Institutional closure in development governance
The repositioning of local voice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24239584 |
|---|---|
| Authors | József Golovics (0000-0002-3393-3531, Corvinus University of Budapest), Márton Katona (0000-0001-9011-5474, Corvinus University of Budapest) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-18 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning C Politics and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2399-6544 • E-ISSN: 2399-6552 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/23996544261500369 |
| OpenAlex | W7222891231 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
Large-scale industrial projects linked to the green transition can proceed through accelerated and procedurally insulated authorization while formal opportunities for participation or contestation remain available. This article develops the concept of institutional closure to denote configurations in which competence allocation, authorization design, and procedural sequencing leave locally accessible intervention weakly aligned with the arenas and stages at which consequential development choices remain open. Using a structured qualitative comparison of six battery-related projects across five Hungarian municipalities, the analysis reconstructs authorization arrangements and traces local voice across political, participatory, administrative, and legal arenas. The comparison identifies patterned but non-deterministic variation among three predominant trajectories: juridified voice, in which legal and administrative arenas gain relative importance; procedural exhaustion, in which repeated engagement loses timely leverage over core authorization; and managed engagement, in which involvement remains concentrated on implementation or mitigation. Across the cases, local voice persisted without following a uniform trajectory or retaining uniform effectiveness. The findings illuminate a recurrent tension between speed and coordination on the one hand and deliberation and contestability on the other in green transition-linked industrial development. The framework provides a basis for examining other fast-track or procedurally insulated development settings.
development governance · green transition · Hungary · institutional closure · juridification · local voices · municipal governance · Participatory democracy · French Urban and Social Studies · Local Governance and Planning · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Community, Scale, and Regional Governance
The Rights Revolution
Contrasting Visions of Multi-level Governance
Energy justice
Recovering” the political
Nationally significant? Major infrastructure projects, central-local relations and municipal statecraft and scalecraft in England
Captured green aims
Depoliticisation
Liberal and illiberal industrial policy in the EU
New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticisation
Tensions between institutional closure and deinstitutionalisation
Public participation and environmental impact assessment
Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector
A New Doctrine in the Making? Doctrinal Foundations of Sub-National Governance Reforms in Hungary (2010-2014)
Against the tide
Authorized Discretion
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Environmental (in)justice and the post-political
Accountability and Multi-level Governance
Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance
Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change
The territorial architecture of government
Are innovative, participatory and deliberative procedures in policy making democratic and effective
Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, and Italy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|