Performing sustainability across socio-economic groups
Consumption, class and inequality in Norway
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24230460 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ulrikke Wethal (0000-0002-9041-3583, University of Oslo), Arve Hansen (University of Oslo), Gisle Solbu (0000-0003-3432-1382, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Sara Heidenreich (0000-0003-2524-8080, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Cornelius Heyes (Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Robert Næss (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-16 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Consumer Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1469-5405 • E-ISSN: 1741-2900 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14695405261494986 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 47 |
There is a pressing need for rapid sustainability transformations that are simultaneously fair and inclusive. Research has demonstrated how climate emissions to a large degree follow patterns of income levels and lifestyles. Still broader sustainability discourses tend to ignore uncomfortable questions regarding inequality and class. This paper seeks to shed light on inequality dynamics in sustainability research, exploring how sustainability is understood and performed at the household level, how these dynamics are differentiated across income groups, and what potential tensions may arise across class. The analysis is based on extensive qualitative interviews and workshops with low-, middle- and high-income groups in Norway. Drawing on practice-theoretical approaches and the concepts of habitus, bounded creativity and consumption work, we examine the material, social and bodily factors that shape sustainability performances. Our findings demonstrate significant variations across the three socio-economic groups: how sustainability is understood and motivated; the amount of consumption work considered manageable; and differences in ecological habitus that create class-specific boundaries around what was considered appropriate and doable in terms of sustainability performances. The research further underscores the necessity of incorporating a class-sensitive lens into sustainability discussions and policies, which is vital for a sustainability transformation that does not perpetuate existing social hierarchies.
Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life
Scientists’ warning on affluence
Consumer scapegoatism and limits to green consumerism
Consumption, Sustainability and Everyday Life
Theories of practice and sustainable consumption
The Site of the Social
Living in Denial
Swamped in dinosaurs with LED lights
Mundane normativity and the everyday handling of contested food consumption
Can sufficiency become the new normal? Exploring consumption patterns of low-income groups in Norway
Is it sustainable consumption or performative environmentalism
Performing meat reduction across scripted social sites
Environmental ethics in action
Global carbon inequality over 1990–2019
Circular additions to linear systems? Exploring Norwegian households' engagement with circularity in everyday life
Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change
The unsung heroes of Norway's sustainability transitions? Making visible the “invisible” energy citizenship of low-income households
Energy-efficiency policies reinforce energy injustices
Conceptualizing non-voluntary anti-consumption
It’s what I’ve always done’
(Un)sustainable consumption
Middle-class responses to climate change
Deep experiments for deep transitions – low-income households as sites of participation and socio-technical change in new energy systems
Consumption and Theories of Practice
An emerging eco-habitus
A struggle on two fronts
Accidental environmentalist or ethical elite? The moral dimensions of environmental impact
Invoking Simplicity
Introduction to the Special Issue
Eco-habitus or Eco-powerlessness? Examining Environmental Concern across Social Class
Consumption work in household circular economy activities
| Highly cited | No |
|---|