Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Differences and Relationships Between Teachers' Pedagogical Beliefs and Teaching Strategies Used at Different School Levels in Japan

Bibliographic Data

ID3461478
AuthorsMichinari Fukuda (0000-0001-6049-0046, Simon Fraser University), Teruhiko Fukaya (0000-0002-8426-3187, Hiroshima University of Economics, corresponding author), Tatsushi Fukaya, Takashi Kusumi (0000-0001-7968-2304, Kyoto University)
Year2024
Volume14
Issue3
Publication date2024-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/21582440241281852
OpenAlexW4402935781
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited52

Existing meta-analyses have shown that active learning strategies are effective in improving students' learning performance. However, their implementation may vary across school levels. This study investigated differences among elementary, middle, and high school teachers in the use of teaching strategies, including those that promote active learning and pedagogical beliefs. We also explored differences in the relationships between beliefs about teaching and learning, teaching experience, and teaching strategies for active learning across school levels. An online survey was conducted with 550 in-service elementary, middle, and high school teachers. Participants completed a questionnaire that measured their teaching strategies, beliefs about teaching and learning, and teaching experience. The results revealed differences in the frequency of use of six teaching strategies, including those that promoted active learning. Elementary school teachers used teaching strategies that promoted active learning most frequently, followed by middle and high school teachers. There were no differences in teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning across school levels. Multigroup structural equation modeling indicated no differences in the influence of beliefs about teaching and learning on active learning teaching strategies among school levels, except that the traditional conception was negatively associated with the implementation of active learning in middle school. Constructivist beliefs were positively associated with active learning strategies across all levels, whereas teaching experience was negatively associated with teaching strategies that promoted student output at the higher school level. These findings have implications for the implementation of active learning, particularly at higher school levels

Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Teaching method · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Online and Blended Learning · Psychology · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies

  • Teaching Experience and Instructional Context

    Open Access•Xiaojiao Xue, Yuqing Zhong et al.•SAGE Open•2025

  • Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen•Statistical Power Analysis for…•2013

  • Talis 2018 Results (Volume I)

    OECD OECD•Talis 2018 Results (Volume I)•2019

  • Visible Learning: The Sequel

    John Hattie•Visible Learning: The Sequel•2023

  • Translating the Icap Theory of Cognitive Engagement Into Practice

    Open Access•Michelene T H Chi, T H Michelene et al.•Cognitive Science•2018

  • The Icap Framework

    Michelene T H Chi, T H Michelene et al.•Educational Psychologist•2014

  • Why Teachers Adopt a Controlling Motivating Style Toward Students and How They Can Become More Autonomy Supportive

    Johnmarshall Reeve•Educational Psychologist•2009

  • Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning

    Open Access•Logan Fiorella, Richard E Mayer•Educational Psychology Review•2016

  • A Primer to (Cross-Cultural) Multi-Group Invariance Testing Possibilities in R

    Open Access•Ronald Fischer, Johannes A Karl•Frontiers in Psychology•2019

  • Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics

    Open Access•Scott Freeman, Sarah L Eddy et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2014

  • A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis

    Open Access•John L Horn•Psychometrika•1965

  • Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here.

    Daniel McNeish, V V Vidwans et al.•Psychological Methods•2018

  • The link between flipped and active learning

    Open Access•Rita Li, Andreas Lund et al.•Teaching in Higher Education•2023

  • Learning by Preparing‐to‐Teach and Teaching

    Open Access•Keiichi Kobayashi•Japanese Psychological Research•2019

  • The outcomes of learner-centred pedagogy

    Open Access•Nicholas Bremner, Nozomi Sakata et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • A comparison of early childhood and elementary education students’ beliefs about primary classroom teaching practices

    Open Access•Nancy File, Dominic F Gullo•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2002

  • The impact of Lesson Study professional development on the quality of teacher learning

    Open Access•Jan D Vermunt, Maria Vrikki et al.•Teaching and Teacher Education•2019

  • Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning

    Open Access•Kwok-Wai Chan, Kwok Wai Chan et al.•Teaching and Teacher Education•2004

  • Assessing in-service teachers' instructional beliefs about student-centered education

    Open Access•Nesrin Işıkoğlu, Nesrin Isikoglu et al.•Teaching and Teacher Education•2008

  • Instructional manipulation checks

    Open Access•Daniel M Oppenheimer, Tom Meyvis et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009

  • How Teacher Education Matters

    Open Access•Linda Darling-Hammond•Journal of Teacher Education•2000

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae