Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Competing models of liaison acquisition

Evidence from corpus and experimental data

Bibliographic Data

ID3050805
AuthorsAngelica Buerkin-Pontrelli, Angelica Buerkin‐pontrelli (0009-0008-2562-7797, California University of Pennsylvania), Jennifer Culbertson (0000-0002-1737-6296, California University of Pennsylvania), Géraldine Légendre (University of Edinburgh), Thierry Nazzi (0000-0002-4378-3661, University of Edinburgh)
Year2017
Volume93
Issue1
Pages189-219
Publication date2017-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0097-8507 • E-ISSN: 1535-0665
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/lan.2017.0006
OpenAlexW2600508409
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited19

Given that nouns rarely appear in isolation in French, infants acquiring the language must often retrieve the underlying representation of vowel-initial lexical forms from liaison contexts that provide conflicting information about the initial phoneme. Given this ambiguity, how do learners represent these nouns in their lexicons, and how do these representations change as learners’ knowledge of liaison and the lexicon become more adult-like? To explore this question, we analyze the types of errors children make, in both naturalistic and elicited speech, and how these are affected by input frequency. In doing so, we evaluate two major proposals for how children’s early representations of liaison develop. The first model, couched in a constructionist framework, predicts relatively late mastery of liaison (age five or older) and heavy dependence on the contexts in which a particular noun appears in the input. The second model takes an approach to liaison development that integrates it more closely with general phonological development and predicts relatively early mastery (by age three). The results of a corpus study reveal that by age three children are correctly producing liaison in the nominal domain and that their production errors are consistent with a phonological model of liaison acquisition. An elicitation task demonstrates that three-year-olds succeed at learning and correctly apply their knowledge of liaison to new nouns following brief exposure, though their productions continue to be influenced by nouns’ input distributions. Taken together, our findings suggest that by age three children are well on their way to adult-like representations of liaison. A phonologically based model, incorporating the effect of distributional context on early errors, provides a better overall fit to the data we present

Ambiguity · Cognitive psychology · Lexicon · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Noun · Phonology · Representation (politics · Task (project management · Computer Science · Language Development and Disorders · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology

  • The Productive Status of Laurentian French Liaison

    Open Access•Anne-Michelle Tessier, Anne‐michelle Tessier et al.•Proceedings of the Annual…•2023

  • When language‐general and language‐specific processes are in conflict

    Open Access•Mireille Babineau, Emeryse Emond et al.•Infancy•2023

  • A multidimensional perspective on the acquisition of subject-verb dependencies by Haitian-Creole speaking children

    Open Access•Isabelle Barrière, Blandine Joseph et al.•Journal of Pidgin and Creole…•2025

  • Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet

    Boris New, C Pallier et al.•L’Année psychologique•2001

  • Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech

    Open Access•P W Jusczyk, Richard Ν Aslin et al.•Cognitive Psychology•1995

  • Mommy and Me

    Open Access•Heather Bortfeld, James L Morgan et al.•Psychological Science•2005

  • The Blackwell Companion to Phonology

    Open Access•Marc Van Oostendorp, Colin J Ewen et al.•Blackwell Companion to Phonology•2011

  • Boundary alignment enables 11-month-olds to segment vowel initial words from speech

    Open Access•Amanda Seidl, Elizabeth K Johnson•Journal of Child Language•2008

  • Prosodically-conditioned variability in children's production of French determiners

    Open Access•Katherine Demuth, Angelo Tremblay et al.•Journal of Child Language•2008

  • Liaison acquisition, word segmentation and construction in French

    Open Access•Jean-Pierre Chevrot, Céline Dugua et al.•Journal of Child Language•2009

  • Liaison acquisition

    Jean-Pierre Chevrot, Céline Dugua et al.•Language Sciences•2013

  • The CHILDES Project

    Clifton Pye, Brian Macwhinney•Language•1994

  • English-learning Infants' Segmentation of Verbs from Fluent Speech

    Open Access•Thierry Nazzi, Laura C Dilley et al.•Language and Speech•2005

  • Word Segmentation

    Open Access•Jenny Saffran, Jenny R Saffran et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•1996

  • La liaison relève-t-elle d'une tendance à éviter les hiatus ? Réflexions sur son évolution historique

    Yves Charles Morin•Langages•2005

  • Le statut lexical des consonnes de liaison

    Marie-Hélène Côté, Marie‐hélène Côté•Langages•2005

  • La liaison relève-t-elle d'une tendance à éviter les hiatus

    Yves-Charles Morin•Langages•2005

  • Syllables and segments

    Open Access•Wim Zonneveld•Lingua•1980

  • Le traitement cognitif de la liaison dans la reconnaissance de la parole enchaînée

    Elsa Spinelli, Fanny Meunier et al.•Langages•2005

  • Proto-déterminant et acquisition de la liaison obligatoire en français

    Sophie Wauquier-Graveline, Sophie Wauquier-Gravelines et al.•Langages•2005

Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae