Advancing a system-level perspective in stakeholder theory
Insights from the institutional economics of John R. Commons
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3061328 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vladislav Valentinov (0000-0002-4247-0364, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies, Germany; Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany; Kazimieras Simonavicius University, Lithuania, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 443-467 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Science Information (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0539-0184 • E-ISSN: 1461-7412 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/05390184241302724 |
| OpenAlex | W4405824946 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 59 |
Stakeholder theory is a growing body of scholarly literature at the crossroads of business ethics and strategic management. This literature encompasses two distinct levels of inquiry, the levels of the firm and of the capitalistic system as a whole. At the firm level, stakeholder theory provides insight into the roots of the firm-level competitive advantage, whereas at the system level, it explores how capitalistic business can act as a social institution serving moral goals. Until now, the firm-level and system-level perspectives in stakeholder theory have not been effectively integrated. Drawing on the classical institutional economics of John Commons, the present paper elaborates the distinction between the firm and system levels of stakeholder collaboration and examines how they are interconnected. Stakeholder collaboration is shown to be shaped by larger institutions, such as habits, customs, public purposes, and prevailing perceptions of reasonableness. Whereas the system-level perspective in stakeholder theory focuses on the evolution of these larger institutions, the firm-level perspective explores how these institutions contribute to the emergence of the firm-level competitive advantage, thereby generating evolutionary forces that adjust the larger institutions
Business · Business ethics · Commons · Competitive advantage · Economics · Industrial organization · Institution · Institutional economics · Institutional theory · Management · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Stakeholder · Stakeholder analysis · Stakeholder Theory · Theory of the firm · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Ethics in Business and Education · Law · Management and Organizational Studies
Organizations
Legal foundations of capitalism
John R. Commons
The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918–1947
Stakeholder Theory
The Evolution of Institutional Economics
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation
Tensions in Stakeholder Theory
How Applying Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Can Provide Sustainable Competitive Advantage
Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Organizations in Action
John R. Commons and the Problem of International Labor Rights
The Implicit Morality of the Market and Joseph Heath’s Market Failures Approach to Business Ethics
Essays in Social Value Theory
Three Problems of Business Addressed by Stakeholder Theory
Stakeholder Theory
What Gives Life to Large System Change
Morality, Competition, and the Firm
Social Goals in the Theory of the Firm
Stakeholder Theory
John R. Commons' Concept of Twentieth-Century Economics
Actors and Systems
Government Regulation of the Employment Relationship
The Iron Cage Revisited
John R. Commons and the Wisconsin School on Industrial Relations Strategy and Policy
What is neoliberalism really? A global analysis of its real-world consequences for development, inequality, and democracy
Advancing a system-level perspective in stakeholder theory
Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |