Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Polarizing Effects of Online Partisan Criticism

Evidence from Two Experiments

Bibliographic Data

ID12977508
AuthorsElizabeth Suhay (0000-0003-1976-8573, American University, corresponding author), Emily Bello-Pardo (American University), Brianna Maurer (American University)
Year2017
Volume23
Issue1
Pages95-115
Publication date2017-11-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe International Journal of Press/Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1940-1612 • E-ISSN: 1040-1620
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1940161217740697
OpenAlexW2770361132
LanguageEN
Citations received73
References cited45

Affective and social political polarization—a dislike of political opponents and a desire to avoid their company—are increasingly salient and pervasive features of politics in many Western democracies, particularly the United States. One contributor to these related phenomena may be increasing exposure to online political disagreements in which ordinary citizens criticize, and sometimes explicitly demean, opponents. This article presents two experimental studies that assessed whether U.S. partisans’ attitudes became more prejudiced in favor of the in-party after exposure to online partisan criticism. In the first study, we draw on an online convenience sample to establish that partisan criticism that derogates political opponents increases affective polarization. In the second, we replicate these findings with a quasi-representative sample and extend the pattern of findings to social polarization. We conclude that online partisan criticism likely has contributed to rising affective and social polarization in recent years between Democrats and Republicans in the United States, and perhaps between partisan and ideological group members in other developed democracies as well. We close by discussing the troubling implications of these findings in light of continuing attempts by autocratic regimes and other actors to influence democratic elections via false identities on social media

Autocracy · Criticism · Democracy · Economics · Ideology · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Salient · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Social Media and Democracy

    Open Access•Arye L Hillman, Ronen Gradwohl et al.•Social Media and Democracy•2020

  • Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation

    Open Access•Joshua Tucker, Andrew Guess et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2018

  • Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda

    Open Access•Allison M Gue, Benjamin Lyons•Social Media and Democracy•2020

  • The Partisan Brain

    Open Access•Jay Joseph Van Bavel, Andrea Pereira•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2018

  • Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization

    Open Access•Pablo Barberá Aresté, Pablo Barberá•Social Media and Democracy•2020

  • The Distorting Prism of Social Media

    Open Access•Jin Woo Kim, Allison M Gue et al.•Journal of Communication•2021

  • Network activated frames

    Open Access•Natalia Arugute, E Calvo et al.•Journal of Communication•2023

  • Beyond Anonymity

    Open Access•Kokil Jaidka, Alvin Zhou et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2021

  • Quantitative Modeling and Analysis of Argumentation Polarization in Cyber Argumentation

    Open Access•Joseph Sirrianni, Xiaoqing Liu et al.•IEEE Transactions on Computational…•2021

  • Es sobre el gobierno, no sobre la Ley

    Open Access•Rocío Martínez Almanza, Jesús C Aguerri et al.•Oñati Socio-legal Series•2024

  • Disinformation in the Brazilian pre-election context

    Open Access•Tatiana Dourado, Sherri Salgado•The Communication Review•2021

  • Online incivility

    Open Access•Seo Yoon Lee, Weizi Liu et al.•The Communication Review•2026

  • The Politicization of Health and Science

    M Jones-Jang, Chris Noland•Health Communication•2022

  • Testing the Effect of Cross-cutting Exposure to Cable TV News on Affective Polarization

    Hyungjin Gill•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2022

  • Does a Speaker’s (In)formal Role in News Media Shape Perceptions of Political Incivility

    Bethany Anne Conway, R Stryker•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2021

  • Supportive and uncivil expressions in discussions on out-groups by in-group members in anonymous computer-mediated communication

    Open Access•Y L Ng, Y Song et al.•Telematics and Informatics•2022

  • Negativity makes us polarized

    Yi Wu, Fei Shen•Asian Journal of Communication•2020

  • El círculo vicioso de la expresión violenta y la polarización ideológico-afectiva en tiempos de Covid-19. La opinión pública digital colombiana en X e Instagram

    Open Access•Óscar Moreno-Martínez•Signo y Pensamiento•2023

  • The Group Roots of Social Media Politics

    Open Access•D S Lane, Cassandra M Moxley et al.•Communication Research•2023

  • “Be Nice or Leave Me Alone”

    Open Access•Nahema Marchal•Communication Research•2022

  • Gender-based cyber violence, gender and political literacy

    Open Access•Jasna Hrncic, Nina Lončar et al.•Socioloski pregled•2025

  • The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media

    Open Access•Luca Iandoli, Simonetta Primario et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • WhatsApp, Polarization, and Non-Conventional Political Participation

    Open Access•Andrés Scherman, Nicolle Etchegaray et al.•Media and Communication•2022

  • From ‘Please sir, stay out of it’ to ‘You are an abomination’

    Deana A Rohlinger, Deana Rohlinger et al.•Information Communication & Society•2021

  • El estudio de la polarización afectiva

    Esteban Freidin, Robert Moro et al.•REVISTA SAAP•2022

  • Replication Note

    Open Access•R Stryker, Bethany Anne Conway et al.•Human Communication Research•2021

  • The political communication of polarizing leaders. Evidence from Italy

    Claudia Mariotti, Anna Stanziano•Contemporary Italian Politics•2024

  • One way or another? Discussion disagreement and attitudinal homogeneity on social networking sites as pathways to polarization in Czechia

    Open Access•Alena Macková, Martina Novotná et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2023

  • Incivility makes me angrier than uncivil disagreement

    Andrés Rosenberg•Journal of Information Technology…•2024

  • Fake news

    James A Piazza•Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict•2021

  • The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”

    Open Access•Franz Reiter, Jörg Matthes•Mass Communication & Society•2021

  • Partisan Cues, Anger, and Attitude Formation

    Freddie J Jennings, Benjamin R Warner•Mass Communication & Society•2025

  • When Pundits Weigh In

    Ozan Kuru, Josh Pasek et al.•Mass Communication & Society•2020

  • A moderated mediation analysis of the impact of Facebook network heterogeneity on affective polarization among ethnic groups in Afghanistan

    Open Access•Qurban Hussain Pamirzad, Ghulam Ahmad Susyall et al.•Journal of Information…•2025

  • From “thank god for helping this person” to “libtards really jumped the shark”

    Open Access•Deana A Rohlinger, Cynthia Williams et al.•New Media & Society•2019

  • The role of (social) media in political polarization

    Open Access•Emily Kubin, Christian Von Sikorski•Annals of the International…•2021

  • Do social media undermine social cohesion? A critical review

    Open Access•Sandra Gonzalez-Bailon, Sandra González‐Bailón et al.•Social Issues and Policy Review•2023

  • Pluralismo informativo en la era de la deliberación digital

    Open Access•Juan Carlos Suárez Villegas, Ruth Rodríguez-Martínez et al.•El Profesional de la Informacion•2020

  • Partisan affect and political tolerance in the context of shifting norms

    Open Access•Jochem Vanagt, Katrin Praprotnik et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2025

  • Unpacking the complexity of online incivility

    Open Access•Baiqi Li, Y Song et al.•Internet Research•2024

  • The Influence of Sexism and Incivility in WhatsApp Political Discussions on Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Taberez Ahmed Neyazi, Ozan Kuru et al.•The International Journal of…•2024

  • Contagion Mechanisms and Emotional Group Polarization Outcomes of Online Toxicity

    Open Access•Han Luo, Xiao Meng•Social Science Computer Review•2026

  • The Empire of Beliefs and Digital Worlds

    Gérald Bronner•The Tocqueville Review/La revue…•2024

  • News consumption and affective polarization in Taiwan

    Xia Zheng, Yanqin Lu•The Social Science Journal•2021

  • The Inseparability of Race and Partisanship in the United States

    Open Access•Sean Westwood, Erik Peterson•Political Behavior•2022

  • Partisan Consumerism

    Costas Panagopoulos, Donald P Green et al.•The Journal of Politics•2020

  • Politically Motivated Internet Addiction

    Open Access•G Tang, Eva Hung et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Exploring the vaccine conversation on TikTok in Italy

