Triumph of the Underdogs? Comparing Twitter Use by Political Actors During Two Norwegian Election Campaigns
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3474496 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anders Olof Larsson (0000-0003-3621-4687, University of Oslo), Hallvard Moe (0000-0001-6924-380X, University of Bergen) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 4/4/2158244014559015 |
| Publication date | 2014-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2158244014559015 |
| OpenAlex | W2135729483 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 41 |
| References cited | 47 |
Social media are often discussed in terms of online novelties. However, especially within the broader field of political communication, the uses of such services, as Twitter, at the hands of political actors such as politicians and the parties to which they belong, have become something of a fixture of research in recent years. Although the study of political Twitter use has provided a series of insightful case studies, often focused on one single election or country, this article presents a comparative study looking at Twitter use at the hands of political actors during two Norwegian elections, 2011 and 2013. We are interested in what overarching tendencies can be discerned from these uses-specifically, if differing usages can be found between the two elections, suggesting developments pertaining to the normalization and equalization hypotheses respectively. This is examined by focusing on two main analytical areas: The level and type of activity undertaken by those up for election, and the repercussions that this activity appears to have in terms of popularity on the studied platform. In short, the results suggest that although Twitter largely remains an "elite" medium in the Norwegian context, smaller political and other actors are making use of the platform at hand to higher degrees than their more well-known peers. Tendencies of both hypotheses are traced in the data, and although the findings could signal an opening for "outsiders" in this regard, the sheer amount of traffic driving the tweets sent by high-end politicians suggest otherwise
Advertising · Business · Elite · Media studies · Norwegian · Political communication · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Social Media and Politics
A fistful of followers
Do politicians connect with young people? Analysis of Twitter use by candidates in the 2019 European Parliament election campaign
Perda da hegemonia da imprensa - a disputa pela visibilidade na eleição de 2018
Análisis de la dinámica, la estructura y el contenido de los mensajes de Twitter
Interacción entre ciudadanos y políticos en Facebook en las elecciones de México 2018
El poder a través de las redes sociales
Logics of the Icelandic Hybrid Media System
L’héritage de la révolution dans les stratégies numériques des organisations politiques en Tunisie démocratiques
What matters most in the responses to political campaign posts on social media
Let’s talk about class – exploring the everyday emotions and experiences of classism in Irish education
Level Playing Field or Politics as Usual? Equalization–Normalization in Direct Democratic Online Campaigns
Inter-party competition on Facebook in a non-election period in Turkey
Clerics, weightlifters, and politicians
Twitter and Political Campaigning
Elite Interaction
Should each of us take over the role as watcher?’ Attitudes on Twitter towards the 2014 Norwegian terror alert
Leaning toward social media-based campaigning? Political communication online in Poland during the 2018 regional elections
Party Resources and Facebook Advertising Ahead of the Italian 2022 General Elections
Normalizing or equalizing? Characterizing Facebook campaigning
Engagement with candidate posts on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook during the 2019 election
Cross-platform analysis of PLCs’ (parties, leaders, candidates) social media presence in Israel’s 2015 electoral campaign
Take Action Now! A Longitudinal Study of Political Party Calls to Action Across Social Media Platforms
‘Show me the money and the party!’ – variation in Facebook and Twitter adoption by politicians
Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media
A typology of political participation online
A populist paradise? Examining populists’ Twitter adoption and use
When David and Goliath campaign online
Like, Share, Comment, and Repeat
Equalization or normalization? Voter–candidate engagement on Twitter in the 2010 U.S. midterm elections
Tweeting the July 2018 Elections in Zimbabwe
Calls to (what kind of?) action
New medium, old strategies? Comparing online and traditional campaign posters for German Bundestag elections, 2013–2017
Does the Internet Matter for Elections? Examining Perceived Internet Effects Across Five Danish Elections 2007–2022
Social media in the election during the Covid‐19 pandemic in South Korea
Political parties and social media campaigning
Engaging Populism? The Popularity of European Populist Political Parties on Facebook and Twitter, 2010–2020
Campaigning in the Age of Platforms
Malcolm Turnbull's conversational career on Twitter
Gendered patterns in music mediation
Top Users and Long Tails
The Social Media Paradox Explained
Politics as Usual
The Internet and Democratic Citizenship
Post-Broadcast Democracy
Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research
A topology of Twitter research
Content Analysis in an Era of Big Data
Towards a More Participatory Style of Election Campaigning
Gephi
The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences
Mastering the Art of Social Media
Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics
Wave-Riding and Hashtag-Jumping
Between Broadcasting Political Messages and Interacting With Voters
Political Networks on Twitter
How Long Is a Tweet? Mapping Dynamic Conversation Networks on Twitter Using Gawk and Gephi
The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter
Politicians online – Identifying current research opportunities
Faster than the speed of print
Norwegian Parties and Web 2.0
Nationalizing and Normalizing the Local? A Comparative Analysis of Online Candidate Campaigning in Australia and Britain
Rejected Bits of Program Code”
Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain
The Nordic Model
Online campaigning
Studying political microblogging
Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication
Personalization in e-campaigning
A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections
New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns
Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation
Towards more systematic Twitter analysis
Campaigning on Twitter
Who Tweets About Politics
Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting
First- and second-order campaigning
The professionalization of campaigns in recent democracies
Of course we are on Facebook’
Using APIs for Data Collection on Social Media
National Politics on Twitter
Normalising or Equalising Party Competition? Assessing the Impact of the Web on Election Campaigning
Fear of the Political Consultant
The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication
Critical Questions for Big Data
Social media and political communication
| Unique citing works | 41 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,73 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 35 |