Modeling everyday talk
Differences across communication media and sex composition of friendship dyads
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2921045 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew M Ledbetter (0000-0001-8681-2242, Texas Christian University), Melissa A Broeckelman-Post (0000-0002-9635-2996, California State University Los Angeles), Adam M Krawsczyn (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 223-241 |
| Publication date | 2011-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0265-4075 • E-ISSN: 1460-3608 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0265407510377904 |
| OpenAlex | W2134743570 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 31 |
This manuscript advances a mesolevel approach to everyday talk. Given frequent use of mediated communication within interpersonal relationships, we use a technique akin to multitrait/multimethod decomposition to separate content- and medium-specific variance sources. The results find that cross-sex friends enact everyday talk behaviors less frequently than do same-sex friends when communicating face-to-face and via telephone, but these differences do not emerge when online. After controlling for these sex differences, online communication attitudes predict everyday talk across specific media. Beyond offering methodological tools, these results may suggest cross-sex dyads communicate online to buffer against intimacy and thus preserve friendship as platonic
Composition (language · Developmental psychology · Everyday life · Friendship · Interpersonal communication · Interpersonal interaction · Interpersonal relationship · Variance (accounting · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Media Influence and Health · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Mixed-gender anxiety and gender-based relationship efficacy
Young Adults’ Management of Privacy on Facebook with Multiple Generations of Family Members
We’re Creating Our Own Chosen Family”
Do online communication attitudes mitigate the association between Facebook use and relational interdependence? An extension of media multiplexity theory
Channel complementarity and multiplexity in long-distance friends’ patterns of communication technology use
As You Grow up the Divide Still Tends to Happen”
Proposing the Communicate Bond Belong Theory
The Contextual Specificity of Gender
Associations Between Gender Segregation and Gender Identity in College Students
Gender Segregation and its Correlates in Established Adulthood
Relational frames as mediators of everyday talk and relational satisfaction in stepparent-stepchild relationships
Modeling everyday talk
America Calling
Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway
Tunes That Bind
Social networks and Internet connectivity effects
Communication Research
Relations Among Loneliness, Social Anxiety, and Problematic Internet Use
To Parcel or Not to Parcel
Measuring Online Communication Attitude
A Social Relations Model of Everyday Talk and Relational Satisfaction in Stepfamilies
Communication characteristics of relationships with differential growth rates
Cross-sex friendship
Sex and Relationship Variables as Predictors of Sexual Attraction in Cross-Sex Platonic Friendships between Young Heterosexual Adults
Social Network Sites
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
"The Benefits of Facebook "Friends
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix
Friends Forever
Making Moosic
A Comparison of Offline and Online Friendship Qualities at Different Stages of Relationship Development
Relationships as Unfinished Business
Modeling everyday talk
Family Communication Patterns and Relational Maintenance Behavior
What you don't know won't hurt me
Constituting Relationships in Talk A Taxonomy of Speech Events in Social and Personal Relationships
Some Evident Truths About Conversations in Everyday Relationships All Communications Are Not Created Equal
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |