Closeness and other affiliative outcomes generated from the Fast Friends procedure
A comparison with a small-talk task and unstructured self-disclosure and the moderating role of mode of communication
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2924315 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sprecher (0000-0003-2940-4220, Illinois State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1452-1471 |
| Publication date | 2021-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0265-4075 • E-ISSN: 1460-3608 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0265407521996055 |
| OpenAlex | W3133086583 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 47 |
A Fast Friends procedure was created years ago as a method to generate closeness between people interacting for the first time and to provide an experimental procedure to test hypotheses about factors that may lead to initial closeness. In their original study, Aron et al. (1997) validated their closeness-generating task by comparing the degree of interpersonal closeness it generated versus that by a small-talk task. Few subsequent studies, however, have tested the validity of the closeness task by comparing the affiliative outcomes resulting from it with that from other activities. To further examine its validity, this study involved zero-history dyads randomly assigned to become acquainted through either Aron et al.'s closeness-inducing task, Aron et al.'s small-talk task, or an unstructured getting-acquainted task. The dyads were then compared on the closeness they experienced as well as on several other affiliative outcomes. In support of the validity of the closeness-inducing task, the task generated more closeness and other positive outcomes, relative especially to the small-talk task. A second manipulation in the study was the mode of communication (video-chat vs. face-to-face). No significant differences in outcomes (e.g., closeness, liking) were found based on mode of communication. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the closeness task (relative to the other tasks) for generating closeness and other affiliative outcomes was not moderated by the mode of communication
Closeness · Developmental psychology · Human–computer interaction · Interpersonal communication · Mode (computer interface · Task (project management · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics · Computer Science · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Mathematics · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychology · Social Psychology
Data sharing in learning analytics
Dyads in networks
Acquaintanceships (weak ties)
Intergroup friendship
Pathways to Entrepreneurial Satisfaction
Integration Benefits of Intimate Intergroup Contact in an Online Language Buddy Program for Migrant Newcomers
Making “fast friends” online in middle childhood and early adolescence
Ratings of the physical attractiveness of an interaction partner after a g etting‐acquainted interaction
Teaching relationship science
Barriers to Interaction With New Weak Ties
Can humans feel connected to AI? Perceived responsiveness drives social connection with AI chatbots
Pain is more memorable than pleasure? Examining how social sharing of negative emotions constructs memorable dark tourism experiences
A social relations perspective on attachment orientations and judgments of relationship quality in friendships
Biased first impressions yield positive illusions that facilitate friendship initiation
Closeness and other affiliative outcomes generated from the Fast Friends procedure
Not such fast friends? The effect of intimate conversation on social connection in text-based getting acquainted interactions
The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness
Handbook of Interpersonal Communication
The role of eye-contact in the development of romantic attraction
Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations
The effect of a shared humorous experience on closeness in initial encounters
When Harry and Sally met Dick and Jane
The benefits of turn‐taking reciprocal self‐disclosure in get‐acquainted interactions
Self-disclosure and liking
From Facebook to cell calls
The effect of interactivity on initial interactions
Toward a more complete understanding of the reciprocity of liking effect
Laughing and liking
Relationship Formation on the Internet
Strangers in sync
Can Cross-Group Friendships Influence Minority Students' Well-Being at Historically White Universities
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness
Familiarity does indeed promote attraction in live interaction
With a little help from my cross-group friend
The Relationship Closeness Inventory
A meta-analytic investigation of the relation between interpersonal attraction and enacted behavior
Effects of self-disclosure role on liking, closeness, and other impressions in get-acquainted interactions
Swiping me off my feet
At First Sight
Social attraction in video-mediated communication
Closeness and other affiliative outcomes generated from the Fast Friends procedure
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |