Rewarding loyalty

    Open Access•Yasuki Kudo•Journal of Peace Research•2024

  • Japan's National Security Council

    Mayumi Fukushima, Richard J Samuels•International Affairs•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae