From plan to plate
Assessing food systems and equity considerations in historical and contemporary comprehensive plans from four U.S. cities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24227231 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yeeli Mui (0000-0002-5101-4096), Kelsey Crawford (0009-0004-5258-5327), Hameenat Adekoya, Julia A Wolfson (0000-0001-9155-2609), Keshia Pollack Porter, Jessica C Jones-Smith (0000-0001-8962-1695) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 179 |
| Pages | 107676 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0264-2751 • E-ISSN: 1873-6084 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cities.2026.107676 |
| OpenAlex | W7221773740 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 49 |
Urban planning is a structural driver of health, shaping environments that influence everyday activities and resources that can enable or inhibit health, including food systems. Yet, the extent to which comprehensive plans support equity and how this has evolved remains underexplored. This study analyzes historical and contemporary comprehensive plans from four U.S. cities—Chicago, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and New York City—to assess how equity orientation and food equity considerations have changed over time. Using a structured evaluation instrument comprising 57 indicators, we assess changes in plan strength, comprehensiveness, and content. Results show that while equity orientation has generally improved—most notably through stronger vision statements—food equity considerations remain uneven and fragmented. Nutritional adequacy, spatial equity, and food affordability are increasingly addressed, whereas culturally preferred foods, social equity, and agency remain underrepresented. Notably, improvements in general equity orientation did not always correspond with enhanced food equity measures. Further, comprehensive planning continues to lack public participation processes and often falls short in specifying how proposed actions will be operationalized and monitored. Findings underscore the need for more comprehensive, accountable, and community-informed planning approaches that center marginalized voices and address the structural determinants of food insecurity. We recommend strategies for embedding equity more deeply into both the content and processes of comprehensive and food systems planning, including participatory governance, equity-focused evaluation, and systems thinking.
Comprehensive planning · food access · food deserts · food equity · Food systems · Land-use planning · municipal planning documents · Urban agriculture · urban food policy · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability · Urban Planning and Governance
Structural Racism and Health Inequities
The Food System
Evaluation of Strategic Plans
Searching for the Good Plan
Mapping Prejudice
Planning for Regional Food Equity
Are We Planning for Equity
Plan Evaluation
Cultural Dimensions of Food Insecurity among Immigrants and Refugees
Equitable Deliberative Participation Design
Acquisition, mobility and food insecurity
Structural racism and geographic access to food retailers in the United States
Examining the Impact of Structural Racism on Food Insecurity
Racial/ethnic segregation and health disparities
The structural roots of food insecurity
Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research
Equity Planning Revisited
Plan Quality Evaluation 1994–2012
Evaluating the Quality of Official Community Plans in Southern British Columbia
Refuge in new food environments? The role of urban planning in facilitating food equity for new Americans
Viewpoint
Confronting the Challenges in Reconnecting Urban Planning and Public Health
A Rights-Based Approach to Food Insecurity in the United States
Reconceiving Environmental Justice
What does it mean to do food justice
| Highly cited | No |
|---|