    Open Access•Lorenza Parisi, Simone Mulargia et al.•BMC Public Health•2023

  • Polarizing publics in Twitter through organic targeting tactics of political incivility

    Open Access•Fani Kountouri, Andreas Kollias•Frontiers in Political Science•2023

  • The virus of polarization

    Open Access•Fabiana Schmid, Oliver Treib et al.•Political Research Exchange•2022

  • The Polarization Paradox

    Open Access•Gil Baptista Ferreira, Lourenço Silva Ferreira•Social Sciences•2025

  • Is Civility Contagious? Examining the Impact of Modeling in Online Political Discussions

    Open Access•Soo-Hye Han, Leann M Brazeal et al.•Social Media + Society•2018

  • More than Two-Party Divides? Social Media, Ideological Extremity, and Affective Polarization in the Multi-party System

    Open Access•Heysung Lee, Hernando Rojas•Social Media + Society•2025

  • How Language Shapes Belief in Misinformation

    Open Access•Aaron Erlich, Kevin Aslett et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2025

  • Perceived Popularity and Online Political Dissent

    Open Access•Jordi Suñé Morales•The International Journal of…•2019

  • To polarize or not to polarize? Unveiling 2024 European election communication strategies

    Open Access•Claudia Mariotti, Anna Stanziano•European Journal of Communication•2025

  • Mainstream partisans’ affective response to (non) cooperation with populist radical right parties

    Open Access•Luigi Russo, Paula Schulze Brock•West European Politics•2025

  • Social media and affective polarization

    Open Access•Patrick F A Van Erkel, Peter Van Aelst•Acta Politica•2025

  • Narcissism and Affective Polarization

    Open Access•James Tilley, Sara B Hobolt et al.•Political Behavior•2024

  • Communicating a common front

    Open Access•Markus Kollberg, Ivo Bantel•West European Politics•2025

  • Twitter and Affective Polarisation

    Javier Lorenzo Rodríguez, Mariano Torcal•South European Society & Politics•2022

  • Affective Polarisation in Times of Political Instability and Conflict. Spain from a Comparative Perspective

    Mariano Torcal, Josep M Comellas•South European Society & Politics•2022

  • Violent political rhetoric on Twitter

    Open Access•Taegyoon Kim•Political Science Research and…•2023

  • Reducing Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Leonie Huddy, Omer Yair•Political Psychology•2021

  • Online political adverts

    Open Access•Tom Stafford, Haim Gordon et al.•Political Psychology•2025

  • Rousing the Partisan Combatant

    Open Access•Bryan T Gervais•Political Psychology•2019

  • Like, Post, and Distrust? How Social Media Use Affects Trust in Government

    Elad Klein, J Robison•Political Communication•2020

  • Partisan Identity, Counter-Attitudinal Information, and Selective Criticism in India

    Open Access•Rajeshwari Majumdar•Political Behavior•2024

  • Online Engagement Between Opposing Political Protest Groups via Social Media is Linked to Physical Violence of Offline Encounters

    Open Access•John D Gallacher, Marc W Heerdink et al.•Social Media + Society•2021

  • Social Media and Political Polarization

    Open Access•Jia Lu, Meiqi Sun et al.•Social Indicators Research•2025

  • Unravelling the web

    Open Access•Kira Alberts•Canadian Journal of African…•2025

  • Social Groups as the Source of Political Belief Systems

    Open Access•Elizabeth Mitchell Elder, Neil A O’brian•American Political Science Review•2022

  • The Polarizing Effect of Partisan Echo Chambers

    Open Access•Sara B Hobolt, Katharina Lawall et al.•American Political Science Review•2024

  • Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America

    Open Access•Hubert Noël, Hans Noel•Political Ideologies and…•2014

  • How Partisan Media Polarize America

    Matthew Levendusky•How Partisan Media Polarize…•2013

  • The Partisan Sort

    Matthew Levendusky•Partisan Sort•2009

  • Asymmetric Politics

    Matthew Grossmann, Matt Grossman et al.•Asymmetric politics•2016

  • Bots, #Strongerin, and #Brexit

    Open Access•Philip N Howard, Bence Kollanyi•SSRN Electronic Journal•2016

  • Does It Matter Where You Read the News Story? Interaction of Incivility and News Frames in the Political Blogosphere

    Open Access•Porismita Borah•Communication Research•2014

  • Civility 2.0

    Ian Rowe•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • Promoting online deliberation quality

    Idit Manosevitch, Edith Manosevitch et al.•Information Communication & Society•2014

  • Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments

    Open Access•Kevin Coe, Kate Kenski et al.•Journal of Communication•2014

  • Online Groups and Political Discourse

    Open Access•Magdalena Wojcieszak, Magdalena E Wojcieszak et al.•Journal of Communication•2009

  • Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization

    Open Access•Jae Kook Lee, Jihyang Choi et al.•Journal of Communication•2014

  • Political Turbulence

    Open Access•Helen Z Margetts, Helen Margetts et al.•Political Turbulence•2015

  • Insecure Majorities

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Insecure Majorities•2016

  • Networked

    Lee Rainie, B Wellman•Networked•2012

  • Political turbulence how social media shape collective action

    Taha Yasseri, Helen Z Margetts et al.•Political Turbulence•2015

  • Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology

    Open Access•Clifford, Ryan Jewell et al.•Research & Politics•2015

  • Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers

    Open Access•C P Ruiz, David Domingo et al.•The International Journal of…•2011

  • Applying “Negativity Bias” to Twitter

    Chang Sup Park•Journal of Information Technology…•2015

  • Virtuous or Vitriolic

    Arthur D Santana•Journalism Practice•2013

  • Rediscovering Social Identity

    Laura Scurlock-Evans, Laura Scurlock‐evan•Social Psychological Review•2011

  • The Effects of Citizens United on Corporate Spending in the 2012 Presidential Election

    Wendy L Hansen, Michael S Rocca et al.•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Reconsidering Moral Issues in Politics

    Timothy J Ryan•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • A Cross-Cutting Calm

    L Mason•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  • Understanding Party Identification

    Open Access•Steven Greene•Political Psychology•1999

  • Following the News? Reception of Uncivil Partisan Media and the Use of Incivility in Political Expression

    Bryan T Gervais•Political Communication•2014

  • Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship

    Open Access•Noam Lupu•Political Behavior•2015

  • Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment

    Open Access•Karen Gift, Thomas Gift•Political Behavior•2015

  • Explaining Group Influence

    Open Access•Elizabeth Suhay•Political Behavior•2015

  • Measuring Partisanship as a Social Identity in Multi-Party Systems

    Open Access•Alexa Bankert, Leonie Huddy et al.•Political Behavior•2017

  • Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Gregory A Huber et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • Party Polarization in American Politics

    Geoffrey C Layman, Thomas M Carsey et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2006

  • Fear and Loathing across Party Lines

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Forging Bonds and Burning Bridges

    Open Access•Elizabeth Suhay, Allyson Blackwell et al.•American Politics Research•2015

  • "The "Nasty Effect

    Open Access•Andrew A Anderson, Dominique Brossard et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2013

  • I Disrespectfully Agree

    Open Access•L Mason•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Political Polarization in the American Public

    Morris P Fiorina, Samuel J Abram et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2008

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Expressive Partisanship

    Open Access•Leonie Huddy, L Mason et al.•American Political Science Review•2015

  • The New Videomalaise

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz, Byron Reeves•American Political Science Review•2005

  • Effects of "In-Your-Face" Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•American Political Science Review•2007

  • Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization

    Open Access•R Kelly Garrett, Shira Dvir Gvirsman et al.•Human Communication Research•2014

Unique citing works73
Citations per year9,13
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 73

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae