Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ideological Extremists in the U.S. Congress

Out of Step but Still in Office

Bibliographic Data

ID12802575
AuthorsAdam Bonica (0000-0002-3004-9441, corresponding author), Gary W Cox (0000-0002-9256-5193)
Year2018
Volume13
Issue2
Pages207-236
Publication date2018-05-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueQuarterly Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1554-0626 • E-ISSN: 1554-0634
PublisherNow Publishers (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1561/100.00016073
OpenAlexW2615606717
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited32

In the last generation, congressional moderates have become ideologically more extreme over the course of their careers. We explain this “ideological migration” of moderates as a side effect of close partisan competition for control of the US House since 1994. Competition for the House caused activists, donors and, indirectly, voters to focus on the battle for majority status. Increased attention to partisan competition reduced individual members’ ability to escape blame for their parties’ actions. Equivalently, it meant that members could deviate from their district preferences and pay a lower electoral penalty; they would be blamed in any event. Our empirical analysis shows that party-centeredness abruptly and dramatically increased after 1994, with the electoral penalty members paid for being out of step with their constituents correspondingly declining. This contributed to an important, albeit complicated, shift from local/personal to national/party representation

Battle · Blame · Competition (biology · Ideology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · History · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Constitutional Amendment Proposals as Position-Taking Activity in the U.S. House of Representatives (1979–2020)

    Open Access•Alexander H Cohen•American Politics Research•2026

  • Uniform Punishment and Conditional Reward

    Open Access•Benjamin Highton, Erik J Engstrom•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Out of Step and Still in Congress? Electoral Consequences of Incumbent and Challenger Positioning Across Time

    Brandice Canes-Wrone, Michael R Kistner•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2022

  • At What Price? Party Taxation and Member Advancement in the U.S. House

    Lawrence S Rothenberg, Kevin Wu•Congress & the Presidency•2026

  • Does the U.S. Congress Respond to Public Opinion on Trade

    Open Access•Boram Lee, Michael Pomirchy et al.•American Politics Research•2023

  • The Legislative Success of “Giant Killers” in the U.S. House

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault, Jared Hrebenar et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Crackup

    Open Access•Samuel L Popkin•PS Political Science & Politics•2020

  • Does the Ideological Proximity Between Candidates and Voters Affect Voting in U.S. House Elections

    Open Access•Chris Tausanovitch, Carole Warshaw et al.•Political Behavior•2017

  • Candidate Positions, Responsiveness, and Returns to Extremism

    Mellissa Meisels•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Ideological Moderation and Success in U.S. Elections, 2020-2022

    Michael A Bailey, Benjamin Reese et al.•The Journal of Politics•2026

  • Do Donors Punish Extremist Primary Nominees? Evidence from Congress and American State Legislatures

    Open Access•Andrew C W Myers•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Comparing Responsible Party Government in the United States and the United Kingdom

    Gary W Cox•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • Everything in moderation? The effect of extremist nominations on individual and corporate PAC fundraising

    Open Access•Mellissa Meisels•Political Science Research and…•2025

  • How Voters Punish and Donors Protect Legislators Embroiled in Scandal

    Open Access•Brian T Hamel, Marilyn G Miller et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2019

  • Macropartisanship Revisited

    Open Access•Donald P Green, Brian T Hamel et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2024

  • How Do General Election Incentives Affect the Visible and Invisible Primary

    Open Access•Mackenzie Lockhart, Seth J Hill•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2023

  • The Effects of Blaming Others for Legislative Inaction on Individual and Collective Evaluations

    Open Access•David Doherty, Laurel Harbridge-Yong•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Responsive rhetoric

    Open Access•Jaclyn Kaslovsky, Michael R Kistner•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Congressional Representation

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Shiro Kuriwaki•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • Do Elections Cause Military Spending to Go Up or Down? New International Evidence

    Open Access•Jeroen Klomp, Jakob De Haan•Armed Forces & Society•2025

  • Party Competition and Coalitional Stability

    Open Access•Peter Bucchianeri•American Political Science Review•2020

  • Competition in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen•American Political Science Review•2023

  • Party Polarization in Congress

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault•Party Polarization in Congress•2008

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • An Economic Model of Representative Democracy

    Tim Besley, Stephen Coate•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1997

  • Candidate reputations and the ‘incumbency effect’

    Open Access•M Daniel Bernhardt, Matthias Bernhardt et al.•Journal of Public Economics•1985

  • Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000

    Open Access•Jason M Roberts, Stephanie S Smith et al.•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Strategic Disagreement

    John B Gilmour, John Gilmour•Strategic Disagreement•1995

  • Beyond Ideology

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Beyond Ideology•2009

  • Unintentional Gerrymandering

    Jowei Chen, Judith Rodden•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2013

  • Changing minds? Not in Congress

    Open Access•Keith T Poole•Public Choice•2007

  • Measuring District-Level Partisanship with Implications for the Analysis of U.S. Elections

    Matthew S Levendusky, Matthew Levendusky et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Buying Negative Agenda Control in the U.S. House

    Open Access•J A Jenkins, Nathan W Monroe•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Made in Congress? Testing the Electoral Implications of Party Ideological Brand Names

    Jonathan Woon, John Collins Pope et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • It’s Nothing Personal

    Gary C Jacobson•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • Party Polarization in the US Congress

    Open Access•Sean M Theriault•Party Politics•2006

  • Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings

    Open Access•Jane Mcintosh Snyder, James M Snyder•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1992

  • Congressional Party Defection in American History

    Open Access•Timothy P Nokken, Keith T Poole•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2004

  • The Punctuated Origins of Senate Polarization

    Open Access•Adam Bonica•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2014

  • Party Polarization in American Politics

    Geoffrey C Layman, Thomas M Carsey et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2006

  • A Statistical Method for Empirical Testing of Competing Theories

    Open Access•Katsushi Imai, Kosuke Imai et al.•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • An Informational Rationale for Political Parties

    Jane Mcintosh Snyder, James M Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Mapping the Ideological Marketplace

    Open Access•Adam Bonica•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Party Government and the “Cohesive Power of Public Plunder

    Open Access•Royce Carroll, Henry A Kim•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Gregory Koger et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism

    Open Access•John H Aldrich•American Political Science Review•1983

  • The 1994 House Elections in Perspective

    Open Access•Gary C Jacobson•Political Science Quarterly•1996

  • Parties as Utility Maximizers

    Open Access•Donald Wittman, Donald A Wittman•American Political Science Review•1973

  • What Happens When Extremists Win Primaries

    Open Access•Arnold Bennett Hall, Andrew B Hall•American Political Science Review•2015

  • Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Robert S Erikson•American Political Science Review•1972

  • Out of Step, Out of Office

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, D Brady et al.•American Political Science Review•2002

  • How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Erik Peterson et al.•American Political Science Review•2013

Unique citing works22
Citations per year2,44
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae