Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Polarizing Effect of Partisan Echo Chambers

Bibliographic Data

ID3371129
AuthorsSara B Hobolt (0000-0002-9742-9502, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author), Katharina Lawall (0000-0002-6045-0105, University of London, corresponding author), James Tilley (0000-0002-1878-7628, University of Oxford, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume118
Issue3
Pages1464-1479
Publication date2024-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0003055423001211
OpenAlexW4389239522
LanguageEN
Citations received42
References cited62

We are witnessing increasing partisan polarization across the world. It is often argued that partisan "echo chambers" are one of the drivers of both policy and affective polarization. In this article, we develop and test the argument that the political homogeneity of people's social environment shapes polarization. Using an innovative, large-scale pre-registered "lab-in-the-field" experiment in the United Kingdom, we examine how polarization is influenced by partisan group homogeneity. We recruit nationally representative partisans and assign them to discuss a salient policy issue, either with like-minded partisans (an echo chamber) or in a mixed-partisan group. This allows us to examine how group composition affects polarization. In line with our expectations, we find that partisan echo chambers increase both policy and affective polarization compared to mixed discussion groups. This has important implications for our understanding of the drivers of polarization and for how out-group animosity might be ameliorated in the mass public

Polarization (electrochemistry · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Salient · Sociology · Chemistry · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Many shades of climate skepticism

    Open Access•Anna-Sophie Heinze, Anne Küppers•European Journal of Political…•2026

  • Information Diets Are More Diverse in Attention Than in Engagement

    Open Access•Christopher Barrie, A Selin Atalay et al.•Sociological Science•2026

  • Education for democracy

    Open Access•Adrian Arellano, J G Janmaat et al.•Educational Research Review•2026

  • On policy responsiveness

    Open Access•Christopher Wlezien•Journal of Public Policy•2026

  • Community dynamics and echo chambers

    Open Access•Chun-Yin Man, David A Palmer et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • European Electoral Disinformation

    Open Access•Noemí Morejón Llamas, Juan Pablo Micaletto Belda et al.•Social Sciences•2026

  • Putting the affect into affective polarisation

    Open Access•Bert N Bakker, Yphtach Lelkes•Cognition & Emotion•2024

  • Diversifying channels or diversifying information? Panel data analysis of polarization in the contentious pension reform

    Open Access•Yu-Heng Jung, Austin Horng-En Wang•Information Communication & Society•2025

  • How does affective polarization feel? A comparative description

    Open Access•Katharina Lawall, Peter Luca Versteegen et al.•European Journal of Political…•2026

  • Partisan (In)Tolerance and Affective Polarization

    Open Access•James Tilley, Teresa Bejan et al.•British Journal of Political…•2024

  • Echo chamber dynamics on social media

    Open Access•Carlos Díaz Ruiz•New Media & Society•2026

  • The Social Roots of Moralization

    Open Access•Chantal D’Amore, Namkje Koudenburg et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2026

  • Why do partners often prefer the same political parties? Evidence from couples in Germany

    Open Access•A Hudde, Daniela Grunow•Social Forces•2025

  • Does YouTube shape conspiracy mentality? A three-way interaction effect of partisan YouTube channel use, like-Minded discussion, and interest in politics

    Xiyue Li, Yunseung Lee et al.•Information Communication & Society•2026

  • Political Influencers and Their Social Media Audiences during the 2021 Arizona Audit

    Open Access•Kyle Rose, Deana A Rohlinger•Socius Sociological Research for…•2024

  • The More, the Merrier

    Open Access•Paulina Górska, Dominika Bulska et al.•Social Inclusion•2025

  • Partisan Homogeneity Does Not Increase Collaborative Corruption

    Open Access•Michael Jankowski, Florian Erlbruch et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2025

  • Ad-dressing the bench

    Open Access•Christine C Bird, Rachael Houston et al.•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2025

  • Media, Imperialism, and Ideology

    Soner Tauscher, Yigit Cem Eskicioglu•Middle East Critique•2025

  • Does Interaction With Out-Party Elites in a Classroom Setting Diminish Negative Partisanship

    Open Access•Samuel Frederick, Marilyn G Miller et al.•American Politics Research•2024

