Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Policy Motivation and Party Differences in a Dynamic Spatial Model of Party Competition

Bibliographic Data

ID3224403
AuthorsHenry W Chappell (University of South Carolina), William R Keech (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Year1986
Volume80
Issue3
Pages881-899
Publication date1986-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1960543
OpenAlexW2112745501
LanguageEN
Citations received53
References cited27

We present a model of party competition that produces more realistic patterns of results than those often emphasized in the literature. Reversing Downs (1957), we assume that parties win elections in order to formulate policies, rather than formulate policies in order to win elections. Voters are modeled first as having perfect information about candidate positions, and then under conditions of uncertainty. In simulation experiments we show that policy motivation and voter uncertainty can bring about persistent and predictable party differences in sequential majority rule elections. As the degree of voter certainty decreases, parties diverge towards their optima, whereas increases in voter certainty draw parties towards cycles in which party positions vary, but predictable issue stances are maintained on the average

Certainty · Competition (biology · Economics · Microeconomics · Order (exchange · Political science · Reversing · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Mathematics · Politics, Economics, and Education Policy

  • Una teoría sobre el comportamiento de los partidos políticos competitivos

    Open Access•Kaare W Strøm, Kaare Strom•Andamios•2013

  • Partisan theory after fifteen years

    Open Access•Douglas A Hibbs•European Journal of Political…•1992

  • Campaign contributions by political parties ideologyvs. winning

    Open Access•Al Wilhite, John Theilmann et al.•Atlantic Economic Journal•1989

  • Macroeconomics, Economic Stratification, and Partisanship

    Stephen E Hayne, Stephen E Haynes et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1994

  • Political Cycles

    Open Access•Pascal Gautier, Raphael Soubeyran•SSRN Electronic Journal•2005

  • Valence Advantages and Public Goods Consumption

    Open Access•Raphael Soubeyran•SSRN Electronic Journal•2006

  • The information content of elections and varieties of the partisan political business cycle

    Open Access•Cameron Shelton, Cameron A Shelton•Public Choice•2012

  • Ethnic votes and parties' mobilization

    Open Access•Luna L Zhao•Politics & Policy•2024

  • Struggle over Dimensionality

    Open Access•Jan Rovny, Erica E Edwards•East European Politics and…•2012

  • Conditional Partisanship and Institutional Responsibility in Presidential Decision Making

    Open Access•Constantine J Spiliotes•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2000

  • Building inter-ethnic bridges or promoting ethno-territorial demarcation lines? Hungarian minority parties in competition

    Open Access•Daniel Bochsler, Edina Szöcsik•Nationalities Papers•2013

  • US presidential elections and real GDP growth, 1961–2004

    Open Access•Kevin Grier•Public Choice•2008

  • Campaign advertising and political ambiguity

    Open Access•Henry W Chappell•Public Choice•1994

  • Sloppy targeting of Chinese voters in the 2020 New Zealand general election

    Open Access•Luna L Zhao•Political Science•2023

  • Selection bias in human rights tribunals

    Open Access•Thomas Flanagan, Rainer Knopff et al.•Canadian Public Administration•1988

  • Critical Realignments and the Public Opinion Poll

    John G Geer•The Journal of Politics•1991

  • Cultural Conflict in American Politics

    Geoffrey C Layman, E G Carmines•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • The Motives

    Edmond Costantini, Linda O Valenty•Political Psychology•1996

  • Politics at the Water's Edge

    Open Access•Joanne Gowa•International Organization•1998

  • Voter Turnout and Candidate Strategies in American Elections

    James Adams, Samuel Merrill•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Party Competition and the Prisoner's Dilemma

    John G Geer, Mark E Shere•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Politics, Economics, and Politics Again

    William R Keech•The Journal of Politics•1991

  • State Party Context and Norms among Delegates to the 2000 National Party Conventions

    Open Access•Thomas M Carsey, John C Green et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2006

  • When Voters and Parties Agree

    Open Access•Jane Green•Political Studies•2007

  • Strategic Ambiguity of Party Positions in Multi-Party Competition

    Open Access•Thomas Bräuninger, Nathalie Giger•Political Science Research and…•2018

  • Campaign Activism and the Spatial Model

    Open Access•Ryan L Claassen•Political Behavior•2007

  • A Dynamic Model of Political Change Among Party Activists

    Open Access•Thomas M Carsey, Geoffrey C Layman•Political Behavior•1999

  • The asymmetrical structure of left/right disagreement

    Open Access•Christopher Cochrane•Party Politics•2013

  • Wedge-issue dynamics and party position shifts

    Open Access•Jungkun Seo•Party Politics•2011

  • Policy-Motivated Parties in Dynamic Political Competition

    Open Access•Oleg Smirnov, J H Fowler•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2007

  • Direction and Uncertainty in a Model of Issue Voting

    Open Access•Stuart Elaine Macdonald, George Rabinowitz•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1993

  • Are Leftist Governments More Generous Toward Public Sector Employees? Evidence From Canada, 1967–1984

    Open Access•André Blais, Donald Blake et al.•Governance•1993

  • Who emphasizes and who blurs? Party strategies in multidimensional competition

    Open Access•Jan Rovny•European Union Politics•2012

  • Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition

    Open Access•Jan Rovny•European Political Science Review•2013

  • Left/Right Ideology and Canadian Politics

    Open Access•Christopher Cochrane•Canadian Journal of Political…•2010

  • Downs and Two-Party Convergence

    B Grofman•Annual Review of Political Science•2004

  • Party Polarization in American Politics

    Geoffrey C Layman, Thomas M Carsey et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2006

  • Political Parties and Democracy

    C Stoke, S C Stokes•Annual Review of Political Science•1999

  • Economic Growth Strategies

    Dennis P Quinn, Robert Y Shapiro•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • Valence and Campaigns

    Open Access•Jennifer Carter, John W Patty•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies

    André Blais, Donald Blake et al.•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • When Parties Move to the Middle

    Open Access•Johannes Lindvall, David Rueda et al.•British Journal of Political…•2023

  • A Test of Core Vote Theories

    Open Access•Jane Green•British Journal of Political…•2011

  • Religion and Secularism among American Party Activists

    Open Access•Geoffrey C Layman, Christopher L Weaver•Politics and Religion•2016

  • Ideology for the Future

    Open Access•Francesco Izzo•American Political Science Review•2023

  • Os objetivos dos partidos sob regimes autoritários eleitorais ou democracias frágeis. Jogo em duas frentes

    Open Access•Scott Mainwaring•Civitas - Revista de Ciências…•2007

  • Do paradoxo à competição

    Open Access•Nara Salles•Revista Brasileira de Ciência…•2020

  • Solving the paradox of nonconvergence

    Open Access•Stuart Elaine Macdonald, George Rabinowitz•Electoral Studies•1998

  • Ideological Change in the British Conservative Party

    Open Access•Ivor Crewe, Donald D Searing•American Political Science Review•1988

  • When Do Elections Encourage Ideological Rigidity

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, Kenneth W Shotts•American Political Science Review•2007

  • The Political Manipulation of Macroeconomic Policy

    Open Access•John T Williams•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Fiscal Constraints and Electoral Manipulation in American Social Welfare

    Open Access•Walter R Mebane•American Political Science Review•1994

  • A Directional Theory of Issue Voting

    Open Access•George Rabinowitz, Stuart Elaine Macdonald•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Mathematical methods of statistics

    Harald Cramér•Mathematical methods of statistics•1963

  • Choices and echoes in Presidential elections

    Benjamin I Page•Choices and echoes in Presidential…•1978

  • Candidates with policy preferences

    Open Access•Donald Wittman•Journal of Economic Theory•1977

  • The General Irrelevance of the General Impossibility Theorem

    Gordon Tullock•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1967

  • A dynamical model of political equilibrium

    Open Access•Gerald H Kramer•Journal of Economic Theory•1977

  • Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey•Journal of Economic Theory•1976

  • Advances in the spatial theory of voting

    James M Enelow, Melvin J Hinich•Advances in the Spatial Theory of…•1990

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • Political Control of the Economy

    Edward R Tufte•Political Control of the Economy•1978

  • Internal processes governing party positions in elections

    Open Access•James S Coleman•Public Choice•1971

  • A spatial model with party activists

    Open Access•John H Aldrich•Public Choice•1983

  • Voting competitions with interested politicians

    Open Access•Ingemar Hansson, Charles Stuart•Public Choice•1984

  • Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections

    Open Access•Milton C Cummings•Political Science Quarterly•1979

  • Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model

    Randall L Calvert•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • On the Nature of Political Issues

    George Rabinowitz•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism

    Open Access•John H Aldrich•American Political Science Review•1983

  • The Primary Goals of Political Parties

    Open Access•Joseph A Schlesinger•American Political Science Review•1975

  • Parties as Utility Maximizers

    Open Access•Donald Wittman, Donald A Wittman•American Political Science Review•1973

  • Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy

    Open Access•Douglas A Hibbs•American Political Science Review•1977

  • Symmetric Spatial Games Without Majority Rule Equilibria

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey, Peter C Ordeshook•American Political Science Review•1976

  • Pluralism and Social Choice

    Open Access•Nicholas R Miller•American Political Science Review•1983

  • A Theory of the Calculus of Voting

    Open Access•William H Riker, Peter C Ordeshook•American Political Science Review•1968

  • Candidate Motivation

    Open Access•Donald Wittman•American Political Science Review•1983

  • The Competitive Solution for N-Person Games Without Transferable Utility, With an Application to Committee Games

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey, Peter C Ordeshook et al.•American Political Science Review•1978

Unique citing works53
Citations per year1,39
Citation span1988 - 2024 (37)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 52

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae