Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID3375424
AuthorsRobert S Erikson (0000-0003-1693-4839, Florida State University, corresponding author)
Year1972
Volume66
Issue4
Pages1234-1245
Publication date1972-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1957176
OpenAlexW2146018788
LanguageEN
Citations received127
References cited5

This paper explores the relationship between the partisan division of the northern vote in U.S. House elections and the partisan division of northern House seats. From at least 1952 through 1964, there was a noticeable pro-Republican bias to northern districting, in the sense that the Republicans consistently won about ten per cent more of the seats than the Democrats could obtain from the same percentage of the vote. Following the 1964 election, this partisan inequity has disappeared, but the evidence suggests that this change is only temporary. The normal pattern of a Republican advantage in northern House elections is produced by a Republican gerrymander of accidental origins: the tendency of Democratic voters to cluster in heavily Democratic areas where their votes for Congress go "wasted." Neither malapportionment nor deliberate partisan gerrymandering appears to have played a major role in distorting the outcomes of House elections

Democracy · Economics · Gerrymandering · House of Representatives · Lower house · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Redistricting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law

  • Durable majority gerrymanders

    Open Access•Maxwell Palmer, Benjamin Schneer•American Journal of Political…•2026

  • Voting without ideology. Evidence from Spain (1979-2008)

    Open Access•Luis De La Calle, Álvaro Martínez et al.•Revista Española de Investigaciones…•2024

  • The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•Election Law Journal: Rules,…•2002

  • Redistricting, Candidate Entry, and the Politics of Nineteenth‐Century U.S. House Elections

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Erik J Engstrom et al.•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Unintentional Gerrymandering

    Jowei Chen, Judith Rodden•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2013

  • Ideological Extremists in the U.S. Congress

    Adam Bonica, Gary W Cox•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2018

  • Technology transformation and changing demographic patterns

    Shingirirai Savious Mutanga•International Journal of African…•2017

  • Power and the Vote

    Open Access•Brian Min•Power and the Vote•2015

  • Ein übertragbarer Amtsinhaber-Bonus bei Kommunalwahlen

    Open Access•Michael Stoiber, Björn Egner•Zeitschrift für Vergleichende…•2008

  • Measuring the ?personal vote? of members of Congress

    Open Access•Dennis Coates•Public Choice•1995

  • Win, lose, or withdraw

    Open Access•Dennis Coates, Michael C Munger•Public Choice•1995

  • A "Permanent" Republican House? Patterns of Voter Performance and the Persistence of House Control

    Open Access•L H Irwin•The Forum•2004

  • The Limits of Partisan Gerrymandering

    Open Access•Nicholas R Seabrook•The Forum•2010

  • Electoral Ergonomics

    Open Access•Michael Bruter•Societies•2019

  • Gerrymandering or geography? How Democrats won the popular vote but lost the Congress in 2012

    Open Access•Nicholas Goedert•Research & Politics•2014

  • Using tax dollars for re-election

    Open Access•J Zachary Klingensmith•Constitutional Political Economy•2018

  • Affirmative Districting and Four Decades of Redistricting

    Open Access•Theodore S Arrington•Politics & Policy•2010

  • Using Regression Discontinuity to Uncover the Personal Incumbency Advantage

    Robert S Erikson, Rocío Titiunik•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2015

  • Do Quality Candidates and Incumbents Still Matter in the Partisan World? Comparing Trends and Relationship Between Candidate Differentials and Congressional Election Outcomes, 1900–2022

    C Algara, Byengseon Bae•Journal of Political Marketing•2024

  • Freshman Republicans and the 1996 Election

    Open Access•Richard T Born•American Politics Research•2004

  • Fighting fire with fire

    Open Access•Gianni Sarra•Critical Review of International…•2022

  • New Lines, New Districts, New Representation

    Open Access•Sorelle Wyckoff Gaynor, Sam D Hayes•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Tempus Edax Rerum

    Open Access•Rodrigo Praino, Daniel Stockemer•The Social Science Journal•2012

  • Institutional sources of policy bias

    Open Access•Robi Ragan•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2013

  • Electoral equilibria with restricted strategies

    Open Access•Larry Samuelson•Public Choice•1984

  • The disadvantaged incumbents

    Open Access•Yogesh Uppal•Public Choice•2009

  • A test of the revealed-preference phenomenon in congressional elections

    Open Access•Larry Samuelson•Public Choice•1987

  • Looking beyond reelection

    Open Access•Glenn R Parker•Public Choice•1989

  • Detecting Florida's Gerrymander

    Open Access•R E Best, Jonathan S Krasno et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2020

  • Partisan Gerrymandering and the Voting Rights Act

    Open Access•Richard Forgette, John W Winkle•Social Science Quarterly•2006

  • Redistricting principles and incumbency protection in the U.S. Congress

    Open Access•Richard Forgette, Glenn Platt•Political Geography•2005

  • A regression discontinuity design analysis of the incumbency advantage and tenure in the U.S. House

    Open Access•Daniel M Butler•Electoral Studies•2008

  • Reassessing the Decline of Presidential Coattails

    Richard Born, Richard T Born•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Party Control and Perverse Effects in Majority-Minority Districting

    Joseph Simons, Daniel J Mallinson•Statistics Politics and Policy•2015

  • Do Redistricting Principles and Practices Affect U.S. State Legislative Electoral Competition

    Open Access•Richard Forgette, Andrew Garner et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2009

  • A Gendered Pipeline? The Advancement of State Legislators to Congress in Five States

    Open Access•Mack Mariani, Mack D Mariani•Politics & Gender•2008

  • What They Do Does Matter

    Open Access•David W Romero•Political Behavior•2006

  • Candidates' Policy Positions and Voting in U. S. Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1978

  • Predicting Partisan Redistricting Disputes

    Open Access•Bruce E Cain, Janet Campagna et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1987

  • Electoral Patterns and Voting Alignments in the U. S. House, 1886-1986

    Open Access•Melissa P Collie•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1989

  • Responsiveness and Legislative Elections

    Open Access•Lyn Ragsdale•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1983

  • Spatial Distribution of Partisan Support and the Seats/Votes Relationship

    Open Access•John K Wildgen, Richard L Engstrom•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1980

  • Results of Partisan Redistricting in Seven U. S. States during the 1970s

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1985

  • Using Computer Simulations to Measure the Effect of Gerrymandering on Electoral Competition in the U.S. Congress

    Open Access•David Cottrell•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Pruning Thorns from the Thicket

    Open Access•Richard L Engstrom, John K Wildgen•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1977

  • The Impersonal Vote? Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage in British Elections, 1950-92

    Open Access•Barry J Gaines, Brian J Gaines•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1998

  • One-Party Dominance in Legislatures

    Open Access•John Sprague•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1981

  • Rail Liquor

    Open Access•Robinson Woodward-Burns•Journal of Policy History•2025

  • Evaluating partisan gains from Congressional gerrymandering

    Open Access•Jowei Chen, David Cottrell•Electoral Studies•2016

  • Tempus Fugit, Incumbency Stays

    Rodrigo Praino, Daniel Stockemer•Congress & the Presidency•2012

  • Generational Replacement and the Growth of Incumbent Reelection Margins in the U.S. House

    Open Access•Richard Born, Richard T Born•American Political Science Review•1979

  • The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament

    Open Access•Bruce E Cain, John Ferejohn et al.•American Political Science Review•1984

  • The Marginals Never Vanished

    Gary C Jacobson•American Journal of Political…•1987

  • Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow

    Gary W Cox, Jonathan Ned Katz•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Partisan Redistricting and the 1982 Congressional Elections

    Alan I Abramowitz•The Journal of Politics•1983

  • Racial Crossover Voting and the Election of Black Officials

    Charles S Bullock•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • The Effect of the AFL-CIO's "Voter Education" Campaigns on the 1996 House Elections

    Gary C Jacobson•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • Trading Security for Seats

    J David Gopoian, Darrell M West•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • The Burden of Election Logistics

    Santiago Alle, Santiago Alles et al.•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Party Control and Partisan Bias in 1980s Congressional Redistricting

    Janet Campagna, B Grofman•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • Campaign Spending and Incumbency

    Robert S Erikson, Thomas R Palfrey•The Journal of Politics•1998

  • The Vanishing Marginals, 1824-1980

    Donald A Gro, Donald A Gross et al.•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • Does the Creation of Majority Black Districts Aid Republicans? An Analysis of the 1992 Congressional Elections in Eight Southern States

    Kevin A Hill•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • The Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Incumbents

    Mark E Tompkins•The Journal of Politics•1984

  • It’s Nothing Personal

    Gary C Jacobson•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Gekommen, um zu bleiben – der Amtsinhaberbonus bei kantonalen Exekutivwahlen

    Open Access•Thomas Milic•Swiss Political Science Review•2014

  • Testing the Basis of Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•Erik J Engstrom, Nathan W Monroe•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2006

  • A Comparative Analysis of Redistricting Institutions in the United States, 2001-02

    Open Access•Michael P Mcdonald•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2004

  • Do Term Limits Affect Legislative Roll Call Voting? Representation, Polarization, and Participation

    Open Access•Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2007

  • Loosened Partisan Attachments and Receptivity to Incumbent Behaviors

    Open Access•David W Romero, Francine Sanders•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Competing Criteria

    Open Access•Sam D Hayes•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • A New Kind of Balancing Act

    Open Access•Kyle L Saunders, Alan I Abramowitz et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • The Partisan Component to the Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•Brad Lockerbie•Political Research Quarterly•1999

  • Incumbent and Challenger Campaign Spending Effects in Proportional Electoral Systems

    Open Access•Kenneth Benoit, Michael Marsh•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Parties and Partisanship

    Open Access•Morris P Fiorina•Political Behavior•2002

  • Competitiveness in house and senate elections with identical constituencies

    Open Access•David C Nice, David Nice•Political Behavior•1984

  • Risk Attitudes and the Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•David L Eckles, Cindy D Kam et al.•Political Behavior•2014

  • Electoral Redistricting and Endogenous Partisan Control

    Open Access•Simon Jackman, Francis Vella•Political Analysis•1991

  • Using Geographic Information Systems to Measure District Change, 2000–2002

    Open Access•Michael H Crespin•Political Analysis•2005

  • Bringing Converse Back In

    Open Access•John Zaller•Political Analysis•1989

  • The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Multiparty Systems

    Open Access•Drew A Linzer•Political Analysis•2012

  • David and Goliath in the poll booth

    Peter Bönisch, Benny Geys et al.•Local Government Studies•2019

  • Using Term Limits to Estimate Incumbency Advantages When Officeholders Retire Strategically

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2004

  • Measuring Partisan Bias in Single‐Member District Electoral Systems

    Open Access•Eric Mcghee•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2014

  • The influence of strategic retirement on the incumbency advantage in US House elections

    Open Access•Benjamin Highton•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2011

  • Il Governo Diviso Negli Stati Uniti

    Open Access•Morris P Fiorina•Italian Political Science…•1992

  • Re-election

    Open Access•Osnat Akirav•Government and Opposition•2015

  • Partisan Gerrymandering and Political Science

    Open Access•Eric Mcghee•Annual Review of Political Science•2020

  • The Geographic Distribution of Political Preferences

    Judith Rodden, Jonathan Rodden•Annual Review of Political Science•2010

  • The Campaign Value of Incumbency

    Open Access•Kenneth Benoit, Michael Marsh•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Split Party Control of Congress, 1981-86

    Bruce I Oppenheimer•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • Using Multimember District Elections to Estimate the Sources of the Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•Sedi Hirano, Shigeo Hirano et al.•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections

    Morris P Fiorina•American Journal of Political…•1981

  • Representation through Legislative Redistricting

    Gary King•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • The Incumbency Effect in Congressional Elections

    Keith Krehbiel, John Wright et al.•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • The Effect of Majority-Minority Mandates on Partisan Gerrymandering

    Kenneth W Shotts•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Ideological Signaling and Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•Zachary Peskowitz•British Journal of Political…•2019

  • Gerrymandering in Electoral Autocracies

    Open Access•Stan Hok-Wui Wong•British Journal of Political…•2019

  • The Vanishing Marginals and Electoral Responsiveness

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, D Brady et al.•British Journal of Political…•1992

  • Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage

    Open Access•Gary King•British Journal of Political…•1991

  • Critical elections and the mainsprings of American politics.

    Walter Dean Burnham•Critical elections and the…•1970

  • Elections and the political order

    Angus Campbell•Elections and the political order•1966

  • Party Legislative Representation as a Function of Election Results

    James G March•Public Opinion Quarterly•1957

  • The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections

    Robert S Erikson•Polity•1971

  • The Law of the Cubic Proportion in Election Results

    M G Kendall, Alfred Allen Stuart et al.•British Journal of Sociology•1950

Unique citing works127
Citations per year2,4
Citation span1973 - 2026 (54)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 126

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae