Uma moeda, duas faces
Representações sociais da liberdade de cátedra no ensino superior do Brasil
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2684992 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bruno Eduardo Slongo Garcia (0000-0002-9271-6473, Centro Universitário Campos de Andrade, corresponding author), Pedro Chapaval Pimentel (0000-0003-4321-903X, Universidade Federal do Paraná), Jane Mendes Ferreira Fernandes (0000-0001-6156-4342, Universidade Federal do Paraná) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | January - July |
| Pages | 11 |
| Publication date | 2021-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Education Policy Analysis Archives (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1068-2341 • E-ISSN: 1068-2341 |
| Publisher | Mary Lou Fulton Teacher College (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.14507/epaa.29.5344 |
| OpenAlex | W3126702082 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
This article analyzes how university professors socially represent Academic Freedom in teaching. To achieve the proposed objective, we conducted twenty interviews with professors from Applied Social Sciences courses in public and private higher education in Brazil, respectively with the fictitious names of UNIPUB and CENU. We used as an analytical basis the Theory of Social Representations and the four dimensions of Academic Freedom, namely: teaching, learning, researching, and disseminating. Our findings demonstrate points of convergence and divergence between the two institutions. Both focus freedom on the professor, but diverge regarding the presence of other individuals in the teaching and learning process and, therefore, in the representation of Academic Freedom. Furthermore, dimensions such as researching and disseminating showed marked differences, while at CENU research is an activity aimed at composing the class and dissemination is a distant activity, at UNIPUB there is a scientific and critical character. In general terms, freedom is represented and guided by guidelines that can generate conflicts at CENU, while at UNIPUB, there is free action that is sometimes used inappropriately
Humanities · Political science · Education and Public Policy · Education Pedagogy and Practices · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|