Norms, national identity, and public support for prosecuting soldiers who deliberately kill civilians
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24225200 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Niheer Dasandi (0000-0002-8708-837X, University of Birmingham), Neil J Mitchell (0000-0003-0744-984X, Department of Political Science, University College London , London) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 78-85 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jopres/xjaf004 |
| OpenAlex | W7124866403 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 40 |
Recent evidence suggests that public support for holding soldiers accountable for war crimes and human rights violations is conditional on the national identity of the soldier. We investigate how information about the status and application of humanitarian and human rights norms, in ways that draw on national identity, might reduce bias in prosecuting soldiers who kill civilians. Using survey experiments in the United States and the United Kingdom, we find that among our four norm-reinforcing information treatments, only references to principled conduct by close and like-minded allies can significantly increase public willingness to prosecute and uphold the rule of law in both countries, although this finding is highly dependent on the specific ally referenced. Depending on the context and application, highlighting national outgroup violations and potential hypocrisy by leveraging the timing of the survey to capture the abuse of Ukrainians by Russian soldiers, at least temporarily increased the willingness to prosecute in the United States. Otherwise, leveraging pride in the military to reinforce norms, or informing the public about their government's commitment to these norms does little to alter attitudes. Although communicating norms in ways that have cultural and national salience has the potential to strengthen public commitment to accountability, where there are strong preexisting partisan and national loyalties it is difficult to do so.
human rights standards · humanitarian norms · National identity · partisan loyalty · Rule of law · Russian invasion of Ukraine · war crimes prosecution · International Law and Human Rights · Social and Intergroup Psychology · War, Law, and Justice
The relational politics of shame
The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms
Power of Human Rights
Nudgeability
Nudges that fail
Measuring Norms and Normative Contestation
Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms
The flag and the stick
Revisiting Hiroshima in Iran
Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power
The Stopping Power of Norms
Increased support for collective defence in times of threat
How Sudan’s ‘rogue’ state label shaped US responses to the Darfur conflict
State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics)
Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity
Human Rights and Public Support for War
Loyalty or Accountability? Public Attitudes to Holding Soldiers Accountable for the Murder and Abuse of Civilians
Electoral Rules and Incentives to Protect Human Rights
Public Reactions to International Legal Institutions
Threat Perception and American Support for Torture
Thinking Inside the Box
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Anarchy is what states make of it
International Law and Public Attitudes Toward Torture
The Laws of War and Public Support for Foreign Combatants
Cosmopolitan Patriotism as a Civic Ideal
Hawks, Doves, and Peace
Violence, Nonviolence, and the Effects of International Human Rights Law
Attitudes toward the Use of Force
A Bottom‐Up Theory of Public Opinion about Foreign Policy
Conceptualizing and assessing norm strength in International Relations
The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders
How Ideas Spread
International law, military effectiveness, and public support for drone strikes
The moral foundations of restraint
| Highly cited | No |
|---|