Schools in the media
Framing national standardized testing in the Norwegian press, 2004-2018
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2937510 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marjolein K Camphuijsen (0000-0002-7824-7674, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, corresponding author), Antonina Levatino (0000-0001-7245-3592, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 601-616 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0159-6306 • E-ISSN: 1469-3739 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01596306.2021.1882390 |
| OpenAlex | W3130663805 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 39 |
In the education sector, media outlets have been increasingly active in reporting on standardized testing. The purpose of this paper is to identify the most recurrent discursive frames used by the Norwegian regional and local press when informing their readers about national standardized testing, and to explore whether differences over time and across geographical localities exist in the pervasiveness of frames. Our analysis is guided by framing theory, and builds on a corpus of 3,046 articles that focus on national testing, published by 155 Norwegian regional and local newspapers between 2004 and 2018. The analysis identifies four different discursive frames within Norwegian press coverage, namely the frame of ‘performance’, ‘transparency and empowerment’, ‘misinterpretation and misuse’, and ‘criticism’. The four frames convey highly distinct causal and normative beliefs and realities about national standardized testing. While the dominance of the frames varies over time and across Norwegian counties, the frame of ‘performance’ is increasingly pervasive, something that potentially contributes to naturalize performative-oriented reporting and competition in education. The study highlights the importance of systematic media analyses to identify circulating principle beliefs on education, and of not limiting research to national newspapers in order to grasp geographical variation in media coverage
Content analysis · Frame analysis · Geography · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Media studies · News media · Newspaper · Normative · Norwegian · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Standardized test · Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy · Global Education and Multiculturalism · Law · Psychology · Social Media and Politics
The battle for whole-child approaches
Parents’ resistance to standardized testing in a highly centralized system
A “three-legged model”
What needs to happen for school autonomy to be mobilised to create more equitable public schools and systems of education
Education authorities setting the boundaries of legitimate discourse through responses to critique of test-based accountability in Norway
Schools in the media
The Seductions of Quantification
Metaphors We Live By
Governing Knowledge
Title unavailable
Is Anyone Responsible?
Ten years of print media coverage of Naplan
Japan's emerging role as a 'global ordinary power
Systematic Metaphor Analysis as a Method of Qualitative Research
The politics of international league tables
Rethinking the pattern of external policy referencing
Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers
Journal of education policy – 1985–2020
Media accounts of school performance
Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context
Counting and comparing school performance
Are Australian Teachers Making the Grade? A Study of News Coverage of Naplan Testing
Reporting the ‘education revolution
The Content Analysis of Media Frames
Framing analysis
Framing Theory
Framing
Framing responsibility for political issues
A Sociology of Quantification
Dynamic Public Opinion
Schools in the media
Understanding media mentalities and logics
Politics by other means? STS and research in education
Re-framing teacher evaluation discourse in the media
Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |