Third-party mentions and action forwarding in police interviews
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24227644 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marijana Cerović (0000-0002-0487-3023), Sandra Vukasojević (0009-0005-4612-5655) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 266 |
| Pages | 43-58 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Pragmatics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0378-2166 • E-ISSN: 1879-1387 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2026.09.006 |
| OpenAlex | W7221528230 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 23 |
This paper examines how police interviewers use references to non-present third parties as interactional resources for accomplishing institutional goals in interviews with suspects. Drawing on 24 police interviews analysed using conversation analysis, the study focuses on sequences in which detectives pursue admissions or other case-relevant actions. The analysis identifies four recurrent practices accomplished through third-party references: testing the veracity of accounts, establishing relational links as preliminary, challenging accounts through third-party statements and invoking moral accountability. These practices involve turns which are formatted as information-seeking or knowledge-claiming moves, while simultaneously projecting institutionally consequential implications. The findings highlight the central role of the epistemic and moral domains in shaping action formation and institutional trajectories in police interviews.
admissions · institutional goals · moral accountability · police detectives · police interviews · suspect interviews · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Policing Practices and Perceptions
An Interactional Structure of Medical Activities During Acute Visits and Its Implications for Patients' Participation
“I don’t Remember that”
The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse
The Interactional Dynamics of Eliciting a Confession in a Dutch Police Interrogation
What Happened
Epistemics in Action
Who said what? Epistemological positioning in police investigative interview reports
The Terms of Agreement
Look'-prefaced turns in first and second position
The Epistemic Engine
Mobilizing Response
Police officers’ management of suspects’ I don’t know responses in Chinese investigative interviews
Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds
Epistemic status and the recognizability of social actions
Introduction
Some I don’t remember and some I do
Did you have permission to smash your neighbour's door?' Silly questions and their answers in police-suspect interrogations
Grammar and Social Organization
Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault
A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|