Democratic Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives
Strategic Aspects of a Social Choice Process
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3301199 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David W Rohde (0000-0002-0661-6266, Michigan State University), Kenneth A Shepsle (Washington University in St. Louis) |
| Year | 1973 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 889-905 |
| Publication date | 1973-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1958631 |
| OpenAlex | W2315679976 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 100 |
| References cited | 7 |
This paper examines the committee assignment process for Democratic members of the House of Representatives. Unlike previous studies of committee assignments, this paper employs data on the requests for assignments submitted by members to the Committee on Committees. The theoretical perspective employed is one in which all the participants in the process are rational actors who have goals they want to achieve and who choose among alternative courses of action on the basis of which alternative is most likely to lead to the achievement of those goals. We argue that the allocation of committee assignments affects the goals of all the participants in the process, and thus we consider the choices of actors in the process in terms of their goals; specifically the goals of re-election, influence within the House, and good public policy.After first considering the process from the point of view of the member making requests, we show that the member's requests are related to the type of district he represents, and that the number of requests he makes is related to such considerations as whether he is a freshman, whether he faces competition from a member from his state, and whether there is a vacancy from his state on his most preferred committee.The process is also considered from the point of view of the members making the assignments. Decisions on assignments are found to be affected by seniority (where success in getting requested committees is inversely related to seniority), margin of election (where members from marginal districts are more successful), and region (where southerners are less successful than members from other regions
Competition (biology · Democracy · House of Representatives · Point (geometry · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Public relations · Seniority · State (computer science · Voting · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration
The Allocation of Federal Money to House Committee Members
The Political Consequences of Germany's Mixed‐Member System
The Consequences of Russia's Mixed‐Member Electoral System
An Initial Assessment of the Consequences of MMP in New Zealand
The Consequences of Mexico's Mixed‐Member Electoral System, 1988–1997
Introduction
Choosing MMP in New Zealand
The Israeli Mixed Electoral System
Germany
Reforming the Italian Electoral Law, 1993
The United Kingdom Comes of Age
The Causes of Electoral Reform in Japan
Reforming Electoral Systems in Mexico
The Consequences of Electoral Reform in Japan
Electoral Rules and Electoral Reform in Canada
The Mixed‐Member Proportional System and Its Consequences in Bolivia
The Politics of Reform in Israel
Mixed Electoral Rules, Partisan Realignment, and Party System Change in Italy
Mixed‐Member Electoral Systems
The Sources of Electoral Reform in Venezuela
Compromise Amidst Political Conflict
The Legislative Consequences of MMP Electoral Rules in Venezuela
Conclusion
Evaluating Hungary's Mixed‐Member Electoral System
Hedging Against Uncertainty
“Extreme” Electoral Systems and the Appeal of the Mixed‐Member Alternative
Electoral Reform in Bolivia
Partisan Bonds
Opting Out of Congress
Setting the Agenda
Is It Whom You Know or What You Know? An Empirical Assessment of the Lobbying Process
The governance and performance of universities
Mixed-Member Electoral Systems
Constitutional change, legislative performance and institutional consolidation
Committee Advancement of Women and Blacks in Congress
U.S. Senate Committee Assignments
Do Better Committee Assignments Meaningfully Benefit Legislators? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in the Arkansas State Legislature
Why do minority parties care more? Party loyalty and committee assignments in the Korean National Assembly
Legislative Oversight of Intelligence Agencies in Democratic Countries
Mr. Cobb Knows Nothing About Architecture”
Committee Assignment Politics in the U.S. Senate
Motivations for U. S. Congressional Committee Preferences
A Place at the Table
Congressional committee assignments
Going once, going twice, sold! The committee assignment process as an all-pay auction
Uncontestable favoritism
Congressional committees and the political economy of federal outlays
The War Hawks and the Question of Congressional Leadership in 1812
Press Coverage and Political Accountability
Trading Places
The Legislative Matching Game
Identifying Voting Strategies from Roll Call Votes
Patterns of Influence among Committees, Agencies, and Interest Groups
The Electoral Antecedents of State Legislative Committee Assignments
House Committee Assignments of Women and Minority Newcomers, 1965-1994
Comparing Committee and Floor Preferences
Oversight of Foreign Policy
Congressional Party Leadership
Federal Spending and the Selection of Committee Assignments in the U.S. House of Representatives
Public Administration, Public Choice and the Pathos of Reform
Conflict among Regulators and the Hypothesis of Congressional Dominance
Seniority and Committee Transfers
Allocating Costly Influence in Legislatures
The Policy Impact of the Committee Assignment Process in the House
A matching theory perspective on legislative organization
The Effects of Measurement and Methods Decisions on Committee Preference Outlier Results
The Speaker's Discretion
Self-Selection Reconsidered
The Institutional Mobility of Minority Members of Congress
Congressional Parties, Fundraising, and Committee Ambition
Party Loyalty and Legislative Success
Policy-Making, Local Factions and Candidate Coordination in Single Non-Transferable Voting
Committee Assignments
Self‐selection or Socialization? A Dynamic Analysis of Committee Member Preferences
House Party Switchers and Committee Assignments
The Color of Their Skin or the Content of Their Behavior? Race and Perceptions of African American Legislators
Influences on Deficit Spending in Industrialized Democracies
Gender and legislative committees in Africa
L'AttivitÀ Legislativa Del Parlamento Italiano
Incentives in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems
An Informational Rationale for Political Parties
Demand-Side Theory and Congressional Committee Composition
Allocation of Desirable Committee Assignments
The Politics of Speaker Cannon's Committee Assignments
Congressional Reform and Party Discipline
Staffing theFrontLines of theCulture War
Research on Congress
The Impact of Congressional Reform
When Loyalty Is Tested
The Role of Economic Reliance in Defense Procurement Contracting
How Committees Shape Legislative Behavior
Precongressional Careers and Committees
Amending Ethics Committee Sanction Recommendations in the House of Representatives
Not so random after all? – revisiting committee assignments in Dáil Éireann
Subgovernments and the Impact of Policy Fragmentation and Accommodation
The Committee Assignment Process and the Conditional Nature of Committee Bias
Congressional Voting over Legislative Careers
American Legislative Decision Making and the Size Principle
Entering the Committee System
Constituency Preferences and Committee Selection in the Mexican Cámara de Diputados
New perspectives on the House of Representatives.
Party Loyalty Among Congressmen
A Research Note on the Committee Reassignments of Southern Democratic Congressmen
Freshman Committee Assignments and Re-election in the United States House of Representatives
Changing Membership Patterns in House Committees
| Unique citing works | 100 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,96 |
| Citation span | 1975 - 2025 (51) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 99 |