  • The Impact of Survey Mode on the Measurement of Polarization in the Public

    Open Access•Judd R Thornton•American Politics Research•2025

  • The Antecedents and Manifestations of Political Polarization in Visual Media

    Subhayan Mukerjee, Cuihua Shen•Political Communication•2024

  • Lessons from Europe About Just Agrifood Governance

    Michael Carolan•Society & Natural Resources•2025

  • The effect of politically homogenous neighbourhoods on affective polarization

    Open Access•James Tilley, Sara B Hobolt•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • One more constrained than the other

    Open Access•Tadeáš Celý•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • A narrative policy framework analysis of Arizona’s Empowerment Scholarship Accounts

    Jin Lee•Journal of Education Policy•2026

  • Exploring the linkage of higher education and attitudes towards European integration

    Open Access•Adrian Mcneil, Elizabeth Simon•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Authoritarians Do It Better? Belief in Misinformation in Turkey

    Open Access•Simge Andı, Ali Çarkoğlu et al.•The International Journal of…•2026

  • What explains election-driven family conflicts

    Open Access•Malu A C Gatto, João Gabriel Ribeiro Pessanha Leal et al.•Research & Politics•2025

  • Digital Drivers of Autocratisation

    Open Access•Anita Breuer•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2025

  • Support for Research on Violent Extremism Can Save Lives

    Open Access•Michael A Zárate, A F Lemieux•Social and Personality Psychology…•2025

  • Populist and Anti-Populist Discourses in Nigerian and Turkish Presidential Elections

    Open Access•Emre Işeri, Ahmad Muhammad Auwal et al.•Alternatives Global Local Political•2024

  • Heroes and villains

    Open Access•Stuart J Turnbull-Dugarte, Markus Wagner•Political Science Research and…•2025

  • Not My Problem

    Open Access•Philip Moniz•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Depolarizing within the Comfort of Your Party

    Robert A Blair, Julie Gottlieb et al.•Political Communication•2025

  • Hatred Takes An Ideologue

    Open Access•Tadeáš Celý•Political Behavior•2025

  • When Push Comes to Shove

    Open Access•Joseph Phillips, B Kal Munis et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Attitudes Surrounding Fairness and Competition in Sports Predict Choices to Partisan Gerrymander

    Open Access•Hilary Jan Izatt, Sam Fuller•Political Behavior•2025

  • Establishing the construct and predictive validity of brief measures of affective polarization

    Open Access•Jakob Kasper, G Schumacher et al.•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Is There a Backlash Against Identity Politics? Experimental and Focus Group Evidence on the Conflict Over Gender-Neutral Language in Germany

    Open Access•Paul Marx•Comparative Political Studies•2025

  • Educational Networks, Social Closure, and Cleavage Stabilization

    Open Access•David Attewell, Delia Zollinger•British Journal of Political…•2025

  • Ignorance Is Bliss

    Open Access•Paolo Abondio•Humans•2024

  • Republic

    Cass R Sunstein•#Republic•2017

  • American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective

    Open Access•Noam Gidron, James Adams et al.•American Affective Polarization…•2020

  • Why Washington Won't Work

    Marc J Hetherington, Thomas J Rudolph et al.•Why Washington Won't Work•2015

  • Frenemies

    Jaime E Settle•Frenemies•2018

  • Uncivil Agreement

    L Mason•Uncivil agreement•2018

  • Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jaime E Settle et al.•Nature•2023

  • Ideological Segregation Online and Offline

    Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M Shapiro•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2011

  • The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization

    Open Access•Erik Santoro, David E Broockman•Science Advances•2022

  • Informal social communication.

    Leon Festinger•Psychological Review•1950

  • Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization

    Open Access•Pablo Barberá Aresté, Pablo Barberá•Social Media and Democracy•2020

  • Tweeting From Left to Right

    Open Access•Pablo Barberá Aresté, Pablo Barberá et al.•Psychological Science•2015

  • Echo Chambers on Social Media

    Open Access•Ludovic Terren Ludovic Terren, Rosa Borge-Bravo Rosa Borge-Bravo•Review of Communication Research•2021

  • An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict

    Henri Tajfel, John Turner•Organizational identity•2000

  • Going to Extremes

    Cass R Sunstein•Going to extremes•2009

  • Hearing the Other Side

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Hearing the Other Side•2006

  • How group discussions create strong attitudes and strong partisans

    Open Access•Matthew Levendusky, James N Druckman et al.•Research & Politics•2016

  • The Polarizing Effects of Online Partisan Criticism

    Open Access•Elizabeth Suhay, Emily Bello-Pardo et al.•The International Journal of…•2017

  • Fear and loathing across party lines’ (also) in Europe

    Open Access•Andres Reiljan•European Journal of Political…•2020

  • Negative and Positive Partisanship in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections

    Open Access•Alexa Bankert•Political Behavior•2020

  • Do discussions in like-minded groups necessarily lead to more extreme opinions? Deliberative democracy and group polarization

    Open Access•Kim Strandberg, Staffan Himmelroo et al.•International Political Science…•2017

  • (Mis)estimating Affective Polarization

    James N Druckman, Samara Klar et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Political Homophily in Social Relationships

    Gregory A Huber, N Malhotra•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • Affective Polarisation in Times of Political Instability and Conflict. Spain from a Comparative Perspective

    Mariano Torcal, Josep M Comellas•South European Society & Politics•2022

  • How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms

    Open Access•Jon Kingzette, James N Druckman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • What Do We Measure When We Measure Affective Polarization

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Matthew S Levendusky et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2019

  • Seeing the Other Side? Perspective-Taking and Reflective Political Judgements in Interpersonal Deliberation

    Open Access•Lala Muradova•Political Studies•2021

  • The “Prejudiced Personality” and the Origins of Partisan Strength, Affective Polarization, and Partisan Sorting

    Open Access•Matthew D Luttig•Political Psychology•2018

  • Partisan Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward the Opposition

    Matthew Levendusky•Political Communication•2013

  • When Corrections Fail

    Open Access•Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler•Political Behavior•2010

  • How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Jon C Rogowski, Joseph L Sutherland•Political Behavior•2016

  • Does Enclave Deliberation Polarize Opinions

    Open Access•Kimmo Grönlund, Kaisa Herne et al.•Political Behavior•2015

  • When Deliberation Produces Extremism

    David Schkade, Cass R Sunstein et al.•Critical Review•2010

  • Party Polarization in American Politics

    Geoffrey C Layman, Thomas M Carsey et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2006

  • Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not

    Open Access•David E Broockman, Joshua L Kalla et al.•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Partisanship in a Social Setting

    Open Access•Samara Klar•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Fear and Loathing across Party Lines

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Civic Engagements

    Open Access•Michael Mackuen, Jennifer Wolak et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • The Hostile Audience

    Open Access•Yphtach Lelkes, Gaurav Sood et al.•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Divided by the Vote

    Open Access•Sara B Hobolt, Thomas J Leeper et al.•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • When Deliberation Produces Persuasion rather than Polarization

    Open Access•Kevin M Esterling, Archon Fung et al.•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Considered Opinions

    Open Access•Robert C Luskin, James S Fishkin et al.•British Journal of Political…•2002

  • Attitudes in the Social Context

    Penny S Visser, Robert R Mirabile•Journal of Personality and Social…•2004

  • A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory

    T F Pettigrew, Linda R Tropp•Journal of Personality and Social…•2006

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Recent advances in intergroup contact theory

    Open Access•T F Pettigrew, Linda R Tropp et al.•International Journal of…•2011

  • I Disrespectfully Agree

    Open Access•L Mason•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Affective blocs

    Open Access•Arto Kekkonen, Tuomas Ylä-Anttila•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Affective polarization in multiparty systems

    Open Access•Markus Wagner•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Deviation, rejection, and communication

    Stanley Schachter•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1951

  • Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy

    Open Access•Jennifer Mccoy, Tahmina Rahman et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2018

  • Interventions to reduce partisan animosity

    Open Access•Roger Hartman, Will Blakey et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2022

  • Fragmented foes

    Open Access•Eelco Harteveld•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Elite polarization, party extremity, and affective polarization

    Open Access•Kevin K Banda, John Cluverius•Electoral Studies•2018

  • Expressive Partisanship

    Open Access•Leonie Huddy, L Mason et al.•American Political Science Review•2015

  • "Is Deliberation an Antidote to Extreme Partisan Polarization? Reflections on "America in One Room

    Open Access•James Fishkin, Alice Siu Chao et al.•American Political Science Review•2021

Unique citing works42
Citations per year21
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 41

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae