Calls to (what kind of?) action
A framework for comparing political actors’ campaign strategies across social media platforms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6443395 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anders Olof Larsson (0000-0003-3621-4687, Høyskolen Kristiania, corresponding author), Hedvig Tønnesen (0009-0005-0395-9297, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Melanie Magin (0000-0003-2545-3594, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Eli Skogerbø (0000-0001-6803-5021, University of Oslo) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 3807-3828 |
| Publication date | 2024-02-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | New Media & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-4448 • E-ISSN: 1461-7315 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14614448241229156 |
| OpenAlex | W4392107764 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 53 |
Politicians can use social media to prompt citizens to engage by means of calls to action—statements, often in imperative form, that explicitly encourage audiences to take immediate action. This study makes a twofold contribution to this field: (1) Theoretically, we relate three factors shaping social media campaigns (audiences, affordances, genres) to calls to action related to three main campaign functions (information, mobilization, interaction). (2) Empirically, we show the applicability of this framework to systematic platform comparisons in the Western European context, taking the use of Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter by political actors in Norway as an example. Conducting a standardized manual content analysis, we find that calls for certain kinds of action are more common than others, probably related to shortage of time and resources in election campaigns. Which calls to action are used is clearly affected by the platforms on which they are published
Action (physics · Media studies · Political action · Political communication · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Media Studies and Communication · Social Media and Politics
Social Media Savvy? The Use and Effectiveness of Political Parties’ Issue Strategies Across Platforms in the German Federal Election Campaign 2025
Citizen–Elite Toxicity and Political Equality Online
Securing Democracy
Data-Campaigning on Facebook
Digital campaigns in social networks
The digital party paradox
Tapestries of Topics
Candidates Be Posting
Visualizing political communication on Spanish social media
Take Action Now! A Longitudinal Study of Political Party Calls to Action Across Social Media Platforms
Walking the line of the double bind
Campaigning across platforms
My Europe Builds Walls’
Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age
Retooling Politics
Outside the Bubble
The Digital Architectures of Social Media
From Newsworthiness to Shareworthiness
Mobilization in the Context of Campaign Functions and Citizen Participation
Mastering the Art of Social Media
Pandering, protesting, engaging. Norwegian party leaders on Facebook during the 2013 ‘Short campaign
Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics
‘Win a sweater with the PM’S face on it’ – A longitudinal study of Norwegian party Facebook engagement strategies
What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions
Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns
Homophily and polarization on political twitter during the 2017 Norwegian election
The social media logic of political interaction
Election Campaigns, News Consumption Gaps, and Social Media
Styles of Social Media Campaigning and Influence in a Hybrid Political Communication System
Beer is more efficient than social media”—Political parties and strategic communication in Austrian and Swiss national elections
Campaigns in control
The impact of use motives on politicians’ social media adoption
Online Campaigning in France, 2007–2012
Rejected Bits of Program Code”
Pseudo-discursive, mobilizing, emotional, and entertaining
Facebook affordances and citizen engagement during elections
Not so Intimate Instagram
Engagement with candidate posts on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook during the 2019 election
Backstage moments during the campaign”
Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians’ interactive practices on Twitter
Online, all the time? A quantitative assessment of the permanent campaign on Facebook
Understanding variations in user response to social media campaigns
Followers are opinion leaders
Birds of a feather flock together? Party leaders on Twitter during the 2013 Norwegian elections
Research Note
The normalization of online campaigning in the web.2.0 era
Voice and Equality
Between anger and love
Platform affordances and political participation
In Their Own Words
How Rally-Round-the-Flag Effects Shape Trust in the News Media
Does new media technology drive election campaign change
Triumph of the Underdogs? Comparing Twitter Use by Political Actors During Two Norwegian Election Campaigns
Political Messaging Over Time
Top Users and Long Tails
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |