Hegemonic masculinity, gender, and social distance
The Mediating Role of Perceived Dangerousness
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3613419 |
|---|---|
| Authors | George Van Doorn (0000-0001-7311-7099, School of Science, Psychology, and Sport, Churchill Campus, Federation University Australia, Australia, corresponding author), Evita March (0009-0004-7077-0980, School of Science, Psychology, and Sport, Berwick Campus, Federation University Australia, Australia) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 306-316 |
| Publication date | 2021-04-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Gender Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0958-9236 • E-ISSN: 1465-3869 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09589236.2020.1844000 |
| OpenAlex | W3096980198 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 44 |
Given the aggressive behaviours and negative attitudes associated with hegemonic masculinity, and the fact that men are more likely to commit violent crimes than are women, people might choose to avoid men displaying characteristics consistent with hegemonic masculinity. In a vignette-based study, we assessed whether the gender of a person displaying behaviours and attitudes consistent with hegemonic masculinity influenced people’s desire for social distance. Further, we explored whether the relationship between hegemonic masculinity and social distance was mediated by perceived dangerousness. A fictitious man displaying attitudes and behaviours consistent with hegemonic masculinity was perceived to be more dangerous than a woman displaying the same characteristics, and an increase in perceived dangerousness was associated with a desire for greater social distance. Once this was removed from the direct path, there was no link between the gender of the fictitious individual and social distance, indicating that people do not desire greater social distance from men but from anyone exhibiting ‘toxic’ attitudes and behaviours. The findings have important clinical implications, highlighting the role social connections play in changing prejudiced attitudes and recovery from depression
Commit · Hegemonic masculinity · Hegemony · Masculinity · Political science · Social distance · Vignette · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Mothers, Fathers, and Peers as Socialization Agents of Sex-Typed Play Behaviors in Young Children
Precarious Manhood and Its Links to Action and Aggression
Peers and the Maintenance of Sex-Typed Behavior
Stigma in response to mental disorders
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Toxic masculinity as a barrier to mental health treatment in prison
Illness Labels and Social Distance
How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis
Hard won and easily lost
Is there anything “toxic” about femininity? The rigid femininities that keep us locked in
Metric invariance of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory-46 among women and men
Social media behavior, toxic masculinity, and depression
Ambivalent Sexism and Power-Related Gender-role Ideology in Marriage
Teacher and peer reactions to boys' and girls' play styles
Children's Beliefs About Violating Gender Norms
Conforming to Masculine Norms
Gender and Perceptions of Danger
Recovering the feminine other
The Effects of Interaction with Gay Persons on Attitudes Toward Homosexuality
Social Support and Recovery in People with Serious Mental Illnesses
Gender and Power
Problematising 'Toxic' and 'Healthy' Masculinity for Addressing Gender Inequalities
An ambivalent alliance
Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being
Gender and Reactions to Psychological Problems
Girlfriend Abuse as a Form of Masculinity Construction among Violent, Marginal Male Youth
Reshaping Fatherhood
The Social Rejection of Former Mental Patients
What is hegemonic masculinity
Toward a new sociology of masculinity
| Citations per year | 0.6